Surface characterization of SLActive dental implants.

Spiros Zinelis, Nick Silikas, Andrew Thomas, Karen Syres, George Eliades
{"title":"Surface characterization of SLActive dental implants.","authors":"Spiros Zinelis,&nbsp;Nick Silikas,&nbsp;Andrew Thomas,&nbsp;Karen Syres,&nbsp;George Eliades","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to characterize the surface chemistry, hydration capacity, topography and roughness of the root part of a hydrophilic sandblasted and acid-etched titanium dental implant (SLActive). Implants as received (SAR), after water rinsing (SAW) and after ultrasonication in water (SAU) were subjected to x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) elemental and binding state analysis. Scanning electron microscopy plus energy dispersive x-ray microanalysis (SEM/EDX), reflection Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (RFTIRM) and hydration/ dehydration cycling by environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), were performed in SAR, whereas SAU implants were subjected to 3D-optical profilometry and SEM. For all the experiments, a conventional sandblasted and acid-etched implant (SLA ) of the same manufacturer was used as control. XPS showed lower mean C content in SAR than SLA, but not significantly different. In SAW, the C and O contents were increased. Significantly reduced C and increased Ti and O contents were found in SAU. Residual Na phases, other than NaCl, were traced in all SLActive groups. SAR demonstrated higher [-OH]/O2- ratio than SLA . EDX documented higher O, Na, Cl and lower Ti content in SAR. More -OH contributions were probed on SAR in comparison with SLA by RFTI RM. Ti-O peaks assigned to anatase, rutile and amorphous phases were found in both implant groups. The ESEM study revealed a full rehydration capacity in SAR, in contrast to SLA. No differences were found in the topography of SAU and SLA implant surfaces under the SEM. However, significantly greater values in spatial and functional roughness parameters were encountered in SAU. The increased surface hydroxylated titanium content and the greater spatial and functional roughness parameters, may explain the enhanced biological activity documented for SLActive in comparison with SLA.</p>","PeriodicalId":88322,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"72-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to characterize the surface chemistry, hydration capacity, topography and roughness of the root part of a hydrophilic sandblasted and acid-etched titanium dental implant (SLActive). Implants as received (SAR), after water rinsing (SAW) and after ultrasonication in water (SAU) were subjected to x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) elemental and binding state analysis. Scanning electron microscopy plus energy dispersive x-ray microanalysis (SEM/EDX), reflection Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy (RFTIRM) and hydration/ dehydration cycling by environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), were performed in SAR, whereas SAU implants were subjected to 3D-optical profilometry and SEM. For all the experiments, a conventional sandblasted and acid-etched implant (SLA ) of the same manufacturer was used as control. XPS showed lower mean C content in SAR than SLA, but not significantly different. In SAW, the C and O contents were increased. Significantly reduced C and increased Ti and O contents were found in SAU. Residual Na phases, other than NaCl, were traced in all SLActive groups. SAR demonstrated higher [-OH]/O2- ratio than SLA . EDX documented higher O, Na, Cl and lower Ti content in SAR. More -OH contributions were probed on SAR in comparison with SLA by RFTI RM. Ti-O peaks assigned to anatase, rutile and amorphous phases were found in both implant groups. The ESEM study revealed a full rehydration capacity in SAR, in contrast to SLA. No differences were found in the topography of SAU and SLA implant surfaces under the SEM. However, significantly greater values in spatial and functional roughness parameters were encountered in SAU. The increased surface hydroxylated titanium content and the greater spatial and functional roughness parameters, may explain the enhanced biological activity documented for SLActive in comparison with SLA.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SLActive牙种植体的表面表征。
本研究的目的是表征亲水喷砂酸蚀钛牙种植体(SLActive)的表面化学、水化能力、形貌和根部粗糙度。采用x射线光电子能谱(XPS)对植入物进行元素和结合态分析(SAR)、水洗后(SAW)和水中超声处理后(SAU)。扫描电子显微镜和能量色散x射线微分析(SEM/EDX)、反射傅里叶变换红外微光谱(RFTIRM)以及环境扫描电子显微镜(ESEM)进行水合/脱水循环,而SAU植入物则进行3d光学轮廓术和扫描电子显微镜。所有实验均采用同一厂家的常规喷砂酸蚀种植体(SLA)作为对照。XPS结果显示SAR的平均C含量低于SLA,但差异不显著。在SAW中,C和O含量增加。SAU显著降低了C含量,增加了Ti和O含量。除NaCl外,所有SLActive组均有残留的Na相。SAR的[- oh]/O2-比值高于SLA。EDX在SAR中的O、Na、Cl含量较高,Ti含量较低。与SLA相比,RFTI RM对SAR的oh贡献更大。在两组植入物中均发现了锐钛矿、金红石和非晶相的钛氧峰。ESEM研究显示,与SLA相比,SAR具有完全的再水化能力。扫描电镜下SAU和SLA种植体表面形貌无明显差异。然而,在SAU中遇到的空间和功能粗糙度参数值要大得多。表面羟基化钛含量的增加以及空间和功能粗糙度参数的增大,可能解释了SLActive与SLA相比生物活性的增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biologically oriented dentistry. Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): a new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontically healthy teeth. Modified two-stage procedures for the treatment of gingival recession. Esthetic direct restorations in endodontically treated anterior teeth. Modern treatment planning approach facing a failure of conventional treatment. Part II: case report and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1