Risk of Falls and Fractures in Older Adults Using Atypical Antipsychotic Agents: A Propensity Score–Adjusted, Retrospective Cohort Study

Satabdi Chatterjee BPharm, MS, Hua Chen MD, PhD, Michael L. Johnson PhD, Rajender R. Aparasu MPharm, PhD
{"title":"Risk of Falls and Fractures in Older Adults Using Atypical Antipsychotic Agents: A Propensity Score–Adjusted, Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Satabdi Chatterjee BPharm, MS,&nbsp;Hua Chen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Michael L. Johnson PhD,&nbsp;Rajender R. Aparasu MPharm, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Atypical antipsychotic agents<span><span> are extensively prescribed in the elderly to treat various behavioral and psychiatric disorders. Past literature has documented an increased risk of falls and factures with the use of risperidone and </span>olanzapine compared with nonuse. However, none of the studies assessed the comparative safety profiles of atypical agents with respect to falls and fractures.</span></p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The goal of this study was to evaluate the risk of falls and fractures associated with the use of risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine in community-dwelling adults aged ≥50 years.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study involved a propensity score–adjusted approach in new users of risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine anytime between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2008, using data from the IMS LifeLink Health Plan Claims database. Patients were followed up until a hospitalization/emergency department visit for fall/fracture or the end of the study period, whichever occurred earlier. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the comparative risk of falls/fractures. The covariates in the final model included propensity scores and their interaction terms.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>There were 12,145 new users of atypical agents in the study population (5083 risperidone, 4377 olanzapine, and 2685 quetiapine). A total of 417 cases of falls/fractures with at least 1 hospitalization/ emergency department visit after the use of the </span>antipsychotic agents were identified. The number of falls for risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine were 179 (3.56%), 123 (2.84%), and 115 (4.34%), respectively. After adjusting for propensity scores, the Cox proportional hazards model showed that there was no statistically significant difference with use of risperidone (hazard ratio = 1.10 [95% CI, 0.86–1.39]) or quetiapine (hazard ratio = 1.12 [95% CI, 0.86–1.46]) compared with olanzapine (reference group) in the risk of falls or fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study found no significant difference across the individual atypical agents in the risk of falls/fractures in community-dwelling older adults. Future studies are required to evaluate the overall safety profiles of the antipsychotic agents in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50811,"journal":{"name":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 83-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.10.006","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1543594611001784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Background

Atypical antipsychotic agents are extensively prescribed in the elderly to treat various behavioral and psychiatric disorders. Past literature has documented an increased risk of falls and factures with the use of risperidone and olanzapine compared with nonuse. However, none of the studies assessed the comparative safety profiles of atypical agents with respect to falls and fractures.

Objective

The goal of this study was to evaluate the risk of falls and fractures associated with the use of risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine in community-dwelling adults aged ≥50 years.

Methods

The study involved a propensity score–adjusted approach in new users of risperidone, olanzapine, or quetiapine anytime between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2008, using data from the IMS LifeLink Health Plan Claims database. Patients were followed up until a hospitalization/emergency department visit for fall/fracture or the end of the study period, whichever occurred earlier. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to evaluate the comparative risk of falls/fractures. The covariates in the final model included propensity scores and their interaction terms.

Results

There were 12,145 new users of atypical agents in the study population (5083 risperidone, 4377 olanzapine, and 2685 quetiapine). A total of 417 cases of falls/fractures with at least 1 hospitalization/ emergency department visit after the use of the antipsychotic agents were identified. The number of falls for risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine were 179 (3.56%), 123 (2.84%), and 115 (4.34%), respectively. After adjusting for propensity scores, the Cox proportional hazards model showed that there was no statistically significant difference with use of risperidone (hazard ratio = 1.10 [95% CI, 0.86–1.39]) or quetiapine (hazard ratio = 1.12 [95% CI, 0.86–1.46]) compared with olanzapine (reference group) in the risk of falls or fractures.

Conclusions

The study found no significant difference across the individual atypical agents in the risk of falls/fractures in community-dwelling older adults. Future studies are required to evaluate the overall safety profiles of the antipsychotic agents in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用非典型抗精神病药物的老年人跌倒和骨折的风险:一项倾向评分调整的回顾性队列研究
典型的抗精神病药物在老年人中被广泛用于治疗各种行为和精神疾病。既往文献表明,与不使用利培酮和奥氮平相比,使用利培酮和奥氮平会增加跌倒和骨折的风险。然而,没有一项研究评估了非典型药物在跌倒和骨折方面的相对安全性。目的:本研究的目的是评估≥50岁社区居民使用利培酮、奥氮平和喹硫平相关的跌倒和骨折风险。方法:本研究采用倾向评分调整方法,对2000年7月1日至2008年6月30日期间利培酮、奥氮平或喹硫平的新使用者进行研究,使用IMS LifeLink健康计划索赔数据库中的数据。对患者进行随访,直到因跌倒/骨折住院/急诊科就诊或研究期结束(以较早者为准)。采用Cox比例风险回归模型评估跌倒/骨折的比较风险。最终模型中的协变量包括倾向得分及其相互作用项。结果研究人群中新使用非典型药物12145例(利培酮5083例,奥氮平4377例,喹硫平2685例)。共有417例跌倒/骨折患者在使用抗精神病药物后至少住院/急诊1次。利培酮、奥氮平和喹硫平分别为179例(3.56%)、123例(2.84%)和115例(4.34%)。在调整倾向评分后,Cox比例风险模型显示,使用利培酮(风险比= 1.10 [95% CI, 0.86-1.39])或喹硫平(风险比= 1.12 [95% CI, 0.86-1.46])与奥氮平(参照组)相比,跌倒或骨折的风险无统计学差异。结论:该研究发现,在社区居住的老年人中,个体非典型因子在跌倒/骨折风险方面没有显著差异。未来的研究需要评估抗精神病药物在这一人群中的总体安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy
American Journal Geriatric Pharmacotherapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Author Index Subject Index Editorial Board Adverse Effects of Analgesics Commonly Used by Older Adults With Osteoarthritis: Focus on Non-Opioid and Opioid Analgesics Effect of Combination Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol or Inhaled Corticosteroids on Asthma-Related Outcomes in a Medicare-Eligible Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1