Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Joseph G Desloge, Charlotte M Reed, Louis D Braida, Zachary D Perez, Lorraine A Delhorne
{"title":"Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.","authors":"Joseph G Desloge, Charlotte M Reed, Louis D Braida, Zachary D Perez, Lorraine A Delhorne","doi":"10.1177/1084713812445510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional simulation of sensorineural hearing impairment is an important research tool that can elucidate the nature of hearing impairments and suggest or eliminate compensatory signal-processing schemes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the capability of an audibility-based functional simulation of hearing loss to reproduce the auditory-filter characteristics of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. The hearing-loss simulation used either threshold-elevating noise alone or a combination of threshold-elevating noise and multiband expansion to reproduce the audibility-based characteristics of the loss (including detection thresholds, dynamic range, and loudness recruitment). The hearing losses of 10 listeners with bilateral, mild-to-severe hearing loss were simulated in 10 corresponding groups of 3 age-matched normal-hearing listeners. Frequency selectivity was measured using a notched-noise masking paradigm at five probe frequencies in the range of 250 to 4000 Hz with a fixed probe level of either 70 dB SPL or 8 dB SL (whichever was greater) and probe duration of 200 ms. The hearing-loss simulation reproduced the absolute thresholds of individual hearing-impaired listeners with an average root-mean-squared (RMS) difference of 2.2 dB and the notched-noise masked thresholds with an RMS difference of 5.6 dB. A rounded-exponential model of the notched-noise data was used to estimate equivalent rectangular bandwidths and slopes of the auditory filters. For some subjects and probe frequencies, the simulations were accurate in reproducing the auditory-filter characteristics of the hearing-impaired listeners. In other cases, however, the simulations underestimated the magnitude of the auditory bandwidths for the hearing-impaired listeners, which suggests the possibility of suprathreshold deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48972,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Amplification","volume":"16 1","pages":"19-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4040846/pdf/10.1177_1084713812445510.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Amplification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713812445510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional simulation of sensorineural hearing impairment is an important research tool that can elucidate the nature of hearing impairments and suggest or eliminate compensatory signal-processing schemes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the capability of an audibility-based functional simulation of hearing loss to reproduce the auditory-filter characteristics of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. The hearing-loss simulation used either threshold-elevating noise alone or a combination of threshold-elevating noise and multiband expansion to reproduce the audibility-based characteristics of the loss (including detection thresholds, dynamic range, and loudness recruitment). The hearing losses of 10 listeners with bilateral, mild-to-severe hearing loss were simulated in 10 corresponding groups of 3 age-matched normal-hearing listeners. Frequency selectivity was measured using a notched-noise masking paradigm at five probe frequencies in the range of 250 to 4000 Hz with a fixed probe level of either 70 dB SPL or 8 dB SL (whichever was greater) and probe duration of 200 ms. The hearing-loss simulation reproduced the absolute thresholds of individual hearing-impaired listeners with an average root-mean-squared (RMS) difference of 2.2 dB and the notched-noise masked thresholds with an RMS difference of 5.6 dB. A rounded-exponential model of the notched-noise data was used to estimate equivalent rectangular bandwidths and slopes of the auditory filters. For some subjects and probe frequencies, the simulations were accurate in reproducing the auditory-filter characteristics of the hearing-impaired listeners. In other cases, however, the simulations underestimated the magnitude of the auditory bandwidths for the hearing-impaired listeners, which suggests the possibility of suprathreshold deficits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实和模拟听力障碍听者的听觉滤波器特性。
感音神经性听力损失的功能模拟是一种重要的研究工具,它可以阐明听力损失的本质,并提出或消除补偿信号处理方案。本研究旨在评估基于听力损失功能模拟的能力,以再现感音神经性听力损失听者的听觉滤波器特征。听力损失模拟单独使用阈值升高噪声或阈值升高噪声与多波段扩展相结合来再现听力损失的听觉特征(包括检测阈值、动态范围和响度招募)。在 10 组相应的 3 名年龄匹配的正常听力听者中,模拟了 10 名患有轻度至重度听力损失的听者的听力损失情况。在 250 至 4000 Hz 范围内的五个探头频率下,使用凹槽噪声掩蔽范式测量频率选择性,探头电平固定为 70 dB SPL 或 8 dB SL(以两者中较大者为准),探头持续时间为 200 ms。听力损失模拟再现了个别听力受损听者的绝对阈值,平均均方根(RMS)差值为 2.2 dB,缺口噪声掩蔽阈值的均方根差值为 5.6 dB。缺口噪声数据的圆角-指数模型用于估算听觉滤波器的等效矩形带宽和斜率。对于某些受试者和探测频率,模拟结果准确地再现了听障听众的听觉滤波器特性。但在其他情况下,模拟结果低估了听障听者的听觉带宽大小,这表明听障听者可能存在阈上缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trends in Amplification
Trends in Amplification AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids. Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS. The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation. The master hearing aid. How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1