Prevention of development of postoperative dysesthesia in transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation: floating retraction technique.

Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2011-10-01 Epub Date: 2012-01-27 DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1287774
J Y Cho, S-H Lee, H-Y Lee
{"title":"Prevention of development of postoperative dysesthesia in transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation: floating retraction technique.","authors":"J Y Cho,&nbsp;S-H Lee,&nbsp;H-Y Lee","doi":"10.1055/s-0031-1287774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has become a routine surgical procedure because it is minimally invasive. Perioperative complications such as dural injury, infection, nerve root irritation and recurrence can occur not only with PELD, but also with conventional open microsurgery. In contrast, post-operative dysesthesia (POD) due to existing dorsal root ganglion (DRG) injury is a unique complication of PELD. When POD occurs, even if the traversing root has been successfully decompressed, it hinders swift recovery and delays the return to daily routines. Thus, prevention of POD is the key to successful and widespread use of PELD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>From January 2006 to December 2008, 154 patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic discectomy by floating retraction technique at 160 disc levels under local anesthesia. This approach towards the superomedial border of the lower pedicle and the cannula can be placed by gentle retraction of the root with perineural fat instead of direct compression of dorsal root ganglion. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10 point) for radicular pain and low back pain, and using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional status. Perioperative complications and recurrence were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 45 years, the mean operative time was 36 min and the mean follow-up period was 3.4 years. The mean hospital stay for endoscopic discectomy was 1.8 days. No patient underwent repeated PELD or convert microsurgery by incomplete removal of the ruptured particle. All patients experienced early relief of symptoms, as determined by VAS and ODI. No patient developed POD. 1 patient experienced dural injury. There was 1 case of discitis. The recurrence rate was 1.95% (3 patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation is a safe and effective procedure. The floating retraction technique is recommended to avoid development of POD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49808,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0031-1287774","citationCount":"75","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1287774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

Abstract

Background: Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has become a routine surgical procedure because it is minimally invasive. Perioperative complications such as dural injury, infection, nerve root irritation and recurrence can occur not only with PELD, but also with conventional open microsurgery. In contrast, post-operative dysesthesia (POD) due to existing dorsal root ganglion (DRG) injury is a unique complication of PELD. When POD occurs, even if the traversing root has been successfully decompressed, it hinders swift recovery and delays the return to daily routines. Thus, prevention of POD is the key to successful and widespread use of PELD.

Material and methods: From January 2006 to December 2008, 154 patients underwent percutaneous endoscopic discectomy by floating retraction technique at 160 disc levels under local anesthesia. This approach towards the superomedial border of the lower pedicle and the cannula can be placed by gentle retraction of the root with perineural fat instead of direct compression of dorsal root ganglion. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10 point) for radicular pain and low back pain, and using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional status. Perioperative complications and recurrence were reviewed.

Results: The mean age was 45 years, the mean operative time was 36 min and the mean follow-up period was 3.4 years. The mean hospital stay for endoscopic discectomy was 1.8 days. No patient underwent repeated PELD or convert microsurgery by incomplete removal of the ruptured particle. All patients experienced early relief of symptoms, as determined by VAS and ODI. No patient developed POD. 1 patient experienced dural injury. There was 1 case of discitis. The recurrence rate was 1.95% (3 patients).

Conclusion: Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for intracanalicular lumbar disc herniation is a safe and effective procedure. The floating retraction technique is recommended to avoid development of POD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经椎间孔经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗椎管内腰椎间盘突出症的术后感觉不良的预防:浮动内收技术。
背景:经椎间孔经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)因其微创性已成为常规外科手术。硬脑膜损伤、感染、神经根刺激及复发等围手术期并发症不仅存在于PELD手术中,也存在于传统开放显微手术中。相比之下,由于存在背根神经节(DRG)损伤而导致的术后感觉障碍(POD)是PELD的独特并发症。当发生POD时,即使遍历根已成功解压缩,它也会阻碍快速恢复并延迟返回日常例程。因此,预防POD是成功和广泛应用PELD的关键。材料和方法:2006年1月至2008年12月,154例患者在局部麻醉下经皮经内镜下采用漂浮后收技术在160个椎间盘水平行椎间盘切除术。这种下椎弓根上内侧边界和套管的入路可以用神经周围脂肪轻轻牵拉根,而不是直接压迫背根神经节。临床结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS, 0-10分)评估神经根痛和腰痛,使用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估功能状态。回顾围手术期并发症及复发情况。结果:患者平均年龄45岁,平均手术时间36 min,平均随访时间3.4年。内镜下椎间盘切除术的平均住院时间为1.8天。没有患者接受重复PELD或不完全切除破裂颗粒的显微手术。根据VAS和ODI,所有患者均经历了早期症状缓解。无患者出现POD。1例患者出现硬脑膜损伤。椎间盘炎1例。复发率1.95%(3例)。结论:经椎间孔经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗椎间孔内腰椎间盘突出症是一种安全有效的手术方法。建议采用浮式内收技术,避免发生脱臼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vidian nerve neurofibroma removed via a transpterygoid approach. Dual, minimally invasive fixation in acute, double, thoracic spine fracture. Massive swelling of Surgicel® Fibrillar™ hemostat after spinal surgery. Case report and a review of the literature. Endoscopic repair of CSF leaks in the postero-superior wall of the frontal sinus - report of 2 cases. Combined staged endoscopic and microsurgical approach of a third ventricular choroid plexus papilloma in an infant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1