Living donor liver transplantation: ethical considerations.

Charles M Miller, Martin L Smith, Teresa Diago Uso
{"title":"Living donor liver transplantation: ethical considerations.","authors":"Charles M Miller,&nbsp;Martin L Smith,&nbsp;Teresa Diago Uso","doi":"10.1002/msj.21299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most solid-organ transplants performed in the Western world are from deceased donors. In the last decade, deceased donation rates have reached a plateau as the number of patients with end-stage organ disease has steadily increased, resulting in a large discrepancy between organ supply and demand. Living donor transplantation is one way to decrease this discrepancy. However, living donation is not universally accepted. For instance, living donation rates vary geographically (eg, living donation is more accepted in Asia than in the Western world) and depend on the organ donated (eg, kidney versus liver donation). In this article we will review the ethical principles guiding living donor liver transplantation, with emphasis on justification and safeguards that support the practice of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, the most clinically and ethically challenging type of living organ donation. Our ethical justification will include a presentation of triangular or tripartite equipoise, a framework that aims to balance donor safety, expected recipient outcomes, and need.</p>","PeriodicalId":51137,"journal":{"name":"Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine","volume":"79 2","pages":"214-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/msj.21299","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.21299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Most solid-organ transplants performed in the Western world are from deceased donors. In the last decade, deceased donation rates have reached a plateau as the number of patients with end-stage organ disease has steadily increased, resulting in a large discrepancy between organ supply and demand. Living donor transplantation is one way to decrease this discrepancy. However, living donation is not universally accepted. For instance, living donation rates vary geographically (eg, living donation is more accepted in Asia than in the Western world) and depend on the organ donated (eg, kidney versus liver donation). In this article we will review the ethical principles guiding living donor liver transplantation, with emphasis on justification and safeguards that support the practice of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, the most clinically and ethically challenging type of living organ donation. Our ethical justification will include a presentation of triangular or tripartite equipoise, a framework that aims to balance donor safety, expected recipient outcomes, and need.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肝移植:伦理考虑。
西方世界进行的大多数实体器官移植都来自已故捐赠者。在过去的十年里,随着终末期器官疾病患者数量的稳步增加,死者捐献率达到了一个平台,导致器官供需之间的巨大差异。活体供体移植是减少这种差异的一种方法。然而,活体捐赠并没有被普遍接受。例如,活体捐赠率在地理上存在差异(例如,活体捐赠在亚洲比在西方世界更被接受),并取决于捐赠的器官(例如,肾脏还是肝脏捐赠)。在本文中,我们将回顾指导活体肝移植的伦理原则,重点是支持成人对成人活体肝移植实践的理由和保障措施,这是临床上和伦理上最具挑战性的活体器官捐赠类型。我们的道德辩护将包括三角或三方平衡,这是一个旨在平衡捐赠者安全、预期接受者结果和需求的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine
Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Familial polycythemia. Herpes zoster. List of Pilgrims and Travellers Image Credits Epilogue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1