Negotiating the boundary between paid and unpaid hospice workers: a qualitative study of how hospice volunteers understand their work.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-02-05 DOI:10.1177/1049909111435695
Sarah E Field-Richards, Antony Arthur
{"title":"Negotiating the boundary between paid and unpaid hospice workers: a qualitative study of how hospice volunteers understand their work.","authors":"Sarah E Field-Richards,&nbsp;Antony Arthur","doi":"10.1177/1049909111435695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the nurse-volunteer relationship in a day hospice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Underpinned by an interpretive approach, face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 day hospice volunteers.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The nature and dynamics of the relationship between nursing staff and volunteers within the day hospice were characterized by increasing formality and changes in the division of labor, which challenged smooth working relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Volunteers see their role as becoming increasingly formalized partly as a response to increasing administrative demands on hospice nurses. The willingness of volunteers to take on new roles is variable. For volunteers to feel secure and valued and working relationships to remain strong, the process of how boundaries between paid and unpaid workers are negotiated needs to be transparent.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":"29 8","pages":"627-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1049909111435695","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909111435695","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objective: To explore the nurse-volunteer relationship in a day hospice.

Method: Underpinned by an interpretive approach, face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 day hospice volunteers.

Findings: The nature and dynamics of the relationship between nursing staff and volunteers within the day hospice were characterized by increasing formality and changes in the division of labor, which challenged smooth working relationships.

Conclusions: Volunteers see their role as becoming increasingly formalized partly as a response to increasing administrative demands on hospice nurses. The willingness of volunteers to take on new roles is variable. For volunteers to feel secure and valued and working relationships to remain strong, the process of how boundaries between paid and unpaid workers are negotiated needs to be transparent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协商有偿与无偿安宁疗护工作者之间的界限:安宁疗护志愿者如何理解其工作的质性研究。
目的:探讨日间安宁疗护中护士与志愿者的关系。方法:以解释法为基础,对12天安宁疗护志愿者进行面对面半结构式访谈。研究结果:日间安宁疗护人员与志工关系的性质与动态,呈现渐趋正式、分工变化的特点,对顺畅的工作关系构成挑战。结论:志愿者认为他们的角色变得越来越正式,部分是对临终关怀护士日益增加的行政要求的回应。志愿者承担新角色的意愿是可变的。为了让志愿者感到安全和受到重视,为了保持牢固的工作关系,有薪和无薪员工之间的界限谈判过程需要透明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Corrrigendum to Palliative Sedation Therapy Practice Comparison - A Survey of Pediatric Palliative Care and Pain Management Specialists. Erratum. Using the LACE Score as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Referred for Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation: A Single-Center Experience. CORRIGENDUM to Courvoisier's Law (updated to Cheyne-Stokes Breathing). Corrigendum to Outcomes of Airway Stents in the Palliative Care of Patients With Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1