Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates.

Betina T Blak, Mary Thompson, Hassy Dattani, Alison Bourke
{"title":"Generalisability of The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database: demographics, chronic disease prevalence and mortality rates.","authors":"Betina T Blak, Mary Thompson, Hassy Dattani, Alison Bourke","doi":"10.14236/jhi.v19i4.820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe degree of generalisability of patient databases to the general population is important for interpreting database research. This report describes the representativeness of The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a UK primary care database, of the UK population.\n\n\nMETHODS\nDemographics, deprivation (Townsend), Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) condition prevalence and deaths from THIN were compared with national statistical and QOF 2006/2007 data.\n\n\nRESULTS\nDemographics were similar although THIN contained fewer people aged under 25 years. Condition prevalence was comparable, e.g. 3.5% diabetes prevalence in THIN, 3.7% nationally. More THIN patients lived in the most affluent areas (23.5% in THIN, 20% nationally). Between 1990 and 2009, standardised mortality ratio ranged from 0.81 (95% CI: 0.39-1.49; 1990) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.48-1.64; 1995). Adjusting for demographics/deprivation, the 2006 THIN death rate was 9.08/1000 population close to the national death rate of 9.4/1000 population.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nTHIN is generalisable to the UK for demographics, major condition prevalence and death rates adjusted for demographics and deprivation.","PeriodicalId":30591,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Primary Care","volume":"19 4","pages":"251-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"626","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v19i4.820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 626

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The degree of generalisability of patient databases to the general population is important for interpreting database research. This report describes the representativeness of The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a UK primary care database, of the UK population. METHODS Demographics, deprivation (Townsend), Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) condition prevalence and deaths from THIN were compared with national statistical and QOF 2006/2007 data. RESULTS Demographics were similar although THIN contained fewer people aged under 25 years. Condition prevalence was comparable, e.g. 3.5% diabetes prevalence in THIN, 3.7% nationally. More THIN patients lived in the most affluent areas (23.5% in THIN, 20% nationally). Between 1990 and 2009, standardised mortality ratio ranged from 0.81 (95% CI: 0.39-1.49; 1990) to 0.93 (95% CI: 0.48-1.64; 1995). Adjusting for demographics/deprivation, the 2006 THIN death rate was 9.08/1000 population close to the national death rate of 9.4/1000 population. CONCLUSION THIN is generalisable to the UK for demographics, major condition prevalence and death rates adjusted for demographics and deprivation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康改善网络(THIN)数据库的通用性:人口统计学、慢性病患病率和死亡率。
患者数据库对一般人群的通用性程度对于解释数据库研究非常重要。本报告描述了健康改善网络(THIN),一个英国初级保健数据库,对英国人口的代表性。方法:将人口统计学、剥夺(Townsend)、质量和结局框架(QOF)状况患病率和THIN死亡与国家统计数据和2006/2007年QOF数据进行比较。结果:人口统计学相似,尽管THIN包含较少的25岁以下人群。疾病患病率具有可比性,例如,糖尿病患病率在THIN为3.5%,全国为3.7%。更多的THIN患者生活在最富裕的地区(THIN地区占23.5%,全国占20%)。1990年至2009年间,标准化死亡率为0.81 (95% CI: 0.39-1.49;1990)至0.93 (95% CI: 0.48-1.64;1995)。经人口统计/贫困因素调整后,2006年THIN死亡率为9.08/1000人,接近全国死亡率9.4/1000人。结论:THIN在人口统计学、主要疾病患病率和根据人口统计学和贫困调整的死亡率方面可推广到英国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring an informed decision-making framework using in-home sensors: older adults' perceptions. Undertaking sociotechnical evaluations of health information technologies. Privacy protection for personal health information and shared care records. Coding errors in an analysis of the impact of pay-for-performance on the care for long-term cardiovascular disease: a case study. Effective pseudonymisation and explicit statements of public interest to ensure the benefits of sharing health data for research, quality improvement and health service management outweigh the risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1