Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in small, large, and giant rectal adenomas.

Andrea Scala, Gianpiero Gravante, Neville Dastur, Roberto Sorge, Jay N L Simson
{"title":"Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in small, large, and giant rectal adenomas.","authors":"Andrea Scala,&nbsp;Gianpiero Gravante,&nbsp;Neville Dastur,&nbsp;Roberto Sorge,&nbsp;Jay N L Simson","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE To assess the outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in small (&lt;3 cm), large (3-5 cm), and giant (&gt;5 cm) lesions and compare these with reports of alternative techniques. DESIGN Data from January 1998 to February 2010 were prospectively collected. Lesions were divided into 3 groups according to the maximum diameter (group A, &lt;3 cm; group B, 3-5 cm; and group C, &gt;5 cm) and outcomes were analyzed separately. SETTING Colorectal unit in a single-district general hospital. PATIENTS Patients diagnosed as having benign rectal adenomas. INTERVENTION Transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Completion of excision (R0), en bloc and full-thickness excisions, complication and local recurrence rates, and disease-free survival. RESULTS A total of 320 lesions were analyzed. Overall en bloc and full-thickness excision rates were 99% and 80.7%, respectively. In the 279 benign lesions, the R0 rate was 90.3%. Outcomes for groups A, B, and C were, respectively: 9.3%, 12.8%, and 14.4% incidence of unexpected malignancy (P = .64); 95.9%, 92.2%, and 85.1% R0 resection for benign lesions (P = .19); and 7.4%, 14.9%, and 24.6% complication rates (P &lt; .05). Overall operative mortality was 1 of 320 (0.3%). In group C, there was a higher estimated recurrence rate, therefore a lower disease-free survival than groups A and B; this difference was significant 40 months after surgery. Recurrences were associated with closeness to dentate line and advanced age (univariate analysis) and R1 resection (Cox regression). CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on large rectal lesions compared favorably with literature reports of alternative techniques. Postoperative complications and recurrences increased significantly with lesions larger than 5 cm.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1093-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1954","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in small (<3 cm), large (3-5 cm), and giant (>5 cm) lesions and compare these with reports of alternative techniques. DESIGN Data from January 1998 to February 2010 were prospectively collected. Lesions were divided into 3 groups according to the maximum diameter (group A, <3 cm; group B, 3-5 cm; and group C, >5 cm) and outcomes were analyzed separately. SETTING Colorectal unit in a single-district general hospital. PATIENTS Patients diagnosed as having benign rectal adenomas. INTERVENTION Transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Completion of excision (R0), en bloc and full-thickness excisions, complication and local recurrence rates, and disease-free survival. RESULTS A total of 320 lesions were analyzed. Overall en bloc and full-thickness excision rates were 99% and 80.7%, respectively. In the 279 benign lesions, the R0 rate was 90.3%. Outcomes for groups A, B, and C were, respectively: 9.3%, 12.8%, and 14.4% incidence of unexpected malignancy (P = .64); 95.9%, 92.2%, and 85.1% R0 resection for benign lesions (P = .19); and 7.4%, 14.9%, and 24.6% complication rates (P < .05). Overall operative mortality was 1 of 320 (0.3%). In group C, there was a higher estimated recurrence rate, therefore a lower disease-free survival than groups A and B; this difference was significant 40 months after surgery. Recurrences were associated with closeness to dentate line and advanced age (univariate analysis) and R1 resection (Cox regression). CONCLUSIONS Outcomes of transanal endoscopic microsurgery on large rectal lesions compared favorably with literature reports of alternative techniques. Postoperative complications and recurrences increased significantly with lesions larger than 5 cm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经肛门内窥镜显微手术治疗小、大、巨直肠腺瘤。
目的评估经肛门内镜显微手术治疗小(3cm)、大(3-5 cm)和巨大(5cm)病变的效果,并将其与其他技术的报道进行比较。前瞻性地收集1998年1月至2010年2月的数据。根据病变最大直径分为3组(A组,3cm;B组,3-5 cm;C组为>5 cm),结果分别进行分析。背景:单区综合医院结直肠科。患者诊断为直肠良性腺瘤的患者。介入:经肛门内镜显微手术切除。主要观察指标:切除完成(R0)、整体和全层切除、并发症和局部复发率、无病生存。结果共分析病灶320例。整体和全层切除率分别为99%和80.7%。279例良性病变中R0率为90.3%。A、B、C组的结果分别为:意外恶性肿瘤发生率9.3%、12.8%、14.4% (P = 0.64);良性病变的R0切除率分别为95.9%、92.2%和85.1% (P = 0.19);并发症发生率分别为7.4%、14.9%和24.6% (P <. 05)。总手术死亡率为1 / 320(0.3%)。在C组中,估计复发率较高,因此无病生存率低于a组和B组;这种差异在手术后40个月是显著的。复发与靠近齿状线、高龄(单因素分析)和R1切除(Cox回归)有关。结论:经肛门内窥镜显微手术治疗大直肠病变的效果优于文献报道的其他技术。病变大于5 cm时,术后并发症和复发率明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Surgery
Archives of Surgery 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Breast and Thyroid Cancer: Correlation Between two Pathologies and Management Challenges Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow Pseudohermaphroditism. Brothers. Preoperative biopsy evaluation of chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: looking for a needle in a haystack? Comment on "prospective evaluation of accuracy of liver biopsy findings in the identification of chemotherapy-associated liver injury".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1