How Much of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Dietary Intakes, Exercise, and Weight Status Can Be Explained by Nutrition- and Health-Related Psychosocial Factors and Socioeconomic Status among US Adults?

Youfa Wang MD, PhD, Xiaoli Chen MD, PhD
{"title":"How Much of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Dietary Intakes, Exercise, and Weight Status Can Be Explained by Nutrition- and Health-Related Psychosocial Factors and Socioeconomic Status among US Adults?","authors":"Youfa Wang MD, PhD,&nbsp;Xiaoli Chen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large disparities exist in obesity and other chronic diseases across racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) groups in the United States. This study examined how much of racial/ethnic differences in diet, exercise, and weight status could be explained by nutrition- and health-related psychosocial factors (NHRPF) and SES among US adults. Nationally representative data of 4,356 US adults from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey were used. NHRPF were assessed using 24 questions and related index scores. Dietary intakes were assessed using two nonconsecutive 24-hour dietary recalls. The US Department of Agriculture 2005 Healthy Eating Index was applied to evaluate diet quality. Body mass index was calculated based on self-reported weight and height. SES was assessed using education and household income. Americans with higher SES had better NHRPF and Healthy Eating Index scores. There were some small racial/ethnic differences in NHRPF, including making food choices and awareness of nutrition-related health risks. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models revealed some racial/ethnic differences in diet, exercise, and body mass index, but few of these disparities was explained by NHRPF, whereas SES explained some. The odds ratio of body mass index ≥25 for non-Hispanic blacks compared with whites decreased by 38% after SES was adjusted for. For exercise, we found a smaller change (9.5%) in the racial/ethnic differences when controlling for SES. In conclusion, NHRPF may explain very few, but SES may contribute some of the racial/ethnic disparities in diet, exercise, and weight status in the United States.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","volume":"111 12","pages":"Pages 1904-1911"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.036","citationCount":"154","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822311016580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 154

Abstract

Large disparities exist in obesity and other chronic diseases across racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) groups in the United States. This study examined how much of racial/ethnic differences in diet, exercise, and weight status could be explained by nutrition- and health-related psychosocial factors (NHRPF) and SES among US adults. Nationally representative data of 4,356 US adults from the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey were used. NHRPF were assessed using 24 questions and related index scores. Dietary intakes were assessed using two nonconsecutive 24-hour dietary recalls. The US Department of Agriculture 2005 Healthy Eating Index was applied to evaluate diet quality. Body mass index was calculated based on self-reported weight and height. SES was assessed using education and household income. Americans with higher SES had better NHRPF and Healthy Eating Index scores. There were some small racial/ethnic differences in NHRPF, including making food choices and awareness of nutrition-related health risks. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models revealed some racial/ethnic differences in diet, exercise, and body mass index, but few of these disparities was explained by NHRPF, whereas SES explained some. The odds ratio of body mass index ≥25 for non-Hispanic blacks compared with whites decreased by 38% after SES was adjusted for. For exercise, we found a smaller change (9.5%) in the racial/ethnic differences when controlling for SES. In conclusion, NHRPF may explain very few, but SES may contribute some of the racial/ethnic disparities in diet, exercise, and weight status in the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国成年人中,饮食摄入量、运动和体重状况的种族/民族差异有多少可以用营养和健康相关的社会心理因素和社会经济地位来解释?
在美国,不同种族/民族和社会经济地位(SES)群体在肥胖和其他慢性疾病方面存在巨大差异。这项研究调查了美国成年人在饮食、运动和体重状况方面的种族/民族差异有多少可以用营养和健康相关的社会心理因素(NHRPF)和社会经济地位来解释。研究使用了1994-1996年个人食物摄入持续调查和饮食与健康知识调查中4,356名美国成年人的全国代表性数据。NHRPF采用24个问题和相关指标得分进行评估。通过两次非连续的24小时饮食回顾来评估饮食摄入量。采用美国农业部2005年健康饮食指数评价饮食质量。体重指数是根据自我报告的体重和身高计算出来的。SES是通过教育和家庭收入来评估的。社会地位越高的美国人NHRPF和健康饮食指数得分越高。在NHRPF方面存在一些小的种族/民族差异,包括食物选择和对与营养有关的健康风险的认识。多变量线性和逻辑回归模型揭示了种族/民族在饮食、运动和体重指数方面的一些差异,但这些差异很少可以由NHRPF解释,而SES可以解释部分差异。经SES校正后,非西班牙裔黑人与白人相比体重指数≥25的优势比下降了38%。在运动方面,在控制社会经济地位的情况下,我们发现种族/民族差异的变化较小(9.5%)。总之,NHRPF可能解释得很少,但SES可能是美国饮食、运动和体重状况方面的一些种族/民族差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analyzing bivariate cross-trait genetic architecture in GWAS summary statistics with the BIGA cloud computing platform. Early adversity and emotional awareness: A partial confirmation and extension of their relationship. Comparison of Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in the Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Critically ill Patients. A Case Report of Chondromyxoid Fibroma of the Nasal Cavity. Effects of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccines on Patients with Epilepsy: Real-Life Experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1