[Effectiveness of continuous passive motion after total knee replacement].

Tomasz Trzeciak, Magdalena Richter, Krzysztof Ruszkowski
{"title":"[Effectiveness of continuous passive motion after total knee replacement].","authors":"Tomasz Trzeciak,&nbsp;Magdalena Richter,&nbsp;Krzysztof Ruszkowski","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous passive motion (CPM) is frequently used method in the early post-operative rehabilitation in patients after knee surgery. Aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CPM after primary total knee arthroplasty. Efficacy was assesed in terms of clinical score and functional recovery. 93 patients (101 knee joints) undergoing total knee replacement were assigned into two groups. The experimental group received continuous passive motion and active exercises. A control group received conventional physical therapy only. CPM was initiated in the first day after surgery, for 120 minutes, starting with 0-40 degrees range of motion, increased as tolerated (mean 10 degrees per day) and maintained during the hospital stay. Outcome measures were those included in Knee Society Score (KSS). Functional recovery was evaluated using WOMAC. All subjects were evaluated once before the surgery and on 10th day postoperatively. Mean clinical score (KSS) at the day 10 was 70 +/- 15 points in the experimental group and 74 +/- 12 in a control group. There were no statistical difference between the two groups for any outcome measures. CPM group mean range of motion was 83 degrees +/- 14 degrees and a group without CPM 77 degrees +/- 21 degrees. KSS functional score was 66 +/- 9 points in the experimental group compared to 62 +/- 7 points in a control group. Subjective estimation of pain level, joint stiffness and function showed no statistical difference between the two groups regarding total and subscale scores. Mean total score was 24 +/- 19 points in the CPM group and 22 +/- 17 in a group without CPM. These findings show that CPM had no significant advantage in terms of improving clinical measurements. However, there was beneficial effect on subjective assessment of pain level, joint stiffness and functional ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":75702,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska","volume":"76 6","pages":"345-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia narzadow ruchu i ortopedia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuous passive motion (CPM) is frequently used method in the early post-operative rehabilitation in patients after knee surgery. Aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of CPM after primary total knee arthroplasty. Efficacy was assesed in terms of clinical score and functional recovery. 93 patients (101 knee joints) undergoing total knee replacement were assigned into two groups. The experimental group received continuous passive motion and active exercises. A control group received conventional physical therapy only. CPM was initiated in the first day after surgery, for 120 minutes, starting with 0-40 degrees range of motion, increased as tolerated (mean 10 degrees per day) and maintained during the hospital stay. Outcome measures were those included in Knee Society Score (KSS). Functional recovery was evaluated using WOMAC. All subjects were evaluated once before the surgery and on 10th day postoperatively. Mean clinical score (KSS) at the day 10 was 70 +/- 15 points in the experimental group and 74 +/- 12 in a control group. There were no statistical difference between the two groups for any outcome measures. CPM group mean range of motion was 83 degrees +/- 14 degrees and a group without CPM 77 degrees +/- 21 degrees. KSS functional score was 66 +/- 9 points in the experimental group compared to 62 +/- 7 points in a control group. Subjective estimation of pain level, joint stiffness and function showed no statistical difference between the two groups regarding total and subscale scores. Mean total score was 24 +/- 19 points in the CPM group and 22 +/- 17 in a group without CPM. These findings show that CPM had no significant advantage in terms of improving clinical measurements. However, there was beneficial effect on subjective assessment of pain level, joint stiffness and functional ability.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术后持续被动运动的有效性。
持续被动运动(CPM)是膝关节手术患者术后早期康复中常用的方法。本研究的目的是评估初次全膝关节置换术后CPM的有效性。根据临床评分和功能恢复来评估疗效。93例(101个膝关节)行全膝关节置换术分为两组。实验组连续进行被动运动和主动运动。对照组仅接受常规物理治疗。CPM在手术后第一天开始,持续120分钟,从0-40度的活动范围开始,随着患者的耐受性增加(平均每天10度),并在住院期间维持。结果测量包括膝关节社会评分(KSS)。使用WOMAC评估功能恢复情况。所有受试者术前和术后第10天评估1次。第10天的平均临床评分(KSS)实验组为70 +/- 15分,对照组为74 +/- 12分。两组之间的任何结果测量均无统计学差异。CPM组平均活动范围为83度+/- 14度,无CPM组平均活动范围为77度+/- 21度。实验组KSS功能评分为66 +/- 9分,对照组为62 +/- 7分。主观估计的疼痛程度、关节僵硬度和功能在两组的总评分和亚量表评分上没有统计学差异。CPM组平均总分为24 +/- 19分,无CPM组平均总分为22 +/- 17分。这些发现表明CPM在改善临床测量方面没有显著的优势。然而,对疼痛程度、关节僵硬度和功能能力的主观评估有有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Walking patterns of skeletally mature patients with scoliosis and myelomeningocele]. [Spontaneous patellar tendon rupture as a result of morbid obesity]. Surgical treatment outcome evaluation of hip joint acetabular fracture. Open reduction and internal stabilization of acetabular fractures in pregnancy--case report. [Animal model of humeral joint for shoulder arthroscopy training].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1