Skull bone flap fixation - reliability and efficacy of a new grip-like titanium device (Skull Grip) versus traditional sutures: a clinical randomized trial.

Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2011-10-01 Epub Date: 2012-01-25 DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1297246
S Chibbaro, O Makiese, D Bresson, S Hamdi, J F Cornelius, J P Guichard, A Reiss, S Bouazza, E Vicaut, A Ricci, R Galzio, P Poczos, B George, M Marsella, P Di Emidio
{"title":"Skull bone flap fixation - reliability and efficacy of a new grip-like titanium device (Skull Grip) versus traditional sutures: a clinical randomized trial.","authors":"S Chibbaro,&nbsp;O Makiese,&nbsp;D Bresson,&nbsp;S Hamdi,&nbsp;J F Cornelius,&nbsp;J P Guichard,&nbsp;A Reiss,&nbsp;S Bouazza,&nbsp;E Vicaut,&nbsp;A Ricci,&nbsp;R Galzio,&nbsp;P Poczos,&nbsp;B George,&nbsp;M Marsella,&nbsp;P Di Emidio","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1297246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After completing a craniotomy, it is important to replace the removed bone flap in its natural position in order to guarantee brain protection as well as improve cosmesis. A skull defect can expose the brain to accidental damage, and in cases of larger defects it may also cause the patients psychosocial problems. The ideal fixation device should provide reliable attachment of the flap to the skull and promote fast bony healing to avoid possible pseudo-arthrosis and/or osteolytic changes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a pilot randomized clinical trial on a series of 16 patients undergoing different craniotomies for benign brain lesions in which the bone flaps were replaced using traditional sutures (Prolene 0.0) in 8 cases and with a new skull fixation device (Skull Grip) in the other 8 (randomly allocated). All patients underwent CT scans of the head with 3D reconstruction at day 1 and day 90 postoperatively to evaluate bone flap position and fusion. These scans were independently reviewed by a neuroradiologist. Cosmesis was also evaluated clinically by the surgeon and radiologically by the neuroradiologist in the 2 patient groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The new \"Skull Grip\" device has shown stronger fixation qualities with optimal bone flap fusion and increased cosmetic healing features vs. traditional sutures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The \"Skull Grip\" has shown to be a reliable, effective and stronger bone flap fixation device when compared to traditional sutures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1297246","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1297246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: After completing a craniotomy, it is important to replace the removed bone flap in its natural position in order to guarantee brain protection as well as improve cosmesis. A skull defect can expose the brain to accidental damage, and in cases of larger defects it may also cause the patients psychosocial problems. The ideal fixation device should provide reliable attachment of the flap to the skull and promote fast bony healing to avoid possible pseudo-arthrosis and/or osteolytic changes.

Materials and methods: This is a pilot randomized clinical trial on a series of 16 patients undergoing different craniotomies for benign brain lesions in which the bone flaps were replaced using traditional sutures (Prolene 0.0) in 8 cases and with a new skull fixation device (Skull Grip) in the other 8 (randomly allocated). All patients underwent CT scans of the head with 3D reconstruction at day 1 and day 90 postoperatively to evaluate bone flap position and fusion. These scans were independently reviewed by a neuroradiologist. Cosmesis was also evaluated clinically by the surgeon and radiologically by the neuroradiologist in the 2 patient groups.

Results: The new "Skull Grip" device has shown stronger fixation qualities with optimal bone flap fusion and increased cosmetic healing features vs. traditional sutures.

Conclusion: The "Skull Grip" has shown to be a reliable, effective and stronger bone flap fixation device when compared to traditional sutures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅骨瓣固定:一种新型爪状钛装置(Skull Grip)与传统缝线的可靠性和有效性:一项临床随机试验。
背景:在开颅手术完成后,将切除的骨瓣置换到其自然位置是保证脑保护和改善美观的重要措施。颅骨缺损会使大脑受到意外损伤,如果颅骨缺损较大,还可能导致患者出现心理问题。理想的固定装置应提供可靠的皮瓣与颅骨的附着,并促进骨快速愈合,以避免可能的假性关节和/或溶骨改变。材料与方法:本研究是一项前瞻性随机临床试验,选取16例因脑良性病变行不同开颅术的患者,其中8例采用传统缝线(Prolene 0.0)替代骨瓣,8例(随机分配)采用新型颅骨固定装置(skull Grip)替代骨瓣。所有患者在术后第1天和第90天分别进行头部CT扫描和3D重建,以评估骨瓣的位置和融合情况。这些扫描结果由一位神经放射学家独立审查。外科医生对两组患者的美容进行了临床评估,神经放射学家对两组患者进行了放射学评估。结果:与传统缝线相比,新型“Skull Grip”装置具有更强的固定质量,具有最佳的骨瓣融合和更高的美容愈合功能。结论:与传统缝线相比,“颅骨夹”是一种可靠、有效、坚固的骨瓣固定装置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vidian nerve neurofibroma removed via a transpterygoid approach. Dual, minimally invasive fixation in acute, double, thoracic spine fracture. Massive swelling of Surgicel® Fibrillar™ hemostat after spinal surgery. Case report and a review of the literature. Endoscopic repair of CSF leaks in the postero-superior wall of the frontal sinus - report of 2 cases. Combined staged endoscopic and microsurgical approach of a third ventricular choroid plexus papilloma in an infant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1