Validation of a persian version of motorcycle rider behavior questionnaire.

Seyed Abbas Motevalian, Mohsen Asadi-Lari, Habibollah Rahimi, Mehrdad Eftekhar
{"title":"Validation of a persian version of motorcycle rider behavior questionnaire.","authors":"Seyed Abbas Motevalian,&nbsp;Mohsen Asadi-Lari,&nbsp;Habibollah Rahimi,&nbsp;Mehrdad Eftekhar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Iran, road traffic injuries are the first cause of burden of disease and motorcyclists are the most vulnerable road users. Elliot and colleagues developed the \"Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire\" (MRBQ), on the basis of Reason's \"Driver Behavior Questionnaire\" (DBQ) in 2007. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of a Persian version of MRBQ. The 43-item MRBQ was adapted to Persian according to translation-back translation method. The questionnaire was significantly revised after assessment of content validity. In the revised version, 10 items of original MRBQ were deleted and 15 new items were added. The revised MRBQ was used in a survey of 518 motorcyclists. To assess the construct validity of MRBQ, we used Buss-Perry Aggression questionnaire concurrently on all of the subjects. After three weeks, we carried out the retest study on 119 out of 518 subjects. The mean age of the subjects was 32.5 years (SD=8.8). All of the participants were male with mean of 9.3 years of motorcycle riding experience (SD=7.3). Principal Components Analysis (PCA) showed six subscales: \"Speed Violations\", \"Traffic Errors\", \"Safety Violations\", \"Traffic Violations\", \"Stunts\" and \"Control Errors\", which accounted for 36.44% of total variance together. For each of these subscales, Cronbach's Alpha was between 0.79 to 0.91. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for six subscales and total questionnaire were from 0.73 to 0.91. There were significant correlations between MRBQ subscales and subscales of Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire. The results indicated that the 48-item Persian version of MRBQ is a suitable measure for studying motorcyclists' behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":87875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference","volume":"55 ","pages":"91-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3256814/pdf/file087final.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Iran, road traffic injuries are the first cause of burden of disease and motorcyclists are the most vulnerable road users. Elliot and colleagues developed the "Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire" (MRBQ), on the basis of Reason's "Driver Behavior Questionnaire" (DBQ) in 2007. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of a Persian version of MRBQ. The 43-item MRBQ was adapted to Persian according to translation-back translation method. The questionnaire was significantly revised after assessment of content validity. In the revised version, 10 items of original MRBQ were deleted and 15 new items were added. The revised MRBQ was used in a survey of 518 motorcyclists. To assess the construct validity of MRBQ, we used Buss-Perry Aggression questionnaire concurrently on all of the subjects. After three weeks, we carried out the retest study on 119 out of 518 subjects. The mean age of the subjects was 32.5 years (SD=8.8). All of the participants were male with mean of 9.3 years of motorcycle riding experience (SD=7.3). Principal Components Analysis (PCA) showed six subscales: "Speed Violations", "Traffic Errors", "Safety Violations", "Traffic Violations", "Stunts" and "Control Errors", which accounted for 36.44% of total variance together. For each of these subscales, Cronbach's Alpha was between 0.79 to 0.91. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient for six subscales and total questionnaire were from 0.73 to 0.91. There were significant correlations between MRBQ subscales and subscales of Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire. The results indicated that the 48-item Persian version of MRBQ is a suitable measure for studying motorcyclists' behavior.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波斯语版摩托车骑手行为问卷的验证。
在伊朗,道路交通伤害是造成疾病负担的首要原因,骑摩托车的人是最脆弱的道路使用者。Elliot和他的同事在2007年Reason的“司机行为问卷”(DBQ)的基础上开发了“摩托车骑手行为问卷”(MRBQ)。本研究的目的是评估波斯语版MRBQ的效度和信度。根据翻译回译法,将43项MRBQ翻译成波斯语。经内容效度评估后,问卷被显著修订。在修改后的版本中,删除了原来MRBQ的10个项目,增加了15个项目。修订后的MRBQ被用于对518名摩托车手的调查。为了评估MRBQ的构念效度,我们在所有被试上同时使用Buss-Perry攻击问卷。三周后,我们对518名受试者中的119人进行了复测研究。受试者的平均年龄为32.5岁(SD=8.8)。所有参与者均为男性,平均9.3年的摩托车驾驶经验(SD=7.3)。主成分分析(PCA)显示“超速”、“交通错误”、“安全违规”、“交通违规”、“特技”和“控制错误”6个子尺度,共占总方差的36.44%。对于每个子量表,Cronbach's Alpha在0.79到0.91之间。六个分量表与总问卷的类内相关系数为0.73 ~ 0.91。MRBQ量表与Buss-Perry攻击量表存在显著相关。结果表明,48项波斯语版本的MRBQ是一种适合研究摩托车手行为的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual and cognitive distraction metrics in the age of the smart phone: A basic review. Dynamics of Driver Distraction: The process of engaging and disengaging. Modeling situation awareness and crash risk. An opportunity for convergence? Understanding the prevalence and risk of distracted driving through the use of crash databases, crash investigations, and other approaches. Estimates of prevalence and risk associated with inattention and distraction based upon in situ naturalistic data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1