Effects of Medicare Part D coverage gap on medication and medical treatment among elderly beneficiaries with depression.

Yuting Zhang, Seo Hyon Baik, Lei Zhou, Charles F Reynolds, Judith R Lave
{"title":"Effects of Medicare Part D coverage gap on medication and medical treatment among elderly beneficiaries with depression.","authors":"Yuting Zhang,&nbsp;Seo Hyon Baik,&nbsp;Lei Zhou,&nbsp;Charles F Reynolds,&nbsp;Judith R Lave","doi":"10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy in late life prevents recurrent episodes of major depression. The coverage gap in Medicare Part D could increase the likelihood of reducing appropriate use of antidepressants, thereby exposing older adults to an increased risk for relapse of depressive episodes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether (1) beneficiaries reduce antidepressant use in the gap, (2) the reduction in antidepressant use is similar to the reduction in heart failure medications and antidiabetics, (3) the provision of generic coverage reduces the risk of reduction of medication use, and (4) medical spending increases in the gap.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational before-after study with a comparison group design.</p><p><strong>Setting and patients: </strong>A 5% random sample of US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with depression (n = 65,223) enrolled in stand-alone Part D plans in 2007.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Antidepressant pharmacotherapy, physician, outpatient, and inpatient spending.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Being in the gap was associated with comparable reductions in the use of antidepressants, heart failure medications, and antidiabetics. Relative to the comparison group (those who had full coverage in the gap because of Medicare coverage or low-income subsidies), the no-coverage group reduced their monthly antidepressant prescriptions by 12.1% (95% CI, 9.9%-14.3%) from the pregap level, whereas they reduced use of heart failure drugs and antidiabetics by 12.9% and 13.4%, respectively. Those with generic drug coverage in the gap reduced their monthly antidepressant prescriptions by 6.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-9.1%); this decrease was entirely attributable to the reduction in the use of brand-name antidepressants. Medicare spending on medical care did not increase for either group relative to the comparison group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Medicare Part D coverage gap was associated with modest reductions in the use of antidepressants. Those with generic coverage reduced their use of brand-name drugs and did not switch from brand-name to generic drugs. The reduction in antidepressant use was not associated with an increase in nondrug medical spending.</p>","PeriodicalId":8286,"journal":{"name":"Archives of general psychiatry","volume":"69 7","pages":"672-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1402","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of general psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Context: Maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy in late life prevents recurrent episodes of major depression. The coverage gap in Medicare Part D could increase the likelihood of reducing appropriate use of antidepressants, thereby exposing older adults to an increased risk for relapse of depressive episodes.

Objectives: To determine whether (1) beneficiaries reduce antidepressant use in the gap, (2) the reduction in antidepressant use is similar to the reduction in heart failure medications and antidiabetics, (3) the provision of generic coverage reduces the risk of reduction of medication use, and (4) medical spending increases in the gap.

Design: Observational before-after study with a comparison group design.

Setting and patients: A 5% random sample of US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with depression (n = 65,223) enrolled in stand-alone Part D plans in 2007.

Main outcome measures: Antidepressant pharmacotherapy, physician, outpatient, and inpatient spending.

Results: Being in the gap was associated with comparable reductions in the use of antidepressants, heart failure medications, and antidiabetics. Relative to the comparison group (those who had full coverage in the gap because of Medicare coverage or low-income subsidies), the no-coverage group reduced their monthly antidepressant prescriptions by 12.1% (95% CI, 9.9%-14.3%) from the pregap level, whereas they reduced use of heart failure drugs and antidiabetics by 12.9% and 13.4%, respectively. Those with generic drug coverage in the gap reduced their monthly antidepressant prescriptions by 6.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-9.1%); this decrease was entirely attributable to the reduction in the use of brand-name antidepressants. Medicare spending on medical care did not increase for either group relative to the comparison group.

Conclusions: The Medicare Part D coverage gap was associated with modest reductions in the use of antidepressants. Those with generic coverage reduced their use of brand-name drugs and did not switch from brand-name to generic drugs. The reduction in antidepressant use was not associated with an increase in nondrug medical spending.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保险D部分覆盖缺口对老年抑郁症受益人用药和医疗的影响。
背景:晚年维持抗抑郁药物治疗可预防重度抑郁症复发。医疗保险D部分的覆盖差距可能会增加减少适当使用抗抑郁药的可能性,从而使老年人抑郁发作复发的风险增加。目的:确定(1)受益人在空白期是否减少了抗抑郁药物的使用,(2)抗抑郁药物使用的减少与心力衰竭药物和抗糖尿病药物的减少相似,(3)提供通用保险降低了药物使用减少的风险,(4)医疗支出在空白期是否增加。设计:观察性前后对照研究,采用对照组设计。背景和患者:在2007年参加独立的D部分计划的65岁或65岁以上的美国医疗保险受益人中随机抽取5%的样本(n = 65223)。主要结局指标:抗抑郁药物治疗、医师、门诊和住院费用。结果:处于差距与抗抑郁药、心力衰竭药物和抗糖尿病药物的使用减少相关。相对于对照组(由于医疗保险覆盖或低收入补贴而在空白期获得全面覆盖的人),无覆盖组每月的抗抑郁药物处方比空白期前减少了12.1% (95% CI, 9.9%-14.3%),而心力衰竭药物和抗糖尿病药物的使用分别减少了12.9%和13.4%。在空白期有仿制药覆盖的患者每月抗抑郁药处方减少了6.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-9.1%);这种下降完全归因于品牌抗抑郁药使用的减少。与对照组相比,两组在医疗保健上的医疗保险支出都没有增加。结论:医疗保险D部分覆盖缺口与抗抑郁药使用的适度减少有关。那些有仿制药覆盖的人减少了对品牌药的使用,并且没有从品牌药转向仿制药。抗抑郁药使用的减少与非药物医疗支出的增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of general psychiatry
Archives of general psychiatry 医学-精神病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Excavation Improvement of brain reward abnormalities by antipsychotic monotherapy in schizophrenia. National trends in the office-based treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with antipsychotics. A system-level transcriptomic analysis of schizophrenia using postmortem brain tissue samples. Birth cohort effects on adolescent alcohol use: the influence of social norms from 1976 to 2007.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1