Readability and Missing Data Rates in CAHPS 2.0 Medicare Survey in African American and White Medicare Respondents

Marie Ngetiko Fongwa RN, MPH, PhD , Claude M. Setodji PhD , Sylvia H. Paz PhD , Leo S. Morales MD, PhD , W.N. Steers PhD , Ron D. Hays PhD
{"title":"Readability and Missing Data Rates in CAHPS 2.0 Medicare Survey in African American and White Medicare Respondents","authors":"Marie Ngetiko Fongwa RN, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;Claude M. Setodji PhD ,&nbsp;Sylvia H. Paz PhD ,&nbsp;Leo S. Morales MD, PhD ,&nbsp;W.N. Steers PhD ,&nbsp;Ron D. Hays PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To examine associations between readability of survey items and missing data rates in a sample of white and African-American Medicare enrollees in managed care plans.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems (CAHPS) 2.0 health plan survey data collected from 139,284 respondents (127,524 whites and 11,760 African Americans) in 321 health plans. Product-moment correlations were computed between Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability estimates and the CAHPS item-missing data rates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>F-K reading levels for items ranged from 4.8 to 17.7 with a mean of 8.9 across items. Missing data rates ranged from 1% to 10%, with African Americans having significantly higher missing data rates. Correlations between missing data rates and item-level readability were statistically significant for whites (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.33, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0515) and African Americans (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.37, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.0284).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The significant associations between missing data rates and item-level readability estimates indicate that the completion of survey items varies by their readability. Enhancing the readability of survey items can improve the inclusion of survey data collected from different respondents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88882,"journal":{"name":"Health outcomes research in medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages e39-e49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehrm.2010.03.001","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health outcomes research in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877131910000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose

To examine associations between readability of survey items and missing data rates in a sample of white and African-American Medicare enrollees in managed care plans.

Methods

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems (CAHPS) 2.0 health plan survey data collected from 139,284 respondents (127,524 whites and 11,760 African Americans) in 321 health plans. Product-moment correlations were computed between Flesch-Kincaid (F-K) readability estimates and the CAHPS item-missing data rates.

Results

F-K reading levels for items ranged from 4.8 to 17.7 with a mean of 8.9 across items. Missing data rates ranged from 1% to 10%, with African Americans having significantly higher missing data rates. Correlations between missing data rates and item-level readability were statistically significant for whites (r = 0.33, P = .0515) and African Americans (r = 0.37, P = .0284).

Conclusions

The significant associations between missing data rates and item-level readability estimates indicate that the completion of survey items varies by their readability. Enhancing the readability of survey items can improve the inclusion of survey data collected from different respondents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CAHPS 2.0在非裔美国人和白人医疗保险调查对象中的可读性和数据缺失率
目的研究管理式医疗计划中白人和非裔美国医疗保险参保人样本中调查项目的可读性与数据缺失率之间的关系。方法采用消费者医疗服务提供者和系统评估(CAHPS) 2.0健康计划调查数据,收集321个健康计划的139284名受访者(127524名白人和11760名非裔美国人)。计算Flesch-Kincaid (F-K)可读性估计与CAHPS项目缺失数据率之间的积矩相关性。结果f - k阅读水平在4.8 - 17.7之间,平均8.9。数据丢失率从1%到10%不等,非裔美国人的数据丢失率要高得多。在白人(r = 0.33, P = .0515)和非裔美国人(r = 0.37, P = .0284)中,缺失数据率与项目水平可读性之间的相关性具有统计学意义。结论数据缺失率与项目可读性之间的显著关联表明,调查项目的完成程度因其可读性而异。提高调查项目的可读性可以提高从不同受访者收集的调查数据的包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Utility and Work Productivity Data for Economic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Therapies in the Netherlands and Sweden Health Care Utilization and Costs among Medicaid-enrolled Patients with Schizophrenia Experiencing Multiple Psychiatric Relapses Outcomes-based Risk-sharing Schemes: Is There a Potential Role in the Asia-Pacific Markets? Comparative Effectiveness of On-Pump versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Elderly Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Long-term Adherence to Hormone Therapy in Medicaid-enrolled Women with Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1