Central and peripheral venous lines-associated blood stream infections in the critically ill surgical patients.

Mohamed Ali Ugas, Hyongyu Cho, Gregory M Trilling, Zainab Tahir, Humaera Farrukh Raja, Sami Ramadan, Waseem Jerjes, Peter V Giannoudis
{"title":"Central and peripheral venous lines-associated blood stream infections in the critically ill surgical patients.","authors":"Mohamed Ali Ugas,&nbsp;Hyongyu Cho,&nbsp;Gregory M Trilling,&nbsp;Zainab Tahir,&nbsp;Humaera Farrukh Raja,&nbsp;Sami Ramadan,&nbsp;Waseem Jerjes,&nbsp;Peter V Giannoudis","doi":"10.1186/1750-1164-6-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> Critically ill surgical patients are always at increased risk of actual or potentially life-threatening health complications. Central/peripheral venous lines form a key part of their care. We review the current evidence on incidence of central and peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in critically ill surgical patients, and outline pathways for prevention and intervention. An extensive systematic electronic search was carried out on the relevant databases. Articles were considered suitable for inclusion if they investigated catheter colonisation and catheter-related bloodstream infection. Two independent reviewers engaged in selecting the appropriate articles in line with our protocol retrieved 8 articles published from 1999 to 2011. Outcomes on CVC colonisation and infections were investigated in six studies; four of which were prospective cohort studies, one prospective longitudinal study and one retrospective cohort study. Outcomes relating only to PICCs were reported in one prospective randomised trial. We identified only one study that compared CVC- and PICC-related complications in surgical intensive care units. Although our search protocol may not have yielded an exhaustive list we have identified a key deficiency in the literature, namely a paucity of studies investigating the incidence of CVC- and PICC-related bloodstream infection in exclusively critically ill surgical populations. In summary, the diverse definitions for the diagnosis of central and peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections along with the vastly different sample size and extremely small PICC population size has, predictably, yielded inconsistent findings. Our current understanding is still limited; the studies we have identified do point us towards some tentative understanding that the CVC/PICC performance remains inconclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":87428,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","volume":"6 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1750-1164-6-8","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgical innovation and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-6-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Critically ill surgical patients are always at increased risk of actual or potentially life-threatening health complications. Central/peripheral venous lines form a key part of their care. We review the current evidence on incidence of central and peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in critically ill surgical patients, and outline pathways for prevention and intervention. An extensive systematic electronic search was carried out on the relevant databases. Articles were considered suitable for inclusion if they investigated catheter colonisation and catheter-related bloodstream infection. Two independent reviewers engaged in selecting the appropriate articles in line with our protocol retrieved 8 articles published from 1999 to 2011. Outcomes on CVC colonisation and infections were investigated in six studies; four of which were prospective cohort studies, one prospective longitudinal study and one retrospective cohort study. Outcomes relating only to PICCs were reported in one prospective randomised trial. We identified only one study that compared CVC- and PICC-related complications in surgical intensive care units. Although our search protocol may not have yielded an exhaustive list we have identified a key deficiency in the literature, namely a paucity of studies investigating the incidence of CVC- and PICC-related bloodstream infection in exclusively critically ill surgical populations. In summary, the diverse definitions for the diagnosis of central and peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections along with the vastly different sample size and extremely small PICC population size has, predictably, yielded inconsistent findings. Our current understanding is still limited; the studies we have identified do point us towards some tentative understanding that the CVC/PICC performance remains inconclusive.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科危重病人中央和外周静脉相关血流感染。
危重外科手术患者发生实际或潜在危及生命的健康并发症的风险总是增加的。中心/外周静脉线路是他们护理的关键部分。我们回顾了目前危重外科患者中心静脉和外周静脉导管相关血流感染发生率的证据,并概述了预防和干预的途径。对相关数据库进行了广泛、系统的电子检索。如果研究了导管定植和导管相关血流感染,则认为文章适合纳入。两位独立评审员根据我们的方案选择了合适的文章,检索了1999年至2011年发表的8篇文章。在六项研究中调查了CVC定植和感染的结果;其中4项为前瞻性队列研究、1项前瞻性纵向研究和1项回顾性队列研究。一项前瞻性随机试验报告了仅与PICCs相关的结果。我们只发现了一项比较外科重症监护室CVC和PICC相关并发症的研究。尽管我们的搜索方案可能没有得出一个详尽的列表,但我们已经确定了文献中的一个关键缺陷,即缺乏研究专门针对危重外科人群的CVC和PICC相关血流感染的发生率。总之,可以预见,诊断中心静脉和外周静脉导管相关血流感染的不同定义,以及截然不同的样本量和极小的PICC人群规模,产生了不一致的结果。我们目前的理解仍然有限;我们已经确定的研究确实为我们提供了一些初步的理解,即CVC/PICC的性能仍然没有定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel treatments for complications after bariatric surgery Assessment of central venous catheterization in a simulated model using a motion-tracking device: an experimental validation study Current Outcomes of Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch Benefits of intraoperative endoscopy: case report and review of 300 sleeves gastrectomies Development of automated postoperative enteral nutrition: restricting feeding site inflow to match peristaltic outflow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1