Early experience with diagnosis and management of eroded gastric bands.

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2011-12-27 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2012.82.1.18
Chang Ik Yoon, Kyung Ho Pak, Seong Min Kim
{"title":"Early experience with diagnosis and management of eroded gastric bands.","authors":"Chang Ik Yoon,&nbsp;Kyung Ho Pak,&nbsp;Seong Min Kim","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2012.82.1.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Band erosion is a well-known complication of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement. We gained experience with laparoscopic removal of an eroded gastric band.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the operative log of our obesity surgery unit to identify all operations performed for band erosion from March 2009 to May 2011.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, a total of six of 96 patients (6.3%), five females and one male, were diagnosed with band erosion and underwent surgical removal of the band system. The median time interval from the initial gastric band placement to the diagnosis of band erosion was 8.5 months (range, 7 to 22 months), with most band erosion occurring within the first year (5/6, 83%). The median body mass index at band removal was 28.4 kg/m(2). Upper abdominal pain was the most common symptom (5/6, 83%), and other signs and symptoms were port site infection (3/6, 50%) and loss of restriction and weight regain (1/6, 17%). All eroded bands were removed using laparoscopy. Further complications after laparoscopic removal of the band system were observed in three cases. One patient showed multiple intra-abdominal abscesses requiring insertion of a pigtail catheter for drainage. The other two patients experienced sepsis with localized peritonitis, eventually requiring laparoscopic washout and drainage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gastric band erosion requires the removal of the gastric band. Laparoscopic removal is technically achievable in the majority of patients with eroded gastric band. The method can be challenging, has potential postoperative complications (fistula, abscess), and should be attempted only by experienced surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":49157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"82 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.1.18","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.1.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Purpose: Band erosion is a well-known complication of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement. We gained experience with laparoscopic removal of an eroded gastric band.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the operative log of our obesity surgery unit to identify all operations performed for band erosion from March 2009 to May 2011.

Results: During the study period, a total of six of 96 patients (6.3%), five females and one male, were diagnosed with band erosion and underwent surgical removal of the band system. The median time interval from the initial gastric band placement to the diagnosis of band erosion was 8.5 months (range, 7 to 22 months), with most band erosion occurring within the first year (5/6, 83%). The median body mass index at band removal was 28.4 kg/m(2). Upper abdominal pain was the most common symptom (5/6, 83%), and other signs and symptoms were port site infection (3/6, 50%) and loss of restriction and weight regain (1/6, 17%). All eroded bands were removed using laparoscopy. Further complications after laparoscopic removal of the band system were observed in three cases. One patient showed multiple intra-abdominal abscesses requiring insertion of a pigtail catheter for drainage. The other two patients experienced sepsis with localized peritonitis, eventually requiring laparoscopic washout and drainage.

Conclusion: Gastric band erosion requires the removal of the gastric band. Laparoscopic removal is technically achievable in the majority of patients with eroded gastric band. The method can be challenging, has potential postoperative complications (fistula, abscess), and should be attempted only by experienced surgeons.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胃带糜烂的早期诊断与治疗体会。
目的:胃带糜烂是腹腔镜可调节胃带置入的常见并发症。我们获得了腹腔镜切除胃带糜烂的经验。方法:我们回顾性回顾我院肥胖外科科室2009年3月至2011年5月间所有因腕带糜烂进行的手术记录。结果:在研究期间,96例患者中有6例(6.3%),其中女性5例,男性1例,被诊断为带糜烂并行手术切除带系统。从最初放置胃带到诊断胃带糜烂的中位时间间隔为8.5个月(范围7至22个月),大多数胃带糜烂发生在第一年(5/ 6,83%)。去除条带时的中位体重指数为28.4 kg/m(2)。上腹部疼痛是最常见的症状(5/6,83%),其他体征和症状为端口感染(3/6,50%)和限制丧失和体重恢复(1/6,17%)。所有糜烂带均采用腹腔镜切除。进一步的并发症,腹腔镜下切除带系统后观察到三例。1例患者出现多发腹内脓肿,需要插入细尾导管引流。另外两名患者出现败血症并局限性腹膜炎,最终需要腹腔镜冲洗和引流。结论:胃带糜烂需要切除胃带。在大多数胃带糜烂的患者中,腹腔镜切除在技术上是可以实现的。该方法具有挑战性,有潜在的术后并发症(瘘管、脓肿),只能由经验丰富的外科医生尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary team approach in breast cancer: a nationwide survey in Korea. Impact of pretransplant rituximab induction on highly sensitized kidney recipients: comparison with non-rituximab group. Influence of gastrectomy for stomach cancer on type 2 diabetes mellitus for patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m(2). Influence of surgical manipulation and surgical modality on the molecular detection of circulating tumor cells from colorectal cancer. Ten year outcomes after bypass surgery in aortoiliac occlusive disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1