Application of a national administrative case definition for the identification of pre-existing diabetes mellitus in pregnancy.

V M Allen, L Dodds, A Spencer, E A Cummings, N MacDonald, G Kephart
{"title":"Application of a national administrative case definition for the identification of pre-existing diabetes mellitus in pregnancy.","authors":"V M Allen,&nbsp;L Dodds,&nbsp;A Spencer,&nbsp;E A Cummings,&nbsp;N MacDonald,&nbsp;G Kephart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Accurate ascertainment of pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes allows for the comprehensive surveillance of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with this chronic disease.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To determine the accuracy of case definitions for pre-existing diabetes mellitus when applied to a pregnant population, a cohort of women who were pregnant in Nova Scotia, Canada, between 1991 and 2003 was obtained from a population-based provincial perinatal database, the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database (NSAPD). Person-level data from administrative databases using hospital discharge abstract data and outpatient physician services data were linked to this cohort. Various algorithms for defining diabetes mellitus from the administrative data, including the algorithm suggested by the National Diabetes Surveillance System (NDSS), were compared to a reference standard definition from the NSAPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Validation of the NDSS case definition applied to this pregnant population demonstrated a sensitivity of 87% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 66.4%. Use of ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic codes among hospitalizations with diabetes mellitus in pregnancy showed important increases in sensitivity and PPV, especially for those pregnancies delivered in tertiary centres. In this population, pregnancy-related administrative data from the hospitalization database alone appear to be a more accurate data source for identifying pre-existing diabetes than applying the NDSS case definition, particularly when pregnant women are delivered in a tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the NDSS definition of diabetes performs reasonably well compared to a reference standard definition of diabetes, using this definition for evaluating maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with diabetes in pregnancy will result in a certain degree of misclassification and, therefore, biased estimates of outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49222,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","volume":"32 3","pages":"113-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate ascertainment of pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes allows for the comprehensive surveillance of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with this chronic disease.

Method: To determine the accuracy of case definitions for pre-existing diabetes mellitus when applied to a pregnant population, a cohort of women who were pregnant in Nova Scotia, Canada, between 1991 and 2003 was obtained from a population-based provincial perinatal database, the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database (NSAPD). Person-level data from administrative databases using hospital discharge abstract data and outpatient physician services data were linked to this cohort. Various algorithms for defining diabetes mellitus from the administrative data, including the algorithm suggested by the National Diabetes Surveillance System (NDSS), were compared to a reference standard definition from the NSAPD.

Results: Validation of the NDSS case definition applied to this pregnant population demonstrated a sensitivity of 87% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 66.4%. Use of ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic codes among hospitalizations with diabetes mellitus in pregnancy showed important increases in sensitivity and PPV, especially for those pregnancies delivered in tertiary centres. In this population, pregnancy-related administrative data from the hospitalization database alone appear to be a more accurate data source for identifying pre-existing diabetes than applying the NDSS case definition, particularly when pregnant women are delivered in a tertiary hospital.

Conclusion: Although the NDSS definition of diabetes performs reasonably well compared to a reference standard definition of diabetes, using this definition for evaluating maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with diabetes in pregnancy will result in a certain degree of misclassification and, therefore, biased estimates of outcomes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用国家行政病例定义鉴别妊娠期已有糖尿病。
前言:准确确定孕妇既往患有糖尿病,可以全面监测与这种慢性疾病相关的孕产妇和新生儿结局。方法:为了确定既往糖尿病病例定义在妊娠人群中的准确性,研究人员从以人口为基础的省围产期数据库新斯科舍省阿特利围产期数据库(NSAPD)中获取了1991年至2003年间加拿大新斯科舍省的孕妇队列。使用医院出院摘要数据和门诊医生服务数据的管理数据库中的个人水平数据与该队列相关联。从管理数据中定义糖尿病的各种算法,包括国家糖尿病监测系统(NDSS)建议的算法,与NSAPD的参考标准定义进行比较。结果:应用于该孕妇人群的NDSS病例定义验证显示敏感性为87%,阳性预测值(PPV)为66.4%。在妊娠期糖尿病住院患者中使用ICD-9和ICD-10诊断代码表明敏感性和PPV显著增加,特别是在三级医疗中心分娩的孕妇。在这一人群中,与应用NDSS病例定义相比,仅从住院数据库获取与妊娠相关的行政数据似乎是识别已存在糖尿病的更准确的数据来源,特别是当孕妇在三级医院分娩时。结论:尽管与糖尿病的参考标准定义相比,NDSS对糖尿病的定义表现得相当好,但使用该定义来评估妊娠期与糖尿病相关的孕产妇和围产期结局会导致一定程度的错误分类,从而导致对结局的估计有偏倚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial. Bicycle injuries and injury prevention. Injuries and helmet use related to non-motorized wheeled activities among pediatric patients. Intentional injury hospitalizations in geographical areas with a high percentage of Aboriginal-identity residents, 2004/2005 to 2009/2010. Modelling preventive effectiveness to estimate the equity tipping point: at what coverage can individual preventive interventions reduce socioeconomic disparities in diabetes risk? Cancer risk factors and screening in the off-reserve First Nations, Métis and non-Aboriginal populations of Ontario.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1