Rinsing with alcohol-free or alcohol-based chlorhexidine solutions after periodontal surgery. A double-blind, randomized, cross-over, pilot study.

Q Dentistry Swedish dental journal Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Helena Olsson, Barbro Asklöw, Eva Johansson, Christer Slotte
{"title":"Rinsing with alcohol-free or alcohol-based chlorhexidine solutions after periodontal surgery. A double-blind, randomized, cross-over, pilot study.","authors":"Helena Olsson,&nbsp;Barbro Asklöw,&nbsp;Eva Johansson,&nbsp;Christer Slotte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this randomized, double-blind, cross-over pilot study was to evaluate the effect on plaque formation and patient experience of rinsing after periodontal surgery using chlorhexidine solution with or without alcohol. Twenty patients refrained from tooth brushing after surgery and used two mouth rinses.Ten patients used alcohol-based (AB) 0.1% and another ten used alcohol-free (AF) 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX). Sutures were removed after 2 weeks and teeth were cleaned; thereafter, the two groups shifted solution. Plaque at operated teeth was recorded at 2 and 4 weeks (Quigley-Hein Index). Patient experience was assessed with a visual analogue scale (0-10). Mean (SD) plaque indices at 2 and 4 weeks were 1.0 (0.8) and 1.1 (1.0) for AB CHX and 1.1 (0.7) and 0.8 (0.7) for AF CHX, respectively (no significant differences between solutions). At 2 weeks, between-group differences in taste experience of the solutions differed non-significantly: 6.1 (2.8) for AB and 6.0 (2.3) for AF. At 4 weeks, values were 4.6 (2.5) for AB and 6.9 (3.3) for AF-patients tended to prefer AF (p = 0.050). Taste change over the study period was equal for both groups: -37 (3.3) for AB and 3.4 (2.3) for AF at 2 weeks and slightly higher at 4 weeks 4.9 (2.8) and 4.5 (2.5) for AB and AF, respectively. Smarting was low in both groups: 2.2 (3.2) and 1.3 (2.2) for AB and 1.0 (1.5) and 1.9 (2.0) for AF at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. To conclude, alcohol-free and alcohol-based chlorhexidine showed the same plaque inhibitory effect in periodontal patients after periodontal surgery. Both rinses were well tolerated by the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22114,"journal":{"name":"Swedish dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swedish dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this randomized, double-blind, cross-over pilot study was to evaluate the effect on plaque formation and patient experience of rinsing after periodontal surgery using chlorhexidine solution with or without alcohol. Twenty patients refrained from tooth brushing after surgery and used two mouth rinses.Ten patients used alcohol-based (AB) 0.1% and another ten used alcohol-free (AF) 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX). Sutures were removed after 2 weeks and teeth were cleaned; thereafter, the two groups shifted solution. Plaque at operated teeth was recorded at 2 and 4 weeks (Quigley-Hein Index). Patient experience was assessed with a visual analogue scale (0-10). Mean (SD) plaque indices at 2 and 4 weeks were 1.0 (0.8) and 1.1 (1.0) for AB CHX and 1.1 (0.7) and 0.8 (0.7) for AF CHX, respectively (no significant differences between solutions). At 2 weeks, between-group differences in taste experience of the solutions differed non-significantly: 6.1 (2.8) for AB and 6.0 (2.3) for AF. At 4 weeks, values were 4.6 (2.5) for AB and 6.9 (3.3) for AF-patients tended to prefer AF (p = 0.050). Taste change over the study period was equal for both groups: -37 (3.3) for AB and 3.4 (2.3) for AF at 2 weeks and slightly higher at 4 weeks 4.9 (2.8) and 4.5 (2.5) for AB and AF, respectively. Smarting was low in both groups: 2.2 (3.2) and 1.3 (2.2) for AB and 1.0 (1.5) and 1.9 (2.0) for AF at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively. To conclude, alcohol-free and alcohol-based chlorhexidine showed the same plaque inhibitory effect in periodontal patients after periodontal surgery. Both rinses were well tolerated by the patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙周手术后用不含酒精或含酒精的氯己定溶液冲洗。一项双盲,随机,交叉,试点研究。
这项随机、双盲、交叉试验研究的目的是评估对牙菌斑形成的影响以及患者在牙周手术后使用含或不含酒精的氯己定溶液冲洗的体验。20例患者术后不刷牙,使用两种漱口水。10例患者使用含酒精(AB) 0.1%,另外10例使用无酒精(AF) 0.12%的氯己定(CHX)。2周后拆除缝线,清洁牙齿;此后,两组转移溶液。术后第2周和第4周分别记录牙菌斑(Quigley-Hein指数)。用视觉模拟量表(0-10)评估患者体验。2周和4周时,AB CHX的平均(SD)斑块指数分别为1.0(0.8)和1.1 (1.0),AF CHX的平均(SD)斑块指数为1.1(0.7)和0.8(0.7)(两种溶液之间无显著差异)。2周时,两组之间的味觉体验差异无显著性差异:AB组为6.1 (2.8),AF组为6.0(2.3)。4周时,AB组为4.6 (2.5),AF组为6.9(3.3),患者倾向于选择AF (p = 0.050)。两组在研究期间的味觉变化相同:2周时AB组为-37 (3.3),AF组为3.4(2.3),4周时AB和AF组的味觉变化略高,分别为4.9(2.8)和4.5(2.5)。两组患者的疼痛程度均较低:在第2周和第4周时,AB患者的疼痛程度分别为2.2(3.2)和1.3 (2.2),AF患者的疼痛程度分别为1.0(1.5)和1.9(2.0)。综上所述,不含酒精和含酒精氯己定对牙周手术后牙周患者的菌斑抑制作用相同。患者对这两种洗液的耐受性都很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swedish dental journal
Swedish dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
0.85
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Swedish Dental Journal is the scientific journal of the Swedish Dental Association and the Swedish Dental Society. It is published 4 times a year to promote practice, education and research within odontology. Manuscripts containing original research are accepted for consideraion if neither the article nor any part of its essential substance has been or will be published elsewhere. Reviews, Case Reports and Short Communications will also be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Adverbs Verbs Punctuation Conjunctions Prepositions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1