Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Peter J F M Lohuis, Sara Faraj-Hakim, Arno Knobbe, Wouter Duivesteijn, Gregor M Bran
{"title":"Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.","authors":"Peter J F M Lohuis,&nbsp;Sara Faraj-Hakim,&nbsp;Arno Knobbe,&nbsp;Wouter Duivesteijn,&nbsp;Gregor M Bran","doi":"10.1001/archfacial.2012.606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the split hump technique (SHT) and to examine its effectiveness for correction of an overprojected nasal dorsum in patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 97 patients. Objective assessment was performed using a short, practical questionnaire. Investigation focused on nasal patency and the patient perception of body image in relation to nasal appearance using 5-point Likert scale questions and visual analog scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of the SHT resulted in a significant improvement in nasal patency and aesthetic nasal perception. Sum functional question scores decreased from 9.154 to 6.351 and aesthetic question scores from 13.897 to 6.825 (P < .001 for both). Mean aesthetic visual analog scale scores improved in all patients, from 3.346 to 7.782 (P < .001). Graphic illustration of this improvement revealed a gaussian curve of normal distribution around a mean (SD) improvement of 4.48 (1.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Traditional en bloc humpectomy maneuvers are frequently combined with spreader graft use to avoid postoperative inferomedial repositioning of the upper lateral cartilages and inverted-V deformity. The SHT for correction of the overprojected dorsum creates a paradigm change in this patient group. The transverse segments of the upper lateral cartilages are saved and repositioned instead of being resected as a part of an en bloc osseocartilaginous composite hump resection in a transverse plane. Several modifications of the SHT enable the surgeon to deproject the nose while keeping sufficient strength in the keystone area and augmenting dorsal width. Using statistical analysis of subjective patient data, we could prove a broad acceptance and appreciation for the SHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":55470,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":"14 5","pages":"346-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archfacial.2012.606","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2012.606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the split hump technique (SHT) and to examine its effectiveness for correction of an overprojected nasal dorsum in patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.

Methods: This prospective study included 97 patients. Objective assessment was performed using a short, practical questionnaire. Investigation focused on nasal patency and the patient perception of body image in relation to nasal appearance using 5-point Likert scale questions and visual analog scales.

Results: Use of the SHT resulted in a significant improvement in nasal patency and aesthetic nasal perception. Sum functional question scores decreased from 9.154 to 6.351 and aesthetic question scores from 13.897 to 6.825 (P < .001 for both). Mean aesthetic visual analog scale scores improved in all patients, from 3.346 to 7.782 (P < .001). Graphic illustration of this improvement revealed a gaussian curve of normal distribution around a mean (SD) improvement of 4.48 (1.93).

Conclusions: Traditional en bloc humpectomy maneuvers are frequently combined with spreader graft use to avoid postoperative inferomedial repositioning of the upper lateral cartilages and inverted-V deformity. The SHT for correction of the overprojected dorsum creates a paradigm change in this patient group. The transverse segments of the upper lateral cartilages are saved and repositioned instead of being resected as a part of an en bloc osseocartilaginous composite hump resection in a transverse plane. Several modifications of the SHT enable the surgeon to deproject the nose while keeping sufficient strength in the keystone area and augmenting dorsal width. Using statistical analysis of subjective patient data, we could prove a broad acceptance and appreciation for the SHT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分离驼峰技术减鼻背过凸:97例鼻美容术患者主观身体形象与鼻外形及鼻通畅的统计分析。
目的:描述分裂驼峰技术(SHT),并检查其对矫治鼻整形患者鼻背过凸的有效性。方法:本前瞻性研究纳入97例患者。客观评估采用一份简短、实用的问卷进行。调查的重点是鼻腔通畅和患者的身体形象感知与鼻腔外观使用5点李克特量表问题和视觉模拟量表。结果:使用SHT可显著改善鼻通畅和美观鼻感觉。功能题总分从9.154降至6.351,美学题总分从13.897降至6.825 (P < 0.001)。所有患者的平均审美视觉模拟量表评分均有改善,从3.346分提高到7.782分(P < 0.001)。这种改善的图形说明显示了正态分布的高斯曲线,其平均值(SD)改善为4.48(1.93)。结论:传统的整块肱骨切除术常与扩张体移植联合使用,以避免术后上外侧软骨内侧间移位和v型内翻畸形。矫正过凸背的SHT在该患者组中创造了一个范例的改变。保留并重新定位上外侧软骨的横段,而不是在横切面上作为整体骨-软骨复合驼峰切除术的一部分切除。对SHT的一些修改使外科医生能够在保持关键区域足够的力量和增加背宽的同时使鼻子后退。通过对患者主观数据的统计分析,我们可以证明SHT得到了广泛的接受和赞赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊最新文献
A New Model for Facial Nerve Research Outcomes following temporalis tendon transfer in irradiated patients. Ethical considerations in aesthetic rhinoplasty: a survey, critical analysis, and review. Nasal arterial vasculature: medical and surgical applications. Diced cartilage augmentation: early experience with the Tasman technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1