Out-of-Pocket Drug Costs and Drug Utilization Patterns of Postmenopausal Medicare Beneficiaries with Osteoporosis

Leslie Jackson Conwell PhD , Dominick Esposito PhD , Susan Garavaglia PhD , Eric S. Meadows PhD , Margaret Colby MPP , Vivian Herrera MPh , Seth Goldfarb MS , Daniel Ball DrPH , Martin Marciniak PhD
{"title":"Out-of-Pocket Drug Costs and Drug Utilization Patterns of Postmenopausal Medicare Beneficiaries with Osteoporosis","authors":"Leslie Jackson Conwell PhD ,&nbsp;Dominick Esposito PhD ,&nbsp;Susan Garavaglia PhD ,&nbsp;Eric S. Meadows PhD ,&nbsp;Margaret Colby MPP ,&nbsp;Vivian Herrera MPh ,&nbsp;Seth Goldfarb MS ,&nbsp;Daniel Ball DrPH ,&nbsp;Martin Marciniak PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Medicare Part D coverage gap has been associated with lower adherence and drug<span><span> utilization and higher discontinuation. Because osteoporosis has a relatively high prevalence among Medicare-eligible </span>postmenopausal women, we examined changes in utilization of osteoporosis medications during this coverage gap.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in out-of-pocket (OOP) drug costs and utilization associated with the Medicare Part D coverage gap among postmenopausal beneficiaries with osteoporosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective analysis of 2007 pharmacy claims focuses on postmenopausal female Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in full-, partial-, or no-gap exposure standard or Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans (PDPs), retiree drug subsidy (RDS) plans, or the low-income subsidy program. We compared beneficiaries with osteoporosis who were taking teriparatide (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana) (n = 5657) with matched samples of beneficiaries who were taking nonteriparatide osteoporosis medications (NTO; n = 16,971) or who had other chronic conditions (OCC; n = 16,971). We measured average monthly prescription drug fills and OOP costs, medication discontinuation, and skipping.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>More than half the sample reached the coverage gap; OOP costs then rose for teriparatide users enrolled in partial- or full-gap exposure plans (increase of 121% and 186%; $300 and $349) but fell for those in no-gap exposure PDPs or RDS plans (decrease of 49% and 30%; $131 and $40). OOP costs for beneficiaries in partial- or full-gap exposure PDPs increased &gt;120% (increase of $144 and $176) in the NTO group and nearly doubled for the OCC group (increase of $124 and $151); these OOP costs were substantially lower than those for teriparatide users. Both teriparatide users and NTO group members discontinued or skipped medications more often than persons in the OCC group, regardless of plan or benefit design.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Medication discontinuation and OOP costs among beneficiaries with osteoporosis were highest for those enrolled in Part D plans with a coverage gap. Providers should be aware of potential cost-related nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries taking osteoporosis medications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50811,"journal":{"name":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 241-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.04.009","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154359461100081X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background

The Medicare Part D coverage gap has been associated with lower adherence and drug utilization and higher discontinuation. Because osteoporosis has a relatively high prevalence among Medicare-eligible postmenopausal women, we examined changes in utilization of osteoporosis medications during this coverage gap.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in out-of-pocket (OOP) drug costs and utilization associated with the Medicare Part D coverage gap among postmenopausal beneficiaries with osteoporosis.

Methods

This retrospective analysis of 2007 pharmacy claims focuses on postmenopausal female Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in full-, partial-, or no-gap exposure standard or Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans (PDPs), retiree drug subsidy (RDS) plans, or the low-income subsidy program. We compared beneficiaries with osteoporosis who were taking teriparatide (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana) (n = 5657) with matched samples of beneficiaries who were taking nonteriparatide osteoporosis medications (NTO; n = 16,971) or who had other chronic conditions (OCC; n = 16,971). We measured average monthly prescription drug fills and OOP costs, medication discontinuation, and skipping.

Results

More than half the sample reached the coverage gap; OOP costs then rose for teriparatide users enrolled in partial- or full-gap exposure plans (increase of 121% and 186%; $300 and $349) but fell for those in no-gap exposure PDPs or RDS plans (decrease of 49% and 30%; $131 and $40). OOP costs for beneficiaries in partial- or full-gap exposure PDPs increased >120% (increase of $144 and $176) in the NTO group and nearly doubled for the OCC group (increase of $124 and $151); these OOP costs were substantially lower than those for teriparatide users. Both teriparatide users and NTO group members discontinued or skipped medications more often than persons in the OCC group, regardless of plan or benefit design.

Conclusion

Medication discontinuation and OOP costs among beneficiaries with osteoporosis were highest for those enrolled in Part D plans with a coverage gap. Providers should be aware of potential cost-related nonadherence among Medicare beneficiaries taking osteoporosis medications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绝经后骨质疏松症医疗保险受益人的自付药物费用和药物使用模式
医疗保险D部分覆盖缺口与较低的依从性和药物利用率以及较高的停药率有关。由于骨质疏松症在符合医疗保险条件的绝经后妇女中患病率相对较高,我们研究了在这一覆盖缺口期间骨质疏松症药物使用的变化。目的:本研究的目的是调查绝经后骨质疏松患者医疗保险D部分覆盖缺口相关的自费(OOP)药物成本和使用的变化。方法回顾性分析2007年的药学索赔,重点是绝经后女性医疗保险受益人,她们分别参加了完全、部分或无间隙暴露标准或医疗保险优势处方药计划(pdp)、退休人员药物补贴计划(RDS)或低收入补贴计划。我们比较了服用特立帕肽的骨质疏松症患者(礼来公司,印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯)(n = 5657)与服用非特立帕肽骨质疏松症药物(NTO;n = 16,971)或有其他慢性疾病(OCC;N = 16,971)。我们测量了平均每月处方药填充和OOP成本,停药和跳绳。结果半数以上的样本达到了覆盖缺口;然后,参加部分间隙暴露计划或全间隙暴露计划的特立帕肽使用者的OOP成本上升(分别增加121%和186%;300美元和349美元),但没有间隔暴露的pdp或RDS计划的人下降了(分别下降了49%和30%;131美元和40美元)。部分或全部缺口暴露的pdp受益人的OOP成本在NTO组中增加了120%(增加了144美元和176美元),在OCC组中几乎翻了一番(增加了124美元和151美元);这些面向对象的费用大大低于特里帕肽用户的费用。无论计划或福利设计如何,特立帕肽使用者和NTO组成员比OCC组更经常停止或跳过药物治疗。结论骨质疏松患者的药物停药费用和OOP费用在参保缺口较大的D部分计划中最高。医疗服务提供者应该意识到在服用骨质疏松药物的医疗保险受益人中潜在的与费用相关的不依从。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author Index Subject Index Editorial Board Adverse Effects of Analgesics Commonly Used by Older Adults With Osteoarthritis: Focus on Non-Opioid and Opioid Analgesics Effect of Combination Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol or Inhaled Corticosteroids on Asthma-Related Outcomes in a Medicare-Eligible Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1