L(+) and D(-) lactate are increased in plasma and urine samples of type 2 diabetes as measured by a simultaneous quantification of L(+) and D(-) lactate by reversed-phase liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Experimental Diabetes Research Pub Date : 2012-01-01 Epub Date: 2012-03-08 DOI:10.1155/2012/234812
Jean L J M Scheijen, Nordin M J Hanssen, Marjo P H van de Waarenburg, Daisy M A E Jonkers, Coen D A Stehouwer, Casper G Schalkwijk
{"title":"L(+) and D(-) lactate are increased in plasma and urine samples of type 2 diabetes as measured by a simultaneous quantification of L(+) and D(-) lactate by reversed-phase liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.","authors":"Jean L J M Scheijen,&nbsp;Nordin M J Hanssen,&nbsp;Marjo P H van de Waarenburg,&nbsp;Daisy M A E Jonkers,&nbsp;Coen D A Stehouwer,&nbsp;Casper G Schalkwijk","doi":"10.1155/2012/234812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasma and urinary levels of D-lactate have been linked to the presence of diabetes. Previously developed techniques have shown several limitations to further evaluate D-lactate as a biomarker for this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>D- and L-lactate were quantified using ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with labelled internal standard. Samples were derivatized with diacetyl-L-tartaric anhydride and separated on a C(18)-reversed phase column. D- and L-lactate were analysed in plasma and urine of controls, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis of D- and L-lactate was achieved successfully. Calibration curves were linear (r(2) > 0.99) over the physiological and pathophysiological ranges. Recoveries for urine and plasma were between 96% and 113%. Inter- and intra-assay variations were between 2% and 9%. The limits of detection of D-lactate and L-lactate in plasma were 0.7 μmol/L and 0.2 μmol/L, respectively. The limits of detection of D-lactate and L-lactate in urine were 8.1 nmol/mmol creatinine and 4.4 nmol/mmol creatinine, respectively. Plasma and urinary levels of D- and L-lactate were increased in patients with IBD and T2DM as compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presented method proved to be suitable for the quantification of D- and L-lactate and opens the possibility to explore the use of D-lactate as a biomarker.</p>","PeriodicalId":12109,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Diabetes Research","volume":"2012 ","pages":"234812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2012/234812","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Diabetes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/234812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

Background: Plasma and urinary levels of D-lactate have been linked to the presence of diabetes. Previously developed techniques have shown several limitations to further evaluate D-lactate as a biomarker for this condition.

Methods: D- and L-lactate were quantified using ultraperformance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with labelled internal standard. Samples were derivatized with diacetyl-L-tartaric anhydride and separated on a C(18)-reversed phase column. D- and L-lactate were analysed in plasma and urine of controls, patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Results: Quantitative analysis of D- and L-lactate was achieved successfully. Calibration curves were linear (r(2) > 0.99) over the physiological and pathophysiological ranges. Recoveries for urine and plasma were between 96% and 113%. Inter- and intra-assay variations were between 2% and 9%. The limits of detection of D-lactate and L-lactate in plasma were 0.7 μmol/L and 0.2 μmol/L, respectively. The limits of detection of D-lactate and L-lactate in urine were 8.1 nmol/mmol creatinine and 4.4 nmol/mmol creatinine, respectively. Plasma and urinary levels of D- and L-lactate were increased in patients with IBD and T2DM as compared with controls.

Conclusion: The presented method proved to be suitable for the quantification of D- and L-lactate and opens the possibility to explore the use of D-lactate as a biomarker.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过反相液相色谱串联质谱同时定量L(+)和D(-)乳酸测定,2型糖尿病患者血浆和尿液样品中的L(+)和D(-)乳酸增加。
背景:血浆和尿中d -乳酸水平与糖尿病有关。先前开发的技术在进一步评估d -乳酸作为这种疾病的生物标志物方面显示出一些局限性。方法:采用内标超高效液相色谱串联质谱法定量测定D-乳酸和l -乳酸。样品用二乙酰- l-酒石酸酐衍生,在C(18)反相柱上分离。分析了对照组、炎症性肠病(IBD)患者和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血浆和尿液中的D-和l -乳酸。结果:D-和l -乳酸的定量分析成功。校正曲线在生理和病理生理范围内呈线性关系(r(2) > 0.99)。尿液和血浆的回收率在96% ~ 113%之间。测定间和测定内的变异在2%到9%之间。血浆中d -乳酸和L-乳酸的检出限分别为0.7 μmol/L和0.2 μmol/L。尿中d -乳酸和l -乳酸的检出限分别为8.1 nmol/mmol肌酐和4.4 nmol/mmol肌酐。与对照组相比,IBD和T2DM患者血浆和尿中D-和l -乳酸水平升高。结论:该方法适用于D-乳酸和l -乳酸的定量测定,为D-乳酸作为生物标志物的应用开辟了可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Diabetes Research
Experimental Diabetes Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nontraditional Therapy of Diabetes and Its Complications In Vitro Investigation and Evaluation of Novel Drug Based on Polyherbal Extract against Type 2 Diabetes Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Type 2 Diabetes in Elderly Patients Aged 45-80 Years at Kanungu District Erratum to “Circulating Levels of MicroRNA from Children with Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes and Healthy Controls: Evidence That miR-25 Associates to Residual Beta-Cell Function and Glycaemic Control during Disease Progression” A PEDF-derived peptide inhibits retinal neovascularization and blocks mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1