T3 subdivision correlation with nodal or distant metastasis in colorectal cancer; is it practically useful?

Abstract

See Article on Page 160-164 The pathological staging system has been regarded as a guideline for predicting the prognosis of patients and for deciding on the need for further adjuvant treatment. In this issue, the Yoo et al. [1] analyzed 555 colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery, especially for pT3 cancer subdivided according to the depth of tumor infiltration beyond the muscle proper layer: 15 mm. These 4 types of pT3 subdivisions were shown to be deeply correlated to the known prognostic histopathologic factors. One thing they did not analyze was the relation between T3 subdivision and the 5-year disease-free survival rate. They only compared pT3 subdivision with nodal and distant metastasis; furthermore, their multivariate analysis revealed that pT3 subtype might be an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Some studies regarding the relevant risk factors for regional lymph node metastasis in submucosal adenocarcinomas have been performed, and some of those measured not only the submucosal depth of invasion but also tumor budding, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, etc. In rectal cancer, the circumferential resection margin (CRM) and tumor deposit also have been reported as important risk factors for predicting patient prognosis, but none of those are recognized as definite prognostic factors in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. However, several reports have already demonstrated extramural invasion depth to be related with nodal metastasis and distant metastasis in colorectal cancer. Interestingly, pT3 subdivision has been analyzed and has been reported as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients not colon cancer patients. Miyoshi et al. [2] analyzed pT3 rectal cancer patients according to a 6-mm cutoff value for the extent of mesorectal invasion, and there were definite differences in the overall 5-year survival rates between the two groups of patients. Kim et al. [3] reported an interesting study regarding how to select high-risk rectal cancer patients based on preoperative local staging using rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). He compared the extent of mesorectal invasion between whole mounted rectal cancer histopathology and MRI using a 5-mm cutoff value to evaluate its value as a prognostic indicator. The overall accuracy of preoperative MRI was 88%, which means MRI can be used to select patient who show T3 with 5-mm infiltration beyond the muscle layer. Those patients could be candidates for preoperative chemoradiation. Unfortunately, T3 pathological subdivision is not accepted as a prognostic factor in the new AJCC tumor-node-metastasis staging system, Furthermore, cutoff points for the penetration depth of cancer invasion beyond the muscle proper layer have not been determined. Currently, most pathologists do not report T3 subdivision, and as far as I can determine, they seem in Korea to be reluctant to measure the distance of tumor infiltration beyond the muscle proper layer. If pT3 subdivision might be a clinically significant prognostic factor, two issues still remain to be solved. One is the lack of a consensus about cutoff points, which should be studied more based on a large patient cohort; the other involves the support and cooperation of pathologists. Based on personal experiences concerning pathological descriptions of the CRM, we have had long discussions and cooperative conferences with pathologists. Currently, CRM status documentation is mandatory in pathological reports submitted in Korea. I think this study showed us an important message about the heterogeneity of the prognoses for the pT3 group of patients. Conventionally, we have not paid attention to the prognoses of colorectal cancer patients in the same category of pT3 patients. Important feedback to the multidisciplinary team conference can allow patients with high risk of nodal and distant recurrence after curative surgery to be identified. Therefore, the strategy for treating patients with high risk may be changed based on preoperative modern imaging. Currently, some evidence exists that preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy may have oncological benefits compared surgery first [4, 5]. A couple of well-known high-risk factors are CRM status, tumor deposit, vascular encasement of nodes, etc., and patients with such factors should be candidates for preoperative treatment. Hopefully, pT3 subdivision may be a candidate for use as another high-risk factor, but it seems to have a long way to go.