Warfarin Use in Nursing Home Residents: Results from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey

Parinaz K. Ghaswalla PhD, Spencer E. Harpe PharmD, PhD, MPH, Patricia W. Slattum PharmD, PhD
{"title":"Warfarin Use in Nursing Home Residents: Results from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey","authors":"Parinaz K. Ghaswalla PhD,&nbsp;Spencer E. Harpe PharmD, PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Patricia W. Slattum PharmD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>Practice guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy with warfarin for stroke prevention </span>in patients<span> with atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite this, warfarin is underused in older adults.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of AF in nursing home (NH) residents and the use of warfarin or other antiplatelet medications in NH residents with AF who have indications for and no contraindications against warfarin use. The secondary objective was to determine the factors associated with warfarin use in NH residents with AF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional analysis of prescription and resident data files from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey was performed. Residents with a diagnosis of AF were identified using <span><em>International Classification of Diseases</em><em>, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification</em></span> (ICD-9-CM) codes, and prescriptions of warfarin and antiplatelet medications were identified using Long-Term Care Drug Database System (LTCDDS) codes. Resident characteristics, stroke risk factors, and potential bleeding risk factors significant at <em>P</em> &lt; 0.10 in χ<sup>2</sup><span> analyses were entered in the final multiple logistic regression model to determine the factors associated with warfarin use.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>From 13,507 NH residents, 1904 (14%) had a diagnosis of AF and 1767 (13%) had a diagnosis of AF with indications for and no contraindications against warfarin use. Of these 1767 residents, 537 (30%) were prescribed warfarin, and of the remaining 1230 residents who were not prescribed warfarin, 283 (23%) received either aspirin<span><span><span> or clopidogrel. Thus, of 1767 residents with AF, with indications for and no contraindications to warfarin use, 947 (54%) residents did not receive any </span>antithrombotic therapy in the form of warfarin, aspirin, clopidogrel, or a combination of these medications. Factors that were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving warfarin were </span>congestive heart failure<span><span><span>, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack<span>, deep vein thrombosis or peripheral </span></span>embolus, </span>valvular heart disease, and total number of medications ≥6. Factors that were significantly associated with reduced odds of receiving warfarin were nonwhite race, history of </span></span></span>gastrointestinal bleeding, and use of antiplatelets (ie, clopidogrel).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>AF is common in NH residents, and more than half of the residents with AF who had indications for and no contraindications against warfarin use were not prescribed either warfarin or antiplatelets, such as aspirin or clopidogrel, suggesting that antithrombotic therapy may be underused in NH residents with AF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50811,"journal":{"name":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","volume":"10 1","pages":"Pages 25-36.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.12.001","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154359461100208X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Background

Practice guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Despite this, warfarin is underused in older adults.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of AF in nursing home (NH) residents and the use of warfarin or other antiplatelet medications in NH residents with AF who have indications for and no contraindications against warfarin use. The secondary objective was to determine the factors associated with warfarin use in NH residents with AF.

Methods

Cross-sectional analysis of prescription and resident data files from the 2004 National Nursing Home Survey was performed. Residents with a diagnosis of AF were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, and prescriptions of warfarin and antiplatelet medications were identified using Long-Term Care Drug Database System (LTCDDS) codes. Resident characteristics, stroke risk factors, and potential bleeding risk factors significant at P < 0.10 in χ2 analyses were entered in the final multiple logistic regression model to determine the factors associated with warfarin use.

Results

From 13,507 NH residents, 1904 (14%) had a diagnosis of AF and 1767 (13%) had a diagnosis of AF with indications for and no contraindications against warfarin use. Of these 1767 residents, 537 (30%) were prescribed warfarin, and of the remaining 1230 residents who were not prescribed warfarin, 283 (23%) received either aspirin or clopidogrel. Thus, of 1767 residents with AF, with indications for and no contraindications to warfarin use, 947 (54%) residents did not receive any antithrombotic therapy in the form of warfarin, aspirin, clopidogrel, or a combination of these medications. Factors that were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving warfarin were congestive heart failure, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, deep vein thrombosis or peripheral embolus, valvular heart disease, and total number of medications ≥6. Factors that were significantly associated with reduced odds of receiving warfarin were nonwhite race, history of gastrointestinal bleeding, and use of antiplatelets (ie, clopidogrel).

Conclusions

AF is common in NH residents, and more than half of the residents with AF who had indications for and no contraindications against warfarin use were not prescribed either warfarin or antiplatelets, such as aspirin or clopidogrel, suggesting that antithrombotic therapy may be underused in NH residents with AF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
华法林在养老院居民中的使用:2004年全国养老院调查的结果
实践指南推荐使用华法林抗凝治疗房颤(AF)患者预防卒中。尽管如此,华法林在老年人中使用不足。目的本研究的目的是确定养老院(NH)居民房颤的患病率,以及有华法林适应症和无华法林禁忌症的NH房颤患者华法林或其他抗血小板药物的使用情况。第二个目的是确定与NH住院患者af使用华法林相关的因素。方法对2004年全国养老院调查的处方和住院患者数据文件进行横断面分析。使用国际疾病分类第九版临床修改(ICD-9-CM)代码对诊断为房颤的居民进行识别,使用长期护理药物数据库系统(LTCDDS)代码对华法林和抗血小板药物处方进行识别。住院患者特征、卒中危险因素和潜在出血危险因素在P <中具有重要意义;在最终的多元logistic回归模型中,χ2分析输入0.10,以确定华法林使用的相关因素。结果13507例住院患者中,1904例(14%)诊断为房颤,1767例(13%)诊断为房颤,有华法林适应症和无华法林禁忌症。在这1767名居民中,537人(30%)服用了华法林,其余1230名未服用华法林的居民中,283人(23%)服用了阿司匹林或氯吡格雷。因此,在1767名有华法林适应症和无华法林禁禁症的房颤患者中,947名(54%)患者未接受华法林、阿司匹林、氯吡格雷或这些药物的联合抗血栓治疗。与接受华法林的几率增加显著相关的因素是充血性心力衰竭、既往中风或短暂性脑缺血发作、深静脉血栓形成或外周栓塞、瓣膜性心脏病以及总用药次数≥6。与接受华法林的几率降低显著相关的因素是非白人种族、胃肠道出血史和使用抗血小板药物(如氯吡格雷)。结论房颤在NH居民中很常见,超过一半有华法林适应症且无华法林禁忌症的房颤患者未开华法林或抗血小板药物(如阿司匹林或氯吡格雷),提示抗血栓治疗在NH房颤患者中可能使用不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author Index Subject Index Editorial Board Adverse Effects of Analgesics Commonly Used by Older Adults With Osteoarthritis: Focus on Non-Opioid and Opioid Analgesics Effect of Combination Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol or Inhaled Corticosteroids on Asthma-Related Outcomes in a Medicare-Eligible Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1