Early experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a local single hospital experience.

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2012-05-01 Epub Date: 2012-04-26 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2012.82.5.302
Kyung Yun Kim, Seung Jae Byun, Kyeong Ho Yun, Sam Youn Lee, Dae Woong Ryu, Sang Jae Rhee, Byung Jun So
{"title":"Early experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a local single hospital experience.","authors":"Kyung Yun Kim,&nbsp;Seung Jae Byun,&nbsp;Kyeong Ho Yun,&nbsp;Sam Youn Lee,&nbsp;Dae Woong Ryu,&nbsp;Sang Jae Rhee,&nbsp;Byung Jun So","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2012.82.5.302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the short- to mid-term results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Wonkwang University School of Medicine & Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February 2009 and May 2011, 8 consecutive patients had undergone endovascular stent-grafting for thoracic aortic diseases. Five patients were treated for traumatic thoracic aortic injuries, two patients were treated for thoracic aneurysms and one patient was treated for a pseudoaneurysm due to penetrating aortic ulcers. Attempted stent-graft deployment was performed electively in 6 patients and emergently in 2. Follow-up was performed at 1-month, 6-month, 1-year, and annually thereafter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success rates were achieved in 87.5% and the 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Mean hospital length of stay after TEVAR was 30 days in traumatic thoracic aortic injuries and 10 days in thoracic aneurismal diseases. Intra-operative Type I endoleak due to migration at deflation was visualized in 1 patient, which was treated by insertion of another stent-graft. During follow-up, a major complication was encountered in one patient who received carotid-subclavian bypass to relieve left arm ischemia. After 5 months he was treated with arch replacement for aortic arch aneurysm with type I endoleak at proximal site after endovascular treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. However, 1 case of mortality (12.5%) was observed during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The short and mid-term results of endovascular repair of thoracic aortic diseases are promising. TEVAR is an effective procedure in the management of thoracic aortic diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":49157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"82 5","pages":"302-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.5.302","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2012.82.5.302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the short- to mid-term results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Wonkwang University School of Medicine & Hospital.

Methods: Between February 2009 and May 2011, 8 consecutive patients had undergone endovascular stent-grafting for thoracic aortic diseases. Five patients were treated for traumatic thoracic aortic injuries, two patients were treated for thoracic aneurysms and one patient was treated for a pseudoaneurysm due to penetrating aortic ulcers. Attempted stent-graft deployment was performed electively in 6 patients and emergently in 2. Follow-up was performed at 1-month, 6-month, 1-year, and annually thereafter.

Results: Technical success rates were achieved in 87.5% and the 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Mean hospital length of stay after TEVAR was 30 days in traumatic thoracic aortic injuries and 10 days in thoracic aneurismal diseases. Intra-operative Type I endoleak due to migration at deflation was visualized in 1 patient, which was treated by insertion of another stent-graft. During follow-up, a major complication was encountered in one patient who received carotid-subclavian bypass to relieve left arm ischemia. After 5 months he was treated with arch replacement for aortic arch aneurysm with type I endoleak at proximal site after endovascular treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. However, 1 case of mortality (12.5%) was observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: The short and mid-term results of endovascular repair of thoracic aortic diseases are promising. TEVAR is an effective procedure in the management of thoracic aortic diseases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸椎血管内主动脉修复术的早期经验:一项局部单一医院的经验。
目的:本回顾性研究的目的是评价圆光大学医学院胸椎血管内主动脉修复术(TEVAR)的中短期效果。方法:2009年2月至2011年5月,对8例胸主动脉病变患者行血管内支架植入术。5例为外伤性胸主动脉损伤,2例为胸动脉瘤,1例为穿透性主动脉溃疡引起的假性动脉瘤。6例患者选择性地进行了支架置换术,2例患者进行了紧急置换术。随访时间分别为1个月、6个月、1年和每年。结果:技术成功率为87.5%,30天死亡率为0%。外伤性胸主动脉损伤术后平均住院时间为30天,胸动脉瘤疾病术后平均住院时间为10天。1例患者术中出现因通货紧缩移位引起的I型内漏,并通过植入另一支架进行治疗。随访期间,一名接受颈动脉-锁骨下搭桥以缓解左臂缺血的患者出现了严重并发症。5个月后,在血管内治疗后,对近端I型内漏的主动脉弓动脉瘤行足弓置换术。30天死亡率为0%。然而,随访期间有1例死亡(12.5%)。结论:胸主动脉病变血管内修复术中短期效果良好。TEVAR是治疗胸主动脉疾病的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary team approach in breast cancer: a nationwide survey in Korea. Impact of pretransplant rituximab induction on highly sensitized kidney recipients: comparison with non-rituximab group. Influence of gastrectomy for stomach cancer on type 2 diabetes mellitus for patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m(2). Influence of surgical manipulation and surgical modality on the molecular detection of circulating tumor cells from colorectal cancer. Ten year outcomes after bypass surgery in aortoiliac occlusive disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1