Perceived levels of pain associated with bone marrow aspirates and biopsies.

The journal of supportive oncology Pub Date : 2012-07-01 Epub Date: 2012-05-22 DOI:10.1016/j.suponc.2012.04.002
Giampaolo Talamo, Jason Liao, Jamal Joudeh, Nicholas E Lamparella, Hoang Dinh, Jozef Malysz, W Christopher Ehmann
{"title":"Perceived levels of pain associated with bone marrow aspirates and biopsies.","authors":"Giampaolo Talamo,&nbsp;Jason Liao,&nbsp;Jamal Joudeh,&nbsp;Nicholas E Lamparella,&nbsp;Hoang Dinh,&nbsp;Jozef Malysz,&nbsp;W Christopher Ehmann","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about the degree of pain experienced by patients undergoing a bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of several strategies aimed at reducing the pain score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 258 consecutive adult patients who underwent BMAB via 6 different approaches, the first 5 of which were performed by one physician. Group A received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (5 mL) and a 5-minute wait time before the procedure; group B received local anesthesia with a double dose (10 mL) of lidocaine; group C received 5 mL of local anesthesia with a 10-minute wait; group D received 5 mL of local anesthesia plus a topical spray with ethyl chloride; group E received oral analgesia and anxiolysis 30 minutes before the procedure in addition to the group A dosage of lidocaine; and group F received the same anesthesia as did group A, but the BMAD was performed by a less experienced practitioner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On a 0 to 10 scale, the mean pain level among the 258 patients was 3.2 (standard deviation = 2.6). Rate of complications was low (<1%). Several strategies failed to improve the pain level, including the administration of a double dose of local anesthesia, waiting longer for the anesthesia effect, and the additional use of a topical anesthetic spray or oral analgesia and anxiolysis. Pain levels were not increased when the procedure was done by a less experienced practitioner. Younger age and female gender were associated with higher pain levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given that the average level of perceived pain during BMAB is low to moderate (approximately 3 on a 0-10 scale), the routine use of conscious sedation for this procedure may not be indicated. Several strategies aimed at reducing the pain level, including doubling the dose of anesthesia and using an oral prophylactic regimen of analgesia and anxiolysis, failed to improve pain scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"10 4","pages":"166-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.04.002","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the degree of pain experienced by patients undergoing a bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB).

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of several strategies aimed at reducing the pain score.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 258 consecutive adult patients who underwent BMAB via 6 different approaches, the first 5 of which were performed by one physician. Group A received local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (5 mL) and a 5-minute wait time before the procedure; group B received local anesthesia with a double dose (10 mL) of lidocaine; group C received 5 mL of local anesthesia with a 10-minute wait; group D received 5 mL of local anesthesia plus a topical spray with ethyl chloride; group E received oral analgesia and anxiolysis 30 minutes before the procedure in addition to the group A dosage of lidocaine; and group F received the same anesthesia as did group A, but the BMAD was performed by a less experienced practitioner.

Results: On a 0 to 10 scale, the mean pain level among the 258 patients was 3.2 (standard deviation = 2.6). Rate of complications was low (<1%). Several strategies failed to improve the pain level, including the administration of a double dose of local anesthesia, waiting longer for the anesthesia effect, and the additional use of a topical anesthetic spray or oral analgesia and anxiolysis. Pain levels were not increased when the procedure was done by a less experienced practitioner. Younger age and female gender were associated with higher pain levels.

Conclusions: Given that the average level of perceived pain during BMAB is low to moderate (approximately 3 on a 0-10 scale), the routine use of conscious sedation for this procedure may not be indicated. Several strategies aimed at reducing the pain level, including doubling the dose of anesthesia and using an oral prophylactic regimen of analgesia and anxiolysis, failed to improve pain scores.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与骨髓抽吸和活检相关的疼痛感知水平。
背景:对于骨髓穿刺活检(BMAB)患者所经历的疼痛程度知之甚少。目的:评价降低疼痛评分的几种策略的有效性。方法:我们对258例连续通过6种不同途径接受BMAB治疗的成年患者进行了回顾性分析,其中前5种途径由一名医生实施。A组患者行1%盐酸利多卡因(5ml)局麻,手术前等待5分钟;B组局部麻醉给予双剂量(10 mL)利多卡因;C组局部麻醉5ml,等待10分钟;D组给予5 mL局麻加氯乙酯局部喷雾剂;E组患者术前30 min在给予A组剂量利多卡因的基础上口服镇痛解焦虑;F组接受与A组相同的麻醉,但BMAD是由经验不足的医生进行的。结果:在0 ~ 10分制中,258例患者的平均疼痛程度为3.2(标准差为2.6)。并发症发生率低(结论:考虑到BMAB过程中感知疼痛的平均水平为低至中等(在0-10量表中约为3),可能不适合常规使用有意识镇静。一些旨在降低疼痛水平的策略,包括加倍麻醉剂量和使用口服预防性镇痛和抗焦虑方案,未能改善疼痛评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the quality of palliative care and supportive oncology: principles and practice. Illness perceptions matter: understanding quality of life and advanced illness behaviors in female patients with late-stage cancer. Monitoring of health-related quality of life and symptoms in prostate cancer survivors: a randomized trial. Characterization of skin reactions and pain reported by patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer at different sites. Whole brain radiotherapy for poor prognosis patients with brain metastases: predictably poor results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1