Russian Federation. Health system review.

Q1 Medicine Health systems in transition Pub Date : 2011-01-01
Larisa Popovich, Elena Potapchik, Sergey Shishkin, Erica Richardson, Alexandra Vacroux, Benoit Mathivet
{"title":"Russian Federation. Health system review.","authors":"Larisa Popovich,&nbsp;Elena Potapchik,&nbsp;Sergey Shishkin,&nbsp;Erica Richardson,&nbsp;Alexandra Vacroux,&nbsp;Benoit Mathivet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The HiT reviews are country-based reports that provide a detailed description of a health system and of policy initiatives in progress or under development. HiTs examine different approaches to the organization, financing and delivery of health services and the role of the main actors in health systems; describe the institutional framework, process, content and implementation of health and health care policies; and highlight challenges and areas that require more in-depth analysis. At independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, the Russian health system inherited an extensive, centralized Semashko system, but was quick to reform health financing by adopting a mandatory health insurance (MHI) model in 1993. MHI was introduced in order to open up an earmarked stream of funding for health care in the face of severe fiscal constraints. While the health system has evolved and changed significantly since the early 1990 s, the legacy of having been a highly centralized system focused on universal access to basic care remains. High energy prices on world markets have ensured greater macroeconomic stability, a budget surplus and improvements in living standards for most of the Russian population. However, despite an overall reduction in the poverty rate, there is a marked urban rural split and rural populations have worse health and poorer access to health services than urban populations. The increase in budgetary resources available to policy-makers have led to a number of recent federal-level health programmes that have focused on the delivery of services and increasing funding for priority areas including primary care provision in rural areas. Nevertheless, public health spending in the Russian Federation remains relatively low given the resources available. However, it is also clear that, even with the current level of financing, the performance of the health system could be improved. Provider payment mechanisms are the main obstacle to improving technical efficiency in the Russian health system, as most budget funding channelled through local government is input based. For this reason, the most recent reforms as well as legislation in the pipeline seek to ensure all health care funding is channelled through a strengthened MHI system with contracts for provider payments being made using output-based measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":38995,"journal":{"name":"Health systems in transition","volume":"13 7","pages":"1-190, xiii-xiv"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems in transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The HiT reviews are country-based reports that provide a detailed description of a health system and of policy initiatives in progress or under development. HiTs examine different approaches to the organization, financing and delivery of health services and the role of the main actors in health systems; describe the institutional framework, process, content and implementation of health and health care policies; and highlight challenges and areas that require more in-depth analysis. At independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, the Russian health system inherited an extensive, centralized Semashko system, but was quick to reform health financing by adopting a mandatory health insurance (MHI) model in 1993. MHI was introduced in order to open up an earmarked stream of funding for health care in the face of severe fiscal constraints. While the health system has evolved and changed significantly since the early 1990 s, the legacy of having been a highly centralized system focused on universal access to basic care remains. High energy prices on world markets have ensured greater macroeconomic stability, a budget surplus and improvements in living standards for most of the Russian population. However, despite an overall reduction in the poverty rate, there is a marked urban rural split and rural populations have worse health and poorer access to health services than urban populations. The increase in budgetary resources available to policy-makers have led to a number of recent federal-level health programmes that have focused on the delivery of services and increasing funding for priority areas including primary care provision in rural areas. Nevertheless, public health spending in the Russian Federation remains relatively low given the resources available. However, it is also clear that, even with the current level of financing, the performance of the health system could be improved. Provider payment mechanisms are the main obstacle to improving technical efficiency in the Russian health system, as most budget funding channelled through local government is input based. For this reason, the most recent reforms as well as legislation in the pipeline seek to ensure all health care funding is channelled through a strengthened MHI system with contracts for provider payments being made using output-based measures.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
俄罗斯联邦。卫生系统审查。
HiT审查是基于国家的报告,详细描述了卫生系统以及正在进行或正在制定的政策举措。HiTs审查组织、筹资和提供卫生服务的不同方法以及卫生系统中主要行为体的作用;描述卫生和保健政策的体制框架、过程、内容和实施;并强调需要更深入分析的挑战和领域。1991年脱离苏联独立后,俄罗斯卫生系统继承了一个广泛的、集中的Semashko系统,但在1993年通过采用强制性健康保险(MHI)模式,迅速改革了卫生筹资。实行MHI是为了在面临严重财政限制的情况下,开辟一条专门用于保健的资金流。虽然卫生系统自20世纪90年代初以来发生了重大演变和变化,但高度集中、注重普遍获得基本保健的遗留问题仍然存在。世界市场的高能源价格确保了更大的宏观经济稳定、预算盈余和大多数俄罗斯人生活水平的提高。然而,尽管贫困率总体上有所下降,但城乡分化明显,农村人口的健康状况比城市人口差,获得保健服务的机会比城市人口少。决策者可获得的预算资源增加,导致最近一些联邦一级的保健方案侧重于提供服务和增加对优先领域的供资,包括在农村地区提供初级保健。然而,鉴于现有资源,俄罗斯联邦的公共卫生支出仍然相对较低。然而,同样明显的是,即使以目前的筹资水平,卫生系统的绩效也可以得到改善。提供者支付机制是提高俄罗斯卫生系统技术效率的主要障碍,因为通过地方政府提供的大多数预算资金是以投入为基础的。因此,最近的改革以及正在筹备中的立法都力求确保所有卫生保健资金都通过加强的MHI系统提供,并采用基于产出的措施向提供者支付合同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health systems in transition
Health systems in transition Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Denmark: Health System Review. Estonia: Health System Review. Sweden: Health System Review. France: Health System Review. Health and Care Data: Approaches to data linkage for evidence-informed policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1