Healthcare reform after the Supreme Court ruling: implications for nurse executives.

Rebecca F Cady
{"title":"Healthcare reform after the Supreme Court ruling: implications for nurse executives.","authors":"Rebecca F Cady","doi":"10.1097/NHL.0b013e31826a2bac","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On June 28, 2012, the US Supreme Court upheld the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Healthcare and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, with the exception that the Department of Health and Human Services may not withhold existing Medicaid funding from states that refuse to adopt the Medicaid expansion, but rather only new Medicaid funding associated with the expansion. This article will review the impact of this ruling on healthcare providers with a focus on the practice of the nurse executive.</p>","PeriodicalId":80291,"journal":{"name":"JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation","volume":"14 3","pages":"81-4; quiz 85-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/NHL.0b013e31826a2bac","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NHL.0b013e31826a2bac","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On June 28, 2012, the US Supreme Court upheld the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Healthcare and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, with the exception that the Department of Health and Human Services may not withhold existing Medicaid funding from states that refuse to adopt the Medicaid expansion, but rather only new Medicaid funding associated with the expansion. This article will review the impact of this ruling on healthcare providers with a focus on the practice of the nurse executive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最高法院裁决后的医疗改革:对护士主管的影响。
2012年6月28日,美国最高法院维持经2010年《医疗保健与教育和解法》修订的《2010年患者保护和平价医疗法案》的规定,但卫生与公众服务部不得向拒绝扩大医疗补助计划的州扣留现有的医疗补助资金,只能扣留与扩大医疗补助计划相关的新医疗补助资金。本文将回顾这一裁决对医疗保健提供者的影响,重点是护士行政人员的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Informed consent: essential legal and ethical principles for nurses. Attitudes of nurses toward patient-directed dying: a pilot study. Moral distress among healthcare professionals at a health system. Letter from the editor. Moral distress among health care professionals. Legal briefs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1