The validation of potency tests: hurdles identified by EMA/CVMP/IWP.

Developments in biologicals Pub Date : 2012-01-01
R Woodland
{"title":"The validation of potency tests: hurdles identified by EMA/CVMP/IWP.","authors":"R Woodland","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The biological nature of IVMPs leads to some unavoidable batch to batch variation in production. The potency test is part of the quality control of the finished product intended to confirm consistency of production and that each batch is formulated equivalent to batches that have been demonstrated to be efficacious. Adequate validation of potency tests is essential to ensure that the results of the assays accurately reflect the amount, titre, or potency of the active substance measured and to indicate the limitations on the accuracy of the measurements to be expected from the test used. The CVMP/IWP published their conclusions concerning validation of potency tests in a Reflection Paper in March 2010. The test validation must demonstrate a dose response and the precision of the result should enable reliable detection of a sub-standard batch. However, the inherent variability in experimental animals often leads to unacceptably wide confidence intervals for in vivo tests which limits their ability to detect slight changes of the antigen amount. The development of in vitro methods as alternatives to in vivo potency tests is encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":11190,"journal":{"name":"Developments in biologicals","volume":"134 ","pages":"69-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in biologicals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The biological nature of IVMPs leads to some unavoidable batch to batch variation in production. The potency test is part of the quality control of the finished product intended to confirm consistency of production and that each batch is formulated equivalent to batches that have been demonstrated to be efficacious. Adequate validation of potency tests is essential to ensure that the results of the assays accurately reflect the amount, titre, or potency of the active substance measured and to indicate the limitations on the accuracy of the measurements to be expected from the test used. The CVMP/IWP published their conclusions concerning validation of potency tests in a Reflection Paper in March 2010. The test validation must demonstrate a dose response and the precision of the result should enable reliable detection of a sub-standard batch. However, the inherent variability in experimental animals often leads to unacceptably wide confidence intervals for in vivo tests which limits their ability to detect slight changes of the antigen amount. The development of in vitro methods as alternatives to in vivo potency tests is encouraged.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效价试验的验证:EMA/CVMP/IWP确定的障碍。
IVMPs的生物学性质导致生产中不可避免的批次差异。效价测试是成品质量控制的一部分,旨在确认生产的一致性,并确保每批制剂与已证明有效的批次制剂相同。效价试验的充分验证至关重要,以确保测定结果准确反映所测活性物质的量、滴度或效价,并指出所使用的试验对预期测量准确性的限制。CVMP/IWP于2010年3月在一份反思文件中发表了他们关于效价测试验证的结论。试验验证必须证明剂量响应,结果的精度应能够可靠地检测出不合格批次。然而,实验动物固有的可变性往往导致体内试验的置信区间太宽,这限制了它们检测抗原数量微小变化的能力。鼓励发展体外方法作为体内效价试验的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
African swine fever diagnosis update. Classical swine fever. Schmallenberg virus. Q fever diagnosis and control in domestic ruminants. Opportunities in diagnostic and vaccine approaches to mitigate potential heartwater spreading and impact on the American mainland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1