Randomized trial of long-acting sustained-release naltrexone implant vs oral naltrexone or placebo for preventing relapse to opioid dependence.

Evgeny Krupitsky, Edwin Zvartau, Elena Blokhina, Elena Verbitskaya, Valentina Wahlgren, Marina Tsoy-Podosenin, Natalia Bushara, Andrey Burakov, Dmitry Masalov, Tatyana Romanova, Arina Tyurina, Vladimir Palatkin, Tatyana Slavina, Anna Pecoraro, George E Woody
{"title":"Randomized trial of long-acting sustained-release naltrexone implant vs oral naltrexone or placebo for preventing relapse to opioid dependence.","authors":"Evgeny Krupitsky,&nbsp;Edwin Zvartau,&nbsp;Elena Blokhina,&nbsp;Elena Verbitskaya,&nbsp;Valentina Wahlgren,&nbsp;Marina Tsoy-Podosenin,&nbsp;Natalia Bushara,&nbsp;Andrey Burakov,&nbsp;Dmitry Masalov,&nbsp;Tatyana Romanova,&nbsp;Arina Tyurina,&nbsp;Vladimir Palatkin,&nbsp;Tatyana Slavina,&nbsp;Anna Pecoraro,&nbsp;George E Woody","doi":"10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.1a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CONTEXT Sustained-release naltrexone implants may improve outcomes of nonagonist treatment of opioid addiction. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of naltrexone implants, oral naltrexone hydrochloride, and nonmedication treatment. DESIGN Six-month double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial. SETTING Addiction treatment programs in St Petersburg, Russia. PARTICIPANTS Three hundred six opioid-addicted patients recently undergoing detoxification. INTERVENTIONS Biweekly counseling and 1 of the following 3 treatments for 24 weeks: (1) 1000-mg naltrexone implant and oral placebo (NI+OP group; 102 patients); (2) placebo implant and 50-mg oral naltrexone hydrochloride (PI+ON group; 102 patients); or (3) placebo implant and oral placebo (PI+OP group; 102 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Percentage of patients retained in treatment without relapse. RESULTS By month 6, 54 of 102 patients in the NI+OP group (52.9%) remained in treatment without relapse compared with 16 of 102 patients in the PI+ON group (15.7%) (survival analysis, log-rank test, P < .001) and 11 of 102 patients in the PI+OP group (10.8%) (P < .001). The PI+ON vs PI+OP comparison showed a nonsignificant trend favoring the PI+ON group (P = .07). Counting missing test results as positive, the proportion of urine screening tests yielding negative results for opiates was 63.6% (95% CI, 60%-66%) for the NI+OP group; 42.7% (40%-45%) for the PI+ON group; and 34.1% (32%-37%) for the PI+OP group (P < .001, Fisher exact test, compared with the NI+OP group). Twelve wound infections occurred among 244 implantations (4.9%) in the NI+OP group, 2 among 181 (1.1%) in the PI+ON group, and 1 among 148 (0.7%) in the PI+OP group (P = .02). All events were in the first 2 weeks after implantation and resolved with antibiotic therapy. Four local-site reactions (redness and swelling) occurred in the second month after implantation in the NI+OP group (P = .12), and all resolved with antiallergy medication treatment. Other nonlocal-site adverse effects were reported in 8 of 886 visits (0.9%) in the NI+OP group, 4 of 522 visits (0.8%) in the PI+ON group, and 3 of 394 visits (0.8%) in the PI+ON group; all resolved and none were serious. No evidence of increased deaths from overdose after naltrexone treatment ended was found. CONCLUSIONS The implant is more effective than oral naltrexone or placebo. More patients in the NI+OP than in the other groups develop wound infections or local irritation, but none are serious and all resolve with treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00678418.</p>","PeriodicalId":8286,"journal":{"name":"Archives of general psychiatry","volume":"69 9","pages":"973-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.1a","citationCount":"123","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of general psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.1a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 123

Abstract

CONTEXT Sustained-release naltrexone implants may improve outcomes of nonagonist treatment of opioid addiction. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of naltrexone implants, oral naltrexone hydrochloride, and nonmedication treatment. DESIGN Six-month double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial. SETTING Addiction treatment programs in St Petersburg, Russia. PARTICIPANTS Three hundred six opioid-addicted patients recently undergoing detoxification. INTERVENTIONS Biweekly counseling and 1 of the following 3 treatments for 24 weeks: (1) 1000-mg naltrexone implant and oral placebo (NI+OP group; 102 patients); (2) placebo implant and 50-mg oral naltrexone hydrochloride (PI+ON group; 102 patients); or (3) placebo implant and oral placebo (PI+OP group; 102 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Percentage of patients retained in treatment without relapse. RESULTS By month 6, 54 of 102 patients in the NI+OP group (52.9%) remained in treatment without relapse compared with 16 of 102 patients in the PI+ON group (15.7%) (survival analysis, log-rank test, P < .001) and 11 of 102 patients in the PI+OP group (10.8%) (P < .001). The PI+ON vs PI+OP comparison showed a nonsignificant trend favoring the PI+ON group (P = .07). Counting missing test results as positive, the proportion of urine screening tests yielding negative results for opiates was 63.6% (95% CI, 60%-66%) for the NI+OP group; 42.7% (40%-45%) for the PI+ON group; and 34.1% (32%-37%) for the PI+OP group (P < .001, Fisher exact test, compared with the NI+OP group). Twelve wound infections occurred among 244 implantations (4.9%) in the NI+OP group, 2 among 181 (1.1%) in the PI+ON group, and 1 among 148 (0.7%) in the PI+OP group (P = .02). All events were in the first 2 weeks after implantation and resolved with antibiotic therapy. Four local-site reactions (redness and swelling) occurred in the second month after implantation in the NI+OP group (P = .12), and all resolved with antiallergy medication treatment. Other nonlocal-site adverse effects were reported in 8 of 886 visits (0.9%) in the NI+OP group, 4 of 522 visits (0.8%) in the PI+ON group, and 3 of 394 visits (0.8%) in the PI+ON group; all resolved and none were serious. No evidence of increased deaths from overdose after naltrexone treatment ended was found. CONCLUSIONS The implant is more effective than oral naltrexone or placebo. More patients in the NI+OP than in the other groups develop wound infections or local irritation, but none are serious and all resolve with treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00678418.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长效缓释纳曲酮植入物与口服纳曲酮或安慰剂预防阿片类药物依赖复发的随机试验。
背景:缓释纳曲酮植入物可能改善阿片类药物成瘾非激动剂治疗的结果。目的比较纳曲酮种植体、口服盐酸纳曲酮和非药物治疗的疗效。设计:为期6个月的双盲、双哑、随机试验。俄罗斯圣彼得堡的毒瘾治疗项目。参与者3600名阿片类药物成瘾患者最近正在接受戒毒治疗。干预措施:每两周进行一次咨询,并在以下3种治疗方案中选择1种,疗程为24周:(1)纳曲酮植入物1000mg并口服安慰剂(NI+OP组);102名患者);(2)安慰剂植入和口服盐酸纳曲酮50 mg (PI+ON组);102名患者);(3)植入安慰剂和口服安慰剂(PI+OP组);102名患者)。主要结局指标:接受治疗且无复发的患者百分比。结果到第6个月,NI+OP组102例患者中有54例(52.9%)未复发,而PI+ON组102例患者中有16例(15.7%)未复发(生存分析,log-rank检验,P < 0.001), PI+OP组102例患者中有11例(10.8%)未复发(P < 0.001)。PI+ON组与PI+OP组比较,PI+ON组无明显优势(P = .07)。将遗漏的检测结果计算为阳性,NI+OP组阿片类药物尿液筛查结果阴性的比例为63.6% (95% CI, 60%-66%);PI+ON组为42.7% (40% ~ 45%);PI+OP组为34.1% (32% ~ 37%)(P < 0.001, Fisher精确检验,与NI+OP组比较)。NI+OP组244例患者中有12例(4.9%)出现创面感染,PI+ON组181例患者中有2例(1.1%)出现创面感染,PI+OP组148例患者中有1例(0.7%)出现创面感染(P = 0.02)。所有事件均发生在植入后的前2周,并经抗生素治疗消退。NI+OP组植入术后第2个月出现4例局部反应(红肿)(P = 0.12),经抗过敏药物治疗后均缓解。NI+OP组886次就诊中有8次(0.9%),PI+ON组522次就诊中有4次(0.8%),PI+ON组394次就诊中有3次(0.8%)报告了其他非局部部位不良反应;所有问题都解决了,没有一个是严肃的。没有证据表明纳曲酮治疗结束后过量死亡增加。结论种植体比口服纳曲酮或安慰剂更有效。NI+OP组患者出现伤口感染或局部刺激的比例高于其他组,但均不严重,且均通过治疗得到缓解。试验注册clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00678418。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of general psychiatry
Archives of general psychiatry 医学-精神病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Excavation Improvement of brain reward abnormalities by antipsychotic monotherapy in schizophrenia. National trends in the office-based treatment of children, adolescents, and adults with antipsychotics. A system-level transcriptomic analysis of schizophrenia using postmortem brain tissue samples. Birth cohort effects on adolescent alcohol use: the influence of social norms from 1976 to 2007.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1