Lateral neck injury assessments in side impact using post mortem human subject tests.

Narayan Yoganandan, John Humm, Frank A Pintar, Christopher E Wolfla, Dennis J Maiman
{"title":"Lateral neck injury assessments in side impact using post mortem human subject tests.","authors":"Narayan Yoganandan, John Humm, Frank A Pintar, Christopher E Wolfla, Dennis J Maiman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current neck injury criteria are based on matching upper cervical spine injuries from piglet tests to airbag deployment loads and pairing kinematics from child dummies. These \"child-based\" scaled data together with adult human cadaver tolerances in axial loading are used to specify neck injury thresholds in axial compression and tension, and flexion and extension moment about the occipital condyles; no thresholds are specified for any other force or moment including lateral bending. The objective of this study was to develop a testing methodology and to determine the lateral bending moment injury threshold under coronal loading. Post mortem human subjects (PMHS) were used. Specimens consisted of whole body and isolated head-neck complexes with intact musculature. Intact specimen positioning included: sitting PMHS upright on a rigid seat, supporting the torso by a plate, maintaining Frankfurt plane horizontal. Isolated head-neck complexes were fixed at T1 with the occiput connected via a custom apparatus to a testing device to induce lateral bending motion. Head angular and linear accelerations and angular velocities were computed using a pyramid nine accelerometer package on the head; specimen-specific physical properties including center of gravity and moments of inertia in the three-dimensions; and equations of equilibrium. These data were used to determine neck loads at the occipital condyles. No specimens sustained injuries, identified by palpation, x-rays, CT, and autopsy. Results from 24 tests indicated that PMHS head-neck complexes can tolerate 75 Nm of coronal moment at low axial load without failure, and this level may be used as an initial estimate of the injury reference value under lateral loading to the human head-neck complex.</p>","PeriodicalId":87875,"journal":{"name":"Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference","volume":"55 ","pages":"169-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3256829/pdf/file030final.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current neck injury criteria are based on matching upper cervical spine injuries from piglet tests to airbag deployment loads and pairing kinematics from child dummies. These "child-based" scaled data together with adult human cadaver tolerances in axial loading are used to specify neck injury thresholds in axial compression and tension, and flexion and extension moment about the occipital condyles; no thresholds are specified for any other force or moment including lateral bending. The objective of this study was to develop a testing methodology and to determine the lateral bending moment injury threshold under coronal loading. Post mortem human subjects (PMHS) were used. Specimens consisted of whole body and isolated head-neck complexes with intact musculature. Intact specimen positioning included: sitting PMHS upright on a rigid seat, supporting the torso by a plate, maintaining Frankfurt plane horizontal. Isolated head-neck complexes were fixed at T1 with the occiput connected via a custom apparatus to a testing device to induce lateral bending motion. Head angular and linear accelerations and angular velocities were computed using a pyramid nine accelerometer package on the head; specimen-specific physical properties including center of gravity and moments of inertia in the three-dimensions; and equations of equilibrium. These data were used to determine neck loads at the occipital condyles. No specimens sustained injuries, identified by palpation, x-rays, CT, and autopsy. Results from 24 tests indicated that PMHS head-neck complexes can tolerate 75 Nm of coronal moment at low axial load without failure, and this level may be used as an initial estimate of the injury reference value under lateral loading to the human head-neck complex.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用死后人体试验评估侧面撞击对颈部造成的侧向伤害。
目前的颈部损伤标准是基于将仔猪试验中的上颈椎损伤与安全气囊展开载荷和儿童假人的配对运动学相匹配。这些 "基于儿童 "的比例数据与成人尸体在轴向加载中的公差一起,被用于指定颈部损伤的轴向压缩和拉伸阈值,以及枕骨髁上的屈伸力矩;没有指定任何其他力或力矩(包括横向弯曲)的阈值。本研究的目的是开发一种测试方法,并确定冠状负荷下的侧向弯曲力矩损伤阈值。使用的是死后人体受试者(PMHS)。标本包括完整的全身和孤立的头颈复合体。完整标本的定位包括:让 PMHS 直立坐在刚性座椅上,用一块板支撑躯干,保持法兰克福平面水平。孤立的头颈复合体固定在 T1 位置,枕部通过定制装置连接到测试设备,以诱导横向弯曲运动。头部角加速度、线加速度和角速度是通过头部的金字塔九加速度计软件包计算得出的;试样的具体物理特性包括重心和三维惯性矩;以及平衡方程。这些数据用于确定枕骨髁处的颈部负荷。通过触诊、X 射线检查、CT 和尸体解剖,没有发现试样受伤。24 次测试的结果表明,PMHS 头颈复合体在低轴向载荷下可承受 75 牛米的冠状力矩而不会失效,这一水平可作为人类头颈复合体在横向载荷下受伤参考值的初步估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual and cognitive distraction metrics in the age of the smart phone: A basic review. Dynamics of Driver Distraction: The process of engaging and disengaging. Modeling situation awareness and crash risk. An opportunity for convergence? Understanding the prevalence and risk of distracted driving through the use of crash databases, crash investigations, and other approaches. Estimates of prevalence and risk associated with inattention and distraction based upon in situ naturalistic data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1