Student disruption in a global college classroom: multicultural issues as predisposing factors.

Geraldine Brown
{"title":"Student disruption in a global college classroom: multicultural issues as predisposing factors.","authors":"Geraldine Brown","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>University and college faculty members may face inappropriate student behavior in a global classroom. This situation can complicate the maintenance of a positive effective learning environment. Student disruption is seen as disturbing behavior that interferes with the faculty member's academic or administrative ability to conduct class, or the ability of other students to profit from the class instruction. Disruptive behavior may threaten or endanger the physical or psychological health, safety or welfare of others. Various types of disruptive behavior and disrespect that university or college faculty are likely to experience include: grandstanding (use the classroom for themselves by monopolizing class discussion with no regard to relevancy to the discussion); prolonged chattering (small cliques of students who engage in private conversations or passing notes to each other); noisy electric devices (cell phones ringing in class, or students talking or text messaging during class time); leaving and entering class (frequently in the absence of notice to professor of illness or other extenuating circumstances); and disputing the professor's authority or expertise (students may be disappointed or unhappy over a grade and may debunk or devalue the professor's judgment, authority and expertise). This action may be in the form of comments in the class or memos to department chair or dean. Persistent speaking without permission and verbal or physical threats to faculty members or other students are also disruptive mannerisms. Working with a diverse student population can present unique challenges. Multicultural issues related to race, ethnicity, gender, physical, emotional or socioeconomic status and sexual orientation might require increased sensitivity, knowledge and self-exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":74925,"journal":{"name":"The ABNF journal : official journal of the Association of Black Nursing Faculty in Higher Education, Inc","volume":"23 3","pages":"63-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ABNF journal : official journal of the Association of Black Nursing Faculty in Higher Education, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

University and college faculty members may face inappropriate student behavior in a global classroom. This situation can complicate the maintenance of a positive effective learning environment. Student disruption is seen as disturbing behavior that interferes with the faculty member's academic or administrative ability to conduct class, or the ability of other students to profit from the class instruction. Disruptive behavior may threaten or endanger the physical or psychological health, safety or welfare of others. Various types of disruptive behavior and disrespect that university or college faculty are likely to experience include: grandstanding (use the classroom for themselves by monopolizing class discussion with no regard to relevancy to the discussion); prolonged chattering (small cliques of students who engage in private conversations or passing notes to each other); noisy electric devices (cell phones ringing in class, or students talking or text messaging during class time); leaving and entering class (frequently in the absence of notice to professor of illness or other extenuating circumstances); and disputing the professor's authority or expertise (students may be disappointed or unhappy over a grade and may debunk or devalue the professor's judgment, authority and expertise). This action may be in the form of comments in the class or memos to department chair or dean. Persistent speaking without permission and verbal or physical threats to faculty members or other students are also disruptive mannerisms. Working with a diverse student population can present unique challenges. Multicultural issues related to race, ethnicity, gender, physical, emotional or socioeconomic status and sexual orientation might require increased sensitivity, knowledge and self-exploration.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球化大学课堂中的学生干扰:作为诱发因素的多元文化问题。
在全球课堂上,大学和学院的教职员工可能会面临学生的不当行为。这种情况会使积极有效的学习环境的维持复杂化。学生干扰被视为干扰教师的学术或管理能力,或其他学生从课堂教学中获益的令人不安的行为。破坏性行为可能威胁或危害他人的身体或心理健康、安全或福利。大学或学院教师可能经历的各种破坏性行为和不尊重包括:哗众哗众(通过垄断课堂讨论而不考虑讨论的相关性来利用课堂);闲聊时间过长(一小群学生私下交谈或互相传递纸条);嘈杂的电子设备(上课时手机响,学生在上课时说话或发短信);离开和进入课堂(经常在没有通知教授生病或其他情有可原的情况下);质疑教授的权威或专业知识(学生可能会对成绩感到失望或不满意,可能会揭穿或贬低教授的判断、权威和专业知识)。这种行为可以在课堂上发表评论,也可以是给系主任或院长的备忘录。未经允许持续讲话,对教职员工或其他学生进行口头或身体威胁,也是破坏性行为。与不同的学生群体合作可能会带来独特的挑战。与种族、民族、性别、身体、情感或社会经济地位和性取向有关的多元文化问题可能需要增加敏感性、知识和自我探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vaccines, Herd Immunity, and COVID-19. The First 100 Days Quality of Life Considerations During Cancer Treatment in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Patients: A Systemic Review. Greetings to ALL in the New Year. A Call About Concerns in 2017.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1