The Wellness Child Care Assessment Tool: A Measure to Assess the Quality of Written Nutrition and Physical Activity Policies

Jennifer Falbe MPH, Erica L. Kenney MPH, Kathryn E. Henderson PhD, Marlene B. Schwartz PhD
{"title":"The Wellness Child Care Assessment Tool: A Measure to Assess the Quality of Written Nutrition and Physical Activity Policies","authors":"Jennifer Falbe MPH,&nbsp;Erica L. Kenney MPH,&nbsp;Kathryn E. Henderson PhD,&nbsp;Marlene B. Schwartz PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is a growing interest in studying the influence of child-care center policies on the health of preschool-aged children.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop a reliable and valid instrument to quantitatively evaluate the quality of written nutrition and physical activity policies at child-care centers.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Reliability and validation study. A 65-item measure was created to evaluate five areas of child-care center policies: nutrition education, nutrition standards for foods and beverages, promoting healthy eating in the child-care setting, physical activity, and communication and evaluation. The total scale and each subscale were scored on comprehensiveness and strength.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Analyses were conducted on 94 independent policies from Connecticut child-care centers participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program.</p></div><div><h3>Statistical analyses performed</h3><p>Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to measure inter-rater reliability, and Cronbach's α was used to estimate internal consistency. To test construct validity, <em>t</em> tests were used to assess differences in scores between Head Start and non–Head Start centers and between National Association for the Education of Young Children–accredited and nonaccredited centers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Inter-rater reliability was high for total comprehensiveness and strength scores (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.98 and 0.94, respectively) and subscale scores (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.84 to 0.99). Subscales were adequately internally reliable (Cronbach's α=.53 to .83). Comprehensiveness and strength scores were higher for Head Start centers than non–Head Start centers across most domains and higher for National Association for the Education of Young Children–accredited centers than nonaccredited centers across some but not all domains, providing evidence of construct validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This instrument provides a standardized method to analyze and compare the comprehensiveness and strength of written nutrition and physical activity policies in child-care centers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","volume":"111 12","pages":"Pages 1852-1860"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.006","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311015483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background

There is a growing interest in studying the influence of child-care center policies on the health of preschool-aged children.

Objective

To develop a reliable and valid instrument to quantitatively evaluate the quality of written nutrition and physical activity policies at child-care centers.

Design

Reliability and validation study. A 65-item measure was created to evaluate five areas of child-care center policies: nutrition education, nutrition standards for foods and beverages, promoting healthy eating in the child-care setting, physical activity, and communication and evaluation. The total scale and each subscale were scored on comprehensiveness and strength.

Setting

Analyses were conducted on 94 independent policies from Connecticut child-care centers participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program.

Statistical analyses performed

Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to measure inter-rater reliability, and Cronbach's α was used to estimate internal consistency. To test construct validity, t tests were used to assess differences in scores between Head Start and non–Head Start centers and between National Association for the Education of Young Children–accredited and nonaccredited centers.

Results

Inter-rater reliability was high for total comprehensiveness and strength scores (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.98 and 0.94, respectively) and subscale scores (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.84 to 0.99). Subscales were adequately internally reliable (Cronbach's α=.53 to .83). Comprehensiveness and strength scores were higher for Head Start centers than non–Head Start centers across most domains and higher for National Association for the Education of Young Children–accredited centers than nonaccredited centers across some but not all domains, providing evidence of construct validity.

Conclusions

This instrument provides a standardized method to analyze and compare the comprehensiveness and strength of written nutrition and physical activity policies in child-care centers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康儿童护理评估工具:一种评估书面营养和体育活动政策质量的措施
研究托儿中心政策对学龄前儿童健康的影响越来越引起人们的兴趣。目的建立一种可靠有效的工具,定量评价托儿中心书面营养和体育活动政策的质量。设计可靠性和有效性研究。制定了一项65项措施,以评估托儿中心政策的五个领域:营养教育、食品和饮料的营养标准、在托儿环境中促进健康饮食、体育活动以及沟通和评价。总量表和各子量表以综合性和强度评分。环境分析是对康涅狄格州儿童护理中心参与儿童和成人护理食品计划的94项独立政策进行的。统计分析采用类相关系数(class correlation coefficient)衡量评级间信度,采用Cronbach’s α估计内部一致性。为了检验结构效度,使用t检验来评估抢先开始和非抢先开始中心之间以及国家幼儿教育协会认证和非认证中心之间的分数差异。结果总综合性和强度评分(类内相关系数分别为0.98和0.94)和亚量表评分(类内相关系数为0.84 ~ 0.99)的量表间信度较高。分量表具有足够的内部可靠性(Cronbach's α=。53到0.83)。在大多数领域,学前教育中心的综合性和强度得分高于非学前教育中心,在一些但不是所有领域,国家幼儿教育协会认证的中心高于非认证的中心,这提供了结构效度的证据。结论该工具为分析和比较托儿中心书面营养和体育活动政策的综合性和强度提供了一种标准化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analyzing bivariate cross-trait genetic architecture in GWAS summary statistics with the BIGA cloud computing platform. Early adversity and emotional awareness: A partial confirmation and extension of their relationship. Comparison of Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in the Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Critically ill Patients. A Case Report of Chondromyxoid Fibroma of the Nasal Cavity. Effects of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccines on Patients with Epilepsy: Real-Life Experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1