Application of single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomy in children.

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2012-02-01 Epub Date: 2012-01-27 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.110
Dong Baek Kang, Seung Hyun Lee, Seok Youn Lee, Jung Taek Oh, Dong Eun Park, Cheol Lee, Duk Hwa Choi, Won Cheol Park, Jeong Kyun Lee
{"title":"Application of single incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomy in children.","authors":"Dong Baek Kang,&nbsp;Seung Hyun Lee,&nbsp;Seok Youn Lee,&nbsp;Jung Taek Oh,&nbsp;Dong Eun Park,&nbsp;Cheol Lee,&nbsp;Duk Hwa Choi,&nbsp;Won Cheol Park,&nbsp;Jeong Kyun Lee","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recently, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been popular in use with its progress studied for more minimally invasive surgery and cosmetic improvement. We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of SILS for appendectomy (SILS-A) in children and compare it with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (C-LA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied, retrospectively, adolescent patients who underwent C-LA or SILS-A. There were 25 patients in the C-LA group and 30 patients in the SILS-A group. The clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SILS-A procedures were performed successfully in adolescent patients . There were no significant difference between the C-LA and SILS-A group with respect to demographic data and post-operative outcomes. There was one complication (4%) in the C-LA group and two complications (6.6%) in the SILS-A group, but there was no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SILS-A was technically feasible and safe in children. Considering little postoperative scar and no difference in post-operative outcomes compared to C-LA, SILA could be applicable in adolescent patients. Larger studies and further technical implements will be necessary to assess the true benefit of this approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":49157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"82 2","pages":"110-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.110","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.2.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been popular in use with its progress studied for more minimally invasive surgery and cosmetic improvement. We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of SILS for appendectomy (SILS-A) in children and compare it with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (C-LA).

Methods: We studied, retrospectively, adolescent patients who underwent C-LA or SILS-A. There were 25 patients in the C-LA group and 30 patients in the SILS-A group. The clinical outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results: The SILS-A procedures were performed successfully in adolescent patients . There were no significant difference between the C-LA and SILS-A group with respect to demographic data and post-operative outcomes. There was one complication (4%) in the C-LA group and two complications (6.6%) in the SILS-A group, but there was no significant difference.

Conclusion: SILS-A was technically feasible and safe in children. Considering little postoperative scar and no difference in post-operative outcomes compared to C-LA, SILA could be applicable in adolescent patients. Larger studies and further technical implements will be necessary to assess the true benefit of this approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单切口腹腔镜手术在儿童阑尾切除术中的应用。
目的:近年来,单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)的应用越来越广泛,其研究进展也越来越多地用于微创手术和美容改善。我们探讨SILS在儿童阑尾切除术(SILS- a)中的可行性和疗效,并与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术(C-LA)进行比较。方法:我们回顾性研究了接受C-LA或SILS-A的青少年患者。C-LA组25例,SILS-A组30例。比较两组临床结果。结果:青少年患者行SILS-A手术均成功。C-LA组和SILS-A组在人口学数据和术后结果方面没有显著差异。C-LA组出现1例并发症(4%),sls - a组出现2例并发症(6.6%),差异无统计学意义。结论:sls - a在技术上是可行且安全的。考虑到与C-LA相比,SILA术后瘢痕小,术后预后无差异,SILA可适用于青少年患者。需要更大规模的研究和进一步的技术实施来评估这种方法的真正好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary team approach in breast cancer: a nationwide survey in Korea. Impact of pretransplant rituximab induction on highly sensitized kidney recipients: comparison with non-rituximab group. Influence of gastrectomy for stomach cancer on type 2 diabetes mellitus for patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m(2). Influence of surgical manipulation and surgical modality on the molecular detection of circulating tumor cells from colorectal cancer. Ten year outcomes after bypass surgery in aortoiliac occlusive disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1