[The pendulum, the gap, and the clinic. Leendert Bouman (1869-1936) and the 'psychological turn' in Dutch psychiatry].

Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands) Pub Date : 2010-01-01
Timo Bolt
{"title":"[The pendulum, the gap, and the clinic. Leendert Bouman (1869-1936) and the 'psychological turn' in Dutch psychiatry].","authors":"Timo Bolt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent historical literature, the Dutch psychiatrist Leendert Bouman (1869-1936) is named 'the godfather of psychological psychiatry'. He is regarded as one of the exponents of a shift or 'pendulum' movement from a biological-materialistic to a psychological, phenomenological orientation in the Dutch psychiatry of the Interbellum. As a professor of the orthodox calvinist Vrije Universiteit of Amsterdam, he explicitly opposed a 'soul-less', biological-reductionist psychiatry. In addition, he played an important part in the introduction and spread of new'psychological' theories and especially Karl Jaspers' phenomenology in The Netherlands. It is one-sided and misleading, however, to refer to Bouman as a 'psychological' psychiatrist. Most of his scientific work was of a neurological and biological nature. He did not see biological (or nomothetic) and psychological (or idiographic) approaches as mutually exclusive, but as necessarily complementary. In this he followed Jaspers' distinction between and complementary use of the causal connections of psychic life (explanatory psychology) and meaningful psychic connections (psychology of meaning). Boumans pluralist orientation was rooted in his fundamentally clinical attitude toward psychiatry. In his view, a psychiatrist was in the first place a clinician. In the clinic, he stressed, a psychiatrist has to view and examine each individual patient in his bio-psycho-social totality. The case of Bouman illustrates that the history of psychiatry is by far richer and more complicated than is suggested by the standard account of that history being characterized by a pendulum movement and a one-dimensional struggle between 'somatic' and 'psychological' schools. It also suggests that the interaction between theory and clinical practice should be emphasized as an important dynamic factor in the history of psychiatry--next to or even above the dichotomy between 'biology' and 'psychology'.</p>","PeriodicalId":89624,"journal":{"name":"Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"3 3","pages":"82-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studium (Rotterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent historical literature, the Dutch psychiatrist Leendert Bouman (1869-1936) is named 'the godfather of psychological psychiatry'. He is regarded as one of the exponents of a shift or 'pendulum' movement from a biological-materialistic to a psychological, phenomenological orientation in the Dutch psychiatry of the Interbellum. As a professor of the orthodox calvinist Vrije Universiteit of Amsterdam, he explicitly opposed a 'soul-less', biological-reductionist psychiatry. In addition, he played an important part in the introduction and spread of new'psychological' theories and especially Karl Jaspers' phenomenology in The Netherlands. It is one-sided and misleading, however, to refer to Bouman as a 'psychological' psychiatrist. Most of his scientific work was of a neurological and biological nature. He did not see biological (or nomothetic) and psychological (or idiographic) approaches as mutually exclusive, but as necessarily complementary. In this he followed Jaspers' distinction between and complementary use of the causal connections of psychic life (explanatory psychology) and meaningful psychic connections (psychology of meaning). Boumans pluralist orientation was rooted in his fundamentally clinical attitude toward psychiatry. In his view, a psychiatrist was in the first place a clinician. In the clinic, he stressed, a psychiatrist has to view and examine each individual patient in his bio-psycho-social totality. The case of Bouman illustrates that the history of psychiatry is by far richer and more complicated than is suggested by the standard account of that history being characterized by a pendulum movement and a one-dimensional struggle between 'somatic' and 'psychological' schools. It also suggests that the interaction between theory and clinical practice should be emphasized as an important dynamic factor in the history of psychiatry--next to or even above the dichotomy between 'biology' and 'psychology'.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[钟摆,缝隙,诊所。Leendert Bouman(1869-1936)和荷兰精神病学的“心理转向”。
在最近的历史文献中,荷兰精神病学家Leendert Bouman(1869-1936)被称为“心理精神病学教父”。他被认为是战争期间荷兰精神病学从生物唯物主义转向心理学、现象学取向的“钟摆”运动的代表人物之一。作为一名正统加尔文主义阿姆斯特丹自由大学的教授,他明确反对“无灵魂”的生物还原论精神病学。此外,他在引入和传播新的“心理学”理论,特别是在荷兰的卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯现象学方面发挥了重要作用。然而,将鲍曼称为“心理”精神病学家是片面和误导的。他的大部分科学工作都是神经学和生物学性质的。他不认为生物学(或本体)和心理学(或具体)的方法是相互排斥的,而是必然互补的。在这一点上,他遵循了雅斯贝尔斯对精神生活的因果联系(解释心理学)和有意义的精神联系(意义心理学)的区分和互补使用。鲍曼的多元主义取向植根于他对精神病学的基本临床态度。在他看来,精神科医生首先是临床医生。他强调,在诊所里,精神科医生必须从他的生物、心理和社会整体来观察和检查每一个病人。鲍曼的案例表明,精神病学的历史远比以钟摆运动和“躯体”学派与“心理”学派之间的一维斗争为特征的标准描述所暗示的要丰富和复杂得多。它还表明,理论和临床实践之间的相互作用应该被强调为精神病学历史上一个重要的动态因素——仅次于甚至高于“生物学”和“心理学”之间的二分法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The Galenic content of Isaac Beeckman's medical ideas (1617-1629)]. ['The political world puzzle'. Ernst Haeckel and the German liberalism 1859-1900]. [From relativism to evaluation. Recent trends in the historiography of science and the humanities]. [Long-term history of science: on the flexibility and fragility of scientific disciplines]. [The 'national philologies' and the history of discipline formation in the humanities].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1