A Multi-institutional Phase 2 Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Rebecca A Moss, Dirk Moore, Mary F Mulcahy, Kenneth Nahum, Biren Saraiya, Simantini Eddy, Martin Kleber, Elizabeth A Poplin
{"title":"A Multi-institutional Phase 2 Study of Imatinib Mesylate and Gemcitabine for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.","authors":"Rebecca A Moss,&nbsp;Dirk Moore,&nbsp;Mary F Mulcahy,&nbsp;Kenneth Nahum,&nbsp;Biren Saraiya,&nbsp;Simantini Eddy,&nbsp;Martin Kleber,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Poplin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pancreatic tumor microenvironment is rich in receptors for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFRs). Imatinib mesylate (IM) inhibits PDGFRs and decreases tumor interstitial fluid pressure, potentially improving drug access. These data and promising results in a phase 1 trial formed the rationale for a phase 2 trial combining IM and gemcitabine (GEM) in pancreatic cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer; ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤2; and adequate end-organ function. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rate, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). GEM was given at 1200 mg/m(2)/120 min on days 3 and 10. IM (400 mg) was taken orally on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 of a 21-day cycle. Response was assessed every 3 cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four patients from 7 centers were enrolled from October 2005 through July 2009. Median age was 62 years. The median number of cycles completed was 3 (range, 0-17). Common adverse effects included neutropenia, nausea, anemia, and fatigue. Half the patients required dose reductions. There were no complete responses to therapy. During treatment, 1 patient showed a partial response, 16 had stable disease, and 18 had progressive disease. The median PFS was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.1), the median OS was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-8.5), and the 1-year survival rate was 25.6% (95% confidence interval, 13.8-39.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IM in combination with GEM is tolerated in locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent pancreatic cancer, but does not show a statistically significant PFS or OS benefit over chemotherapy with GEM alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":12695,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415717/pdf/gcr77.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal cancer research : GCR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pancreatic tumor microenvironment is rich in receptors for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGFRs). Imatinib mesylate (IM) inhibits PDGFRs and decreases tumor interstitial fluid pressure, potentially improving drug access. These data and promising results in a phase 1 trial formed the rationale for a phase 2 trial combining IM and gemcitabine (GEM) in pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer; ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status ≤2; and adequate end-organ function. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rate, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). GEM was given at 1200 mg/m(2)/120 min on days 3 and 10. IM (400 mg) was taken orally on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 of a 21-day cycle. Response was assessed every 3 cycles.

Results: Forty-four patients from 7 centers were enrolled from October 2005 through July 2009. Median age was 62 years. The median number of cycles completed was 3 (range, 0-17). Common adverse effects included neutropenia, nausea, anemia, and fatigue. Half the patients required dose reductions. There were no complete responses to therapy. During treatment, 1 patient showed a partial response, 16 had stable disease, and 18 had progressive disease. The median PFS was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.1), the median OS was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval, 5.2-8.5), and the 1-year survival rate was 25.6% (95% confidence interval, 13.8-39.1).

Conclusion: IM in combination with GEM is tolerated in locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent pancreatic cancer, but does not show a statistically significant PFS or OS benefit over chemotherapy with GEM alone.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲磺酸伊马替尼和吉西他滨一线治疗晚期胰腺癌的多机构2期研究
背景:胰腺肿瘤微环境富含血小板衍生生长因子(PDGFRs)受体。甲磺酸伊马替尼(IM)抑制PDGFRs并降低肿瘤间质液压力,可能改善药物可及性。这些数据和1期临床试验中令人鼓舞的结果为联合IM和吉西他滨(GEM)治疗胰腺癌的2期临床试验提供了依据。方法:入选标准:chemotherapy-naïve,局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌;ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)绩效状态≤2;以及终末器官的功能。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括有效率、毒性和总生存期(OS)。在第3天和第10天,以1200mg /m(2)/ 120min的剂量给予GEM。IM (400mg)在21天周期的第1- 5天和第8 - 12天口服。每3个周期评估一次疗效。结果:从2005年10月到2009年7月,来自7个中心的44名患者入组。中位年龄为62岁。完成周期的中位数为3(范围,0-17)。常见的不良反应包括中性粒细胞减少、恶心、贫血和疲劳。一半的患者需要减少剂量。对治疗没有完全的反应。治疗期间1例部分缓解,16例病情稳定,18例病情进展。中位PFS为3.9个月(95%可信区间,2.1-5.1),中位OS为6.3个月(95%可信区间,5.2-8.5),1年生存率为25.6%(95%可信区间,13.8-39.1)。结论:IM联合GEM在局部晚期、转移性或复发性胰腺癌中是耐受的,但与单独使用GEM相比,没有统计学上显著的PFS或OS益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the liver to the foot: a case of systemic embolism and acrometastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Pseudomyxoma peritonei metastatic to the bone: case report and review of systemic management. Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Intra-atrial Extension Responding to Transarterial Chemoembolization via the Right Hepatic and Right Inferior Phrenic Arteries. Metastatic breast cancer masquerading as primary gastric cancer: case report and review of the literature. A case of primary colonic small-cell carcinoma arising in a patient with long-standing ulcerative colitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1