Trans-lamina terminalis approach to third ventricle using supraorbital craniotomy: technique description and literature review for outcome comparison with anterior, lateral and trans-sphenoidal corridors.
V Krishna, B Blaker, L Kosnik, S Patel, W Vandergrift
{"title":"Trans-lamina terminalis approach to third ventricle using supraorbital craniotomy: technique description and literature review for outcome comparison with anterior, lateral and trans-sphenoidal corridors.","authors":"V Krishna, B Blaker, L Kosnik, S Patel, W Vandergrift","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1297996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The trans-lamina terminalis approach has been described to remove third ventricular tumors. Various surgical corridors for this approach include anterior (via bifrontal craniotomy), anterolateral (via supra-orbital craniotomy), lateral (via pterional craniotomy) and trans-sphenoidal corridors. Supra-orbital craniotomy offers a minimally invasive access for resection of third ventricular tumors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The trans-lamina terminalis technique through a supra-orbital craniotomy is described. Also, a literature review of clinical outcome data was performed for the comparison of different surgical corridors (anterior, antero-lateral, lateral, and trans-sphenoidal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operative steps and anatomic landmarks for supra-orbital craniotomy are discussed, along with 3 representative cases and respective outcomes. Gross total resection was achieved in 2 patients, and one patient required reoperation for recurrence. Based on the current literature, the clinical outcomes after supra-orbital craniotomy for trans-lamina terminalis approach are comparable to other surgical corridors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The supra-orbital craniotomy for trans-lamina terminalis approach is a valid surgical choice for third ventricular tumors. The major strengths of this approach include minimal brain retraction and direct end-on view; however, the long working distance is a major limitation. The clinical outcomes are comparable to other surgical corridors. Sound understanding of major strengths, limitations, and strategies for complication avoidance is necessary for its safe and effective application.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1297996","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1297996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
Background: The trans-lamina terminalis approach has been described to remove third ventricular tumors. Various surgical corridors for this approach include anterior (via bifrontal craniotomy), anterolateral (via supra-orbital craniotomy), lateral (via pterional craniotomy) and trans-sphenoidal corridors. Supra-orbital craniotomy offers a minimally invasive access for resection of third ventricular tumors.
Material and methods: The trans-lamina terminalis technique through a supra-orbital craniotomy is described. Also, a literature review of clinical outcome data was performed for the comparison of different surgical corridors (anterior, antero-lateral, lateral, and trans-sphenoidal).
Results: The operative steps and anatomic landmarks for supra-orbital craniotomy are discussed, along with 3 representative cases and respective outcomes. Gross total resection was achieved in 2 patients, and one patient required reoperation for recurrence. Based on the current literature, the clinical outcomes after supra-orbital craniotomy for trans-lamina terminalis approach are comparable to other surgical corridors.
Conclusions: The supra-orbital craniotomy for trans-lamina terminalis approach is a valid surgical choice for third ventricular tumors. The major strengths of this approach include minimal brain retraction and direct end-on view; however, the long working distance is a major limitation. The clinical outcomes are comparable to other surgical corridors. Sound understanding of major strengths, limitations, and strategies for complication avoidance is necessary for its safe and effective application.