Reconstruction of scalp defects with the radial forearm free flap.

Larissa Sweeny, Brendan Eby, J Scott Magnuson, William R Carroll, Eben L Rosenthal
{"title":"Reconstruction of scalp defects with the radial forearm free flap.","authors":"Larissa Sweeny,&nbsp;Brendan Eby,&nbsp;J Scott Magnuson,&nbsp;William R Carroll,&nbsp;Eben L Rosenthal","doi":"10.1186/1758-3284-4-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced and recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp and forehead require aggressive surgical excision often resulting in complex defects requiring reconstruction. This study evaluates various microvascular free flap reconstructions in this patient population, including the rarely utilized radial forearm free flap.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients undergoing free flap surgeries (n = 47) of the scalp between 1997 and 2011 were included. Patients were divided primarily into two cohorts: a new primary lesion (n = 21) or recurrence (n = 26). Factors examined include patient demographics, indication for surgery, defect, type of flap used, complications (major and minor), and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients were primarily male (n = 34), with a mean age of 67 years (25-91). A total of 58 microvascular free flap reconstructions were performed (radial forearm free flap: n = 28, latissimus dorsi: n = 20, rectus abdominis: n = 9, scapula: n = 1). Following reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap, duration of hospitalization was shorter (P = 0.04) and complications rates were similar (P = 0.46). Donor site selection correlated with defect area (P < 0.001), but not with the extent of skull defect (P = 0.70). Larger defect areas correlated with higher complications rates (P = 0.03) and longer hospitalization (P = 0.003). Patients were more likely to require multiple reconstructions if referred for a recurrent lesions (P = 0.01) or received prior radiation therapy (P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced and recurrent malignancies of the scalp are aggressive and challenging to treat. The radial forearm free flap is an underutilized free flap in the reconstruction of complex scalp defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":49195,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1758-3284-4-21","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck Optical Diagnostics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-4-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Background: Advanced and recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the scalp and forehead require aggressive surgical excision often resulting in complex defects requiring reconstruction. This study evaluates various microvascular free flap reconstructions in this patient population, including the rarely utilized radial forearm free flap.

Patients and methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing free flap surgeries (n = 47) of the scalp between 1997 and 2011 were included. Patients were divided primarily into two cohorts: a new primary lesion (n = 21) or recurrence (n = 26). Factors examined include patient demographics, indication for surgery, defect, type of flap used, complications (major and minor), and outcomes.

Results: The patients were primarily male (n = 34), with a mean age of 67 years (25-91). A total of 58 microvascular free flap reconstructions were performed (radial forearm free flap: n = 28, latissimus dorsi: n = 20, rectus abdominis: n = 9, scapula: n = 1). Following reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap, duration of hospitalization was shorter (P = 0.04) and complications rates were similar (P = 0.46). Donor site selection correlated with defect area (P < 0.001), but not with the extent of skull defect (P = 0.70). Larger defect areas correlated with higher complications rates (P = 0.03) and longer hospitalization (P = 0.003). Patients were more likely to require multiple reconstructions if referred for a recurrent lesions (P = 0.01) or received prior radiation therapy (P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Advanced and recurrent malignancies of the scalp are aggressive and challenging to treat. The radial forearm free flap is an underutilized free flap in the reconstruction of complex scalp defects.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前臂桡侧游离皮瓣修复头皮缺损。
背景:头皮和前额的晚期和复发性皮肤鳞状细胞癌需要积极的手术切除,通常导致复杂的缺陷需要重建。本研究评估了该患者群体的各种微血管自由皮瓣重建,包括很少使用的前臂桡骨自由皮瓣。患者和方法:回顾性分析1997 - 2011年间接受头皮游离皮瓣手术的患者(n = 47)。患者主要分为两组:新发原发病变(n = 21)或复发(n = 26)。检查的因素包括患者人口统计学、手术指征、缺陷、皮瓣类型、并发症(主要和次要)和结果。结果:患者以男性为主(n = 34),平均年龄为67岁(25-91岁)。共行58例微血管游离皮瓣重建(前臂桡侧游离皮瓣28例,背阔肌20例,腹直肌9例,肩胛骨1例)。采用前臂桡侧游离皮瓣重建,住院时间短(P = 0.04),并发症发生率相似(P = 0.46)。供体部位选择与颅骨缺损面积相关(P < 0.001),与颅骨缺损程度无关(P = 0.70)。缺损面积越大,并发症发生率越高(P = 0.03),住院时间越长(P = 0.003)。如果患者有复发性病变(P = 0.01)或接受过放射治疗(P = 0.02),则更有可能需要多次重建。结论:晚期和复发性头皮恶性肿瘤具有侵袭性和治疗挑战性。前臂桡骨游离皮瓣是一种未被充分利用的修复头皮复杂缺损的游离皮瓣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Pattern of Cervical Nodal Metastasis of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Squamous at the Time of Diagnosis in Patients Attending Tikur Anbessa Hospital from September 2015 to September 2020 An Inclusion Epidermoid Cyst, a Rare Complication of Versatile Naso-Labial Flap Immune cell infiltration patterns and survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Intercondylar distance before and after mandible resection Effect of human beta-defensin-3 on head and neck cancer cell migration using micro-fabricated cell islands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1