Cost-effectiveness of preventive oral health care in medical offices for young Medicaid enrollees.

Sally C Stearns, R Gary Rozier, Ashley M Kranz, Bhavna T Pahel, Rocio B Quiñonez
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of preventive oral health care in medical offices for young Medicaid enrollees.","authors":"Sally C Stearns, R Gary Rozier, Ashley M Kranz, Bhavna T Pahel, Rocio B Quiñonez","doi":"10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a medical office-based preventive oral health program in North Carolina called Into the Mouths of Babes (IMB).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study using Medicaid claims data (2000-2006).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medical staff delivered IMB services in medical offices, and dentists provided dental services in offices or hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 209 285 children enrolled in Medicaid at age 6 months.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Into the Mouths of Babes visits included screening, parental counseling, topical fluoride application, and referral to dentists, if needed. The cost-effectiveness analysis used the Medicaid program perspective and a propensity score-matched sample with regression analysis to compare children with 4 or more vs 0 IMB visits.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Dental treatments and Medicaid payments for children up to age 6 years enabled assessment of the likelihood of whether IMB was cost-saving and, if not, the additional payments per hospital episode avoided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Into the Mouths of Babes is 32% likely to be cost-saving, with discounting of benefits and payments. On average, IMB visits cost $11 more than reduced dental treatment payments per person. The program almost breaks even if future benefits from prevention are not discounted, and it would be cost-saving with certainty if IMB services could be provided at $34 instead of $55 per visit. The program is cost-effective with 95% certainty if Medicaid is willing to pay $2331 per hospital episode avoided.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Into the Mouths of Babes improves dental health for additional payments that can be weighed against unmeasured hospitalization costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8310,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine","volume":"166 10","pages":"945-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4610377/pdf/nihms415898.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a medical office-based preventive oral health program in North Carolina called Into the Mouths of Babes (IMB).

Design: Observational study using Medicaid claims data (2000-2006).

Setting: Medical staff delivered IMB services in medical offices, and dentists provided dental services in offices or hospitals.

Participants: A total of 209 285 children enrolled in Medicaid at age 6 months.

Interventions: Into the Mouths of Babes visits included screening, parental counseling, topical fluoride application, and referral to dentists, if needed. The cost-effectiveness analysis used the Medicaid program perspective and a propensity score-matched sample with regression analysis to compare children with 4 or more vs 0 IMB visits.

Main outcome measures: Dental treatments and Medicaid payments for children up to age 6 years enabled assessment of the likelihood of whether IMB was cost-saving and, if not, the additional payments per hospital episode avoided.

Results: Into the Mouths of Babes is 32% likely to be cost-saving, with discounting of benefits and payments. On average, IMB visits cost $11 more than reduced dental treatment payments per person. The program almost breaks even if future benefits from prevention are not discounted, and it would be cost-saving with certainty if IMB services could be provided at $34 instead of $55 per visit. The program is cost-effective with 95% certainty if Medicaid is willing to pay $2331 per hospital episode avoided.

Conclusions: Into the Mouths of Babes improves dental health for additional payments that can be weighed against unmeasured hospitalization costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医务室为年轻的医疗补助参保者提供预防性口腔保健的成本效益。
目的估算北卡罗来纳州一项名为 "婴儿之口"(Into the Mouths of Babes,IMB)的医疗诊所预防性口腔健康计划的成本效益:设计:使用医疗补助报销数据(2000-2006 年)进行观察研究:环境:医务人员在医务室提供 IMB 服务,牙医在医务室或医院提供牙科服务:共有 209 285 名 6 个月大的儿童加入了医疗补助计划:Into the Mouths of Babes(婴儿口腔护理)就诊包括筛查、家长咨询、局部涂氟以及必要时转诊至牙医。成本效益分析采用了医疗补助计划视角和倾向得分匹配样本,并通过回归分析对接受过 4 次或 4 次以上 IMB 访问的儿童与未接受过 0 次 IMB 访问的儿童进行了比较:主要结果测量:对 6 岁以下儿童的牙科治疗和医疗补助支付进行评估,以确定 IMB 是否节约成本,如果不节约成本,则评估每次住院所避免的额外支付:结果:"婴儿口中的婴儿 "计划节省成本的可能性为 32%,其中包括福利和付款的折扣。平均而言,IMB 的就诊费用比每人减少的牙科治疗费用高出 11 美元。如果不扣除未来预防带来的收益,该计划几乎可以实现收支平衡;如果每次就诊的 IMB 服务费用为 34 美元,而不是 55 美元,那么该计划可以肯定节约成本。如果医疗补助计划愿意为每次住院支付 2331 美元,那么该计划的成本效益就有 95% 的把握:结论:"走进婴儿的嘴巴 "计划可以改善牙齿健康,但需要额外支付费用,而这些费用可以与未计量的住院费用进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
Changing the conversation regarding pediatric cholesterol screening: the rare disease paradigm. Prioritization of comparative effectiveness research topics in hospital pediatrics. Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ): a brief instrument for the pediatric emergency department. Safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine administered routinely to females. Parental influence on substance use in adolescent social networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1