Study on Presence of Borrelia persica in Soft Ticks in Western Iran.

Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases Pub Date : 2010-01-01 Epub Date: 2010-12-31
A Barmaki, J Rafinejad, H Vatandoost, Z Telmadarraiy, F Mohtarami, Sh Leghaei, Ma Oshaghi
{"title":"Study on Presence of Borrelia persica in Soft Ticks in Western Iran.","authors":"A Barmaki, J Rafinejad, H Vatandoost, Z Telmadarraiy, F Mohtarami, Sh Leghaei, Ma Oshaghi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A molecular survey was conducted to investigate the presence of pathogenic Borrelia persica species causing the tick borne relapsing fever (TBRF) in Takistan district Qazvin Province, western Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A number of 1021 soft ticks were collected from 31 villages including previously reported infected and none-infected TBRF cases and individually examined for the presence of B. persica DNA by conventional PCR targeting the 16S rRNA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1021 soft ticks of three species of Ornithodouros tholozani (120: 11.75%), O. lahorensis (461: 45.15%) and Argas persicus (440: 43.1%) were collected and tested against Borrelia infection. Soft ticks were more prevalent (67%) in infected areas than none infected areas. The rate O. tholozani in infected areas was much greater (29 times) than none infected areas. Ninety seven percent of soft ticks in none infected areas were of O. tholozani. Sixteen (16.7%) ticks of tested (n=95) O. tholozani were infected with B. persica. Three (1.3%) out of 205 soft ticks of O. lahorensis were positive for Borrelia sp., and no infection was observed in A. persicus. TaqI RFLP analysis and sequence analysis of the positive PCR products showed the presence of B. persica. The RFLP analysis showed that the positive ticks of O. lahorensis were infected with unknown Borrelia species.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that although there were no TBRF cases in Takisan, but still infected O. tholozani, the known vector of TBRF, presented in the region. Control measures needs to be fulfilled in Thakisan.</p>","PeriodicalId":14525,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases","volume":"4 2","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/12/ijad-4-19.PMC3385554.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A molecular survey was conducted to investigate the presence of pathogenic Borrelia persica species causing the tick borne relapsing fever (TBRF) in Takistan district Qazvin Province, western Iran.

Methods: A number of 1021 soft ticks were collected from 31 villages including previously reported infected and none-infected TBRF cases and individually examined for the presence of B. persica DNA by conventional PCR targeting the 16S rRNA.

Results: A total of 1021 soft ticks of three species of Ornithodouros tholozani (120: 11.75%), O. lahorensis (461: 45.15%) and Argas persicus (440: 43.1%) were collected and tested against Borrelia infection. Soft ticks were more prevalent (67%) in infected areas than none infected areas. The rate O. tholozani in infected areas was much greater (29 times) than none infected areas. Ninety seven percent of soft ticks in none infected areas were of O. tholozani. Sixteen (16.7%) ticks of tested (n=95) O. tholozani were infected with B. persica. Three (1.3%) out of 205 soft ticks of O. lahorensis were positive for Borrelia sp., and no infection was observed in A. persicus. TaqI RFLP analysis and sequence analysis of the positive PCR products showed the presence of B. persica. The RFLP analysis showed that the positive ticks of O. lahorensis were infected with unknown Borrelia species.

Conclusion: This study showed that although there were no TBRF cases in Takisan, but still infected O. tholozani, the known vector of TBRF, presented in the region. Control measures needs to be fulfilled in Thakisan.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于伊朗西部软蜱中 Borrelia persica 存在情况的研究。
背景:对伊朗西部加兹温省塔基斯坦地区引起蜱传复发热(TBRF)的致病性包柔氏菌进行了分子调查:为调查伊朗西部加兹温省塔基斯坦地区是否存在引起蜱传复发性热(TBRF)的致病性包柔氏包柔氏菌(Borrelia persica),进行了一项分子调查:方法:从 31 个村庄收集了 1021 只软蜱,其中包括之前报告的 TBRF 感染病例和非感染病例,并通过针对 16S rRNA 的传统 PCR 方法逐一检测了 B. persica DNA 的存在:结果:共收集了 1021 只软蜱,分别来自三种蜱虫:Ornithodouros tholozani(120 只,占 11.75%)、O. lahorensis(461 只,占 45.15%)和 Argas persicus(440 只,占 43.1%)。软蜱在受感染地区的流行率(67%)高于非感染地区。感染区的 O. tholozani 感染率(29 倍)远高于非感染区。非感染区 97% 的软蜱为 O. tholozani。经检测(n=95)的 O. tholozani 中有 16 只(16.7%)蜱虫感染了 B. persica。在 205 只 O. lahorensis 软蜱中,有 3 只(1.3%)对鲍氏包虫病呈阳性反应,而在 A. persicus 中未观察到感染。对阳性 PCR 产物进行的 TaqI RFLP 分析和序列分析表明存在鲍氏不动杆菌。RFLP分析表明,O. lahorensis的阳性蜱感染了未知的包柔氏菌:这项研究表明,虽然泷山没有出现 TBRF 病例,但该地区仍存在已知的 TBRF 病媒 O. tholozani。需要在塔基桑采取控制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases
Iranian Journal of Arthropod-borne Diseases 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Susceptibility Status of Phlebotomus papatasi and P. sergenti (Diptera: Psychodidae) to DDT and Deltamethrin in a Focus of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis after Earthquake Strike in Bam, Iran. Utility of filter paper for preserving insects, bacteria, and host reservoir DNA for molecular testing. Larvicidal Activity of Essential Oils of Apiaceae Plants against Malaria Vector, Anopheles stephensi. Neospora caninum and Leishmania infantum Co-Infection in Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) in Meshkin-Shahr District, Northwestern Iran. Production and Purification of Anti-Rhombomys opimus Immunoglobulins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1