[Psychiatry in multiplicity].

Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Joost Vijselaar, Ruud Abma
{"title":"[Psychiatry in multiplicity].","authors":"Joost Vijselaar,&nbsp;Ruud Abma","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to a widespread interpretation, the history of psychiatry is characterized by a strong opposition between biological and psychological paradigms, which would dominate consecutive periods in history. The image of a swinging pendulum is a popular metaphor to describe this idea. The culture of Dutch psychiatry in the interwar years (1918-1940) seems to gainsay this image. Psychological, biological and socials models of explanation and therapy were used alongside each other without apparent debate and conflict. Influential professors of psychiatry like H.C. Rümke (Utrecht University) even pleaded for a conscious integration of these approaches. Some historians have interpreted this stance as a sign of scientific 'vagueness' and 'anarchy'. Analyzing the work of three major representatives of Dutch psychiatry in the Interbellum (Leendert Bouman, Han Rümke and Lammert van der Horst), the authors (former students of the master Historical and Comparative Studies of the Sciences and the Humanities) shed light on the psychiatric climate of this era, dealing with themes like the openness of psychiatry to other sciences, the interactions of psychiatry and literature, and the relationship between theory and clinical practice. As a result a further qualification of the image of the pendulum is argued for.</p>","PeriodicalId":89624,"journal":{"name":"Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"3 3","pages":"79-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to a widespread interpretation, the history of psychiatry is characterized by a strong opposition between biological and psychological paradigms, which would dominate consecutive periods in history. The image of a swinging pendulum is a popular metaphor to describe this idea. The culture of Dutch psychiatry in the interwar years (1918-1940) seems to gainsay this image. Psychological, biological and socials models of explanation and therapy were used alongside each other without apparent debate and conflict. Influential professors of psychiatry like H.C. Rümke (Utrecht University) even pleaded for a conscious integration of these approaches. Some historians have interpreted this stance as a sign of scientific 'vagueness' and 'anarchy'. Analyzing the work of three major representatives of Dutch psychiatry in the Interbellum (Leendert Bouman, Han Rümke and Lammert van der Horst), the authors (former students of the master Historical and Comparative Studies of the Sciences and the Humanities) shed light on the psychiatric climate of this era, dealing with themes like the openness of psychiatry to other sciences, the interactions of psychiatry and literature, and the relationship between theory and clinical practice. As a result a further qualification of the image of the pendulum is argued for.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[精神病学的多样性]。
根据一种普遍的解释,精神病学的历史以生物学范式和心理学范式之间的强烈对立为特征,这两种范式将在历史上连续的时期占据主导地位。一个摇摆的钟摆的形象是一个流行的比喻来描述这个想法。两次世界大战之间的荷兰精神病学文化(1918-1940)似乎否定了这种形象。心理学、生物学和社会学的解释和治疗模型相互配合使用,没有明显的争论和冲突。像乌得勒支大学(Utrecht University)的H.C. r mke等有影响力的精神病学教授甚至呼吁有意识地整合这些方法。一些历史学家将这种立场解释为科学“模糊”和“无政府状态”的标志。作者分析了战争期间荷兰精神病学的三位主要代表(Leendert Bouman, Han r mke和Lammert van der Horst)的工作,他们(科学与人文学科历史与比较研究硕士的前学生)揭示了这个时代精神病学的气候,处理了精神病学对其他科学的开放性,精神病学与文学的相互作用,以及理论与临床实践之间的关系等主题。因此,我们主张对摆像作进一步的限定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The Galenic content of Isaac Beeckman's medical ideas (1617-1629)]. ['The political world puzzle'. Ernst Haeckel and the German liberalism 1859-1900]. [From relativism to evaluation. Recent trends in the historiography of science and the humanities]. [Long-term history of science: on the flexibility and fragility of scientific disciplines]. [The 'national philologies' and the history of discipline formation in the humanities].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1