Empathy in UK medical students: differences by gender, medical year and specialty interest.

IF 1.1 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Education for Primary Care Pub Date : 2011-09-01 DOI:10.1080/14739879.2011.11494022
Sina Tavakol, Reg Dennick, Mohsen Tavakol
{"title":"Empathy in UK medical students: differences by gender, medical year and specialty interest.","authors":"Sina Tavakol,&nbsp;Reg Dennick,&nbsp;Mohsen Tavakol","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2011.11494022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The importance of empathetic communication in the context of patient care has been suggested as a crucial element in the delivery of high-quality medical care. Although some countries have measured empathy among medical students, little is known formally about the state of affairs regarding empathy in the UK with regard to gender, medical years and speciality. This paper presents the results from a cross-sectional study that explored the relationship between undergraduate medical students' empathy scores relevant to gender, medical school year and future career ambitions. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, a self-administered questionnaire, was used for collecting data. It was decided to incorporate the scale into a web application that was only accessible through a confidential hyperlink. A total of 853 (68.2%) medical students completed the survey. Female students (n=470) scored significantly (t((819))=-6.63; 95% CI=-0.30, -0.16) higher than male students (n=351). No significant differences were observed between empathy mean scores and medical school year. Students choosing people-oriented specialities had significantly higher mean scores in comparison to students preferring technology oriented specialities. Three hypotheses were tested in this study. The hypothesis that female students would score higher than male students was supported by the results. The findings did not support the hypothesis that empathy scores decline during the medical school years. Finally, the findings did support the hypothesis that those preferring peopleoriented specialities would score higher on the empathy scale than students choosing technology oriented specialities. Some recommendations are made and the limitations of study are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":"22 5","pages":"297-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14739879.2011.11494022","citationCount":"117","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2011.11494022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 117

Abstract

The importance of empathetic communication in the context of patient care has been suggested as a crucial element in the delivery of high-quality medical care. Although some countries have measured empathy among medical students, little is known formally about the state of affairs regarding empathy in the UK with regard to gender, medical years and speciality. This paper presents the results from a cross-sectional study that explored the relationship between undergraduate medical students' empathy scores relevant to gender, medical school year and future career ambitions. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, a self-administered questionnaire, was used for collecting data. It was decided to incorporate the scale into a web application that was only accessible through a confidential hyperlink. A total of 853 (68.2%) medical students completed the survey. Female students (n=470) scored significantly (t((819))=-6.63; 95% CI=-0.30, -0.16) higher than male students (n=351). No significant differences were observed between empathy mean scores and medical school year. Students choosing people-oriented specialities had significantly higher mean scores in comparison to students preferring technology oriented specialities. Three hypotheses were tested in this study. The hypothesis that female students would score higher than male students was supported by the results. The findings did not support the hypothesis that empathy scores decline during the medical school years. Finally, the findings did support the hypothesis that those preferring peopleoriented specialities would score higher on the empathy scale than students choosing technology oriented specialities. Some recommendations are made and the limitations of study are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国医学生的同理心:性别、医学年份和专业兴趣的差异
在病人护理的背景下,移情沟通的重要性被认为是提供高质量医疗服务的关键因素。虽然一些国家已经测量了医学生的同理心,但在英国,关于性别、医疗年限和专业的同理心,人们对其现状知之甚少。本研究采用横断面研究方法,探讨医学生性别、学制与未来职业抱负共情得分的关系。收集数据采用杰弗逊医生共情量表(Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy),这是一份自我管理的问卷。他们决定将天平整合到一个只能通过保密超链接访问的web应用程序中。共有853名医学生(68.2%)完成调查。女学生(n=470)得分显著(t((819))=-6.63;95% CI=-0.30, -0.16)高于男学生(n=351)。共情平均分与医学院年级间无显著差异。选择“以人为本”专业的学生平均得分显著高于选择“以技术为导向”专业的学生。本研究检验了三个假设。研究结果支持了女生得分高于男生的假设。研究结果不支持同感得分在医学院期间下降的假设。最后,研究结果确实支持了一个假设,即那些选择以人为本的专业的学生在同理心量表上的得分高于选择以技术为导向的专业的学生。提出了一些建议,并讨论了研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
期刊最新文献
Protecting the last communities of practice. Sustaining GP partnerships: is postgraduate education doing enough? A mixed-method evaluation of a general practice paediatric education programme, using Moore's outcomes framework for continuing medical education. A misstep is not the end of the dance: embracing the challenges of reflective practice. The challenges of joint undergraduate teaching at the primary-secondary care interface: learning from the educator experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1