Survival of ceramic veneers made of different materials after a minimum follow-up period of five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Haralampos P Petridis, Alkisti Zekeridou, Maria Malliari, Dimitrios Tortopidis, Petros Koidis
{"title":"Survival of ceramic veneers made of different materials after a minimum follow-up period of five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Haralampos P Petridis,&nbsp;Alkisti Zekeridou,&nbsp;Maria Malliari,&nbsp;Dimitrios Tortopidis,&nbsp;Petros Koidis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the survival and complication rates of ceramic veneers produced with different techniques and materials after a minimum follow-up time of 5 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted, using electronic databases, relevant references, citations and journal researching, for clinical studies reporting on the survival of ceramic veneers fabricated with different techniques and materials with a mean followup time of at least 5 years. The search period spanned from January 1980 up to October 2010. Event rates were calculated for the following complications associated with ceramic veneers: fracture, debonding, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity, and caries. Summary estimates, and 5-year event rates were reported. Comparison between subgroups of different materials, as well as statistical significance, was calculated using a mixed effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were selected for final analysis over an initial yield of 409 titles. No study directly compared the incidence of complications between ceramic veneers fabricated from different materials. Four of the included studies reported on the survival of ceramic veneers made out of feldspathic ceramics; four studies were on glass-ceramic veneers and one study included veneers fabricated from both materials. The mean observation time ranged between 5 and 10 years. Overall, the 5-year complication rates were low, with the exception of studies reporting on extended ceramic veneers. The most frequent complication reported was marginal discoloration (9% at 5 years), followed by marginal integrity (3.9-7.7% at 5 years). There was no statistically significant difference in the event rates between the subgroups of different materials (feldspathic vs. glass-ceramic).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this systematic review showed that ceramic veneers fabricated from feldspathic or glass-ceramics have an adequate clinical survival for at least 5 years of clinical service, with very low complication rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":88322,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","volume":"7 2","pages":"138-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the survival and complication rates of ceramic veneers produced with different techniques and materials after a minimum follow-up time of 5 years.

Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted, using electronic databases, relevant references, citations and journal researching, for clinical studies reporting on the survival of ceramic veneers fabricated with different techniques and materials with a mean followup time of at least 5 years. The search period spanned from January 1980 up to October 2010. Event rates were calculated for the following complications associated with ceramic veneers: fracture, debonding, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity, and caries. Summary estimates, and 5-year event rates were reported. Comparison between subgroups of different materials, as well as statistical significance, was calculated using a mixed effects model.

Results: Nine studies were selected for final analysis over an initial yield of 409 titles. No study directly compared the incidence of complications between ceramic veneers fabricated from different materials. Four of the included studies reported on the survival of ceramic veneers made out of feldspathic ceramics; four studies were on glass-ceramic veneers and one study included veneers fabricated from both materials. The mean observation time ranged between 5 and 10 years. Overall, the 5-year complication rates were low, with the exception of studies reporting on extended ceramic veneers. The most frequent complication reported was marginal discoloration (9% at 5 years), followed by marginal integrity (3.9-7.7% at 5 years). There was no statistically significant difference in the event rates between the subgroups of different materials (feldspathic vs. glass-ceramic).

Conclusion: The results of this systematic review showed that ceramic veneers fabricated from feldspathic or glass-ceramics have an adequate clinical survival for at least 5 years of clinical service, with very low complication rates.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同材料的陶瓷贴面在至少5年的随访期后的存活率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统回顾的目的是比较不同技术和材料制作的陶瓷贴面在至少5年的随访时间后的存活率和并发症发生率。材料与方法:通过查阅电子数据库、相关参考文献、引文和期刊研究,检索不同技术和材料制备陶瓷贴面的临床研究报告,平均随访时间至少为5年。搜索期从1980年1月到2010年10月。计算了与陶瓷贴面相关的以下并发症的发生率:骨折、脱粘、边缘变色、边缘完整性和龋齿。报告了总结估计和5年事件发生率。采用混合效应模型计算不同材料亚组间比较及统计学显著性。结果:在409篇论文的初始产量中,选择了9篇研究进行最终分析。没有研究直接比较不同材料的陶瓷贴面并发症的发生率。其中四项研究报告了由长石陶瓷制成的陶瓷贴面的存活率;四项研究是关于玻璃陶瓷贴面的,一项研究包括两种材料制成的贴面。平均观测时间为5 ~ 10年。总的来说,5年的并发症发生率很低,除了扩展陶瓷贴面的研究报告。最常见的并发症是边缘变色(5年9%),其次是边缘完整(5年3.9-7.7%)。不同材料亚组(长石与玻璃陶瓷)的事件发生率无统计学差异。结论:本系统综述的结果表明,由长石或玻璃陶瓷制成的陶瓷贴面具有足够的临床生存至少5年的临床服务,并发症发生率非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biologically oriented dentistry. Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): a new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontically healthy teeth. Modified two-stage procedures for the treatment of gingival recession. Esthetic direct restorations in endodontically treated anterior teeth. Modern treatment planning approach facing a failure of conventional treatment. Part II: case report and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1