Umbilical hernia repair in patients with signs of portal hypertension: surgical outcome and predictors of mortality.

Sung W Cho, Neil Bhayani, Pippa Newell, Maria A Cassera, Chet W Hammill, Ronald F Wolf, Paul D Hansen
{"title":"Umbilical hernia repair in patients with signs of portal hypertension: surgical outcome and predictors of mortality.","authors":"Sung W Cho,&nbsp;Neil Bhayani,&nbsp;Pippa Newell,&nbsp;Maria A Cassera,&nbsp;Chet W Hammill,&nbsp;Ronald F Wolf,&nbsp;Paul D Hansen","doi":"10.1001/archsurg.2012.1663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the outcomes of umbilical hernia repair in patients with and without signs of portal hypertension, such as esophageal varices or ascites; to assess the effect of emergency surgery on complication rates; and to identify predictors of postoperative mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Database search from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>North American hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program initiative.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We studied patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair. Those with congestive heart failure, disseminated malignant tumor, or chronic renal failure while undergoing dialysis were excluded.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Preoperative variables and perioperative course were analyzed. Main outcome measures were morbidity and mortality after umbilical hernia repair.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 390 patients with ascites and/or esophageal varices formed the study group, and the remaining 22 952 patients formed the control group. The overall morbidity and mortality rates for the study group were 13.1% and 5.1%, whereas these rates were 3.9% and 0.1% for the control group, respectively (P < .001). For the study group, the mortality after elective repair among patients with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score greater than 15 was 11.1% compared with 1.3% in patients with a MELD score of 15 or less. The patients with ascites and/or esophageal varices underwent emergency surgery more frequently than the control group (37.7% vs 4.9%; P < .001). Emergency surgery for the study group was associated with a higher morbidity than elective surgery (20.8% vs 8.3%; P < .001) but not a significantly higher mortality (7.4% vs 3.7%; P = .11). However, logistic regression analysis showed that age older than 65 years, MELD score higher than 15, albumin level less than 3.0 g/dL (to convert to grams per liter, multiply by 10), and sepsis at presentation were more predictive of postoperative mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Umbilical hernia repair in the presence of ascites and/or esophageal varices is associated with significant postoperative complication rates. Emergency surgery is associated with higher morbidity rates but not significantly higher mortality rates. Elective repair of umbilical hernia should be avoided for those with adverse predictors, such as age older than 65 years, MELD score higher than 15, and albumin level less than 3.0 g/dL.</p>","PeriodicalId":8298,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Surgery","volume":"147 9","pages":"864-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1663","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.1663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of umbilical hernia repair in patients with and without signs of portal hypertension, such as esophageal varices or ascites; to assess the effect of emergency surgery on complication rates; and to identify predictors of postoperative mortality.

Design: Database search from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009.

Setting: North American hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program initiative.

Patients: We studied patients who underwent umbilical hernia repair. Those with congestive heart failure, disseminated malignant tumor, or chronic renal failure while undergoing dialysis were excluded.

Main outcome measures: Preoperative variables and perioperative course were analyzed. Main outcome measures were morbidity and mortality after umbilical hernia repair.

Results: A total of 390 patients with ascites and/or esophageal varices formed the study group, and the remaining 22 952 patients formed the control group. The overall morbidity and mortality rates for the study group were 13.1% and 5.1%, whereas these rates were 3.9% and 0.1% for the control group, respectively (P < .001). For the study group, the mortality after elective repair among patients with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score greater than 15 was 11.1% compared with 1.3% in patients with a MELD score of 15 or less. The patients with ascites and/or esophageal varices underwent emergency surgery more frequently than the control group (37.7% vs 4.9%; P < .001). Emergency surgery for the study group was associated with a higher morbidity than elective surgery (20.8% vs 8.3%; P < .001) but not a significantly higher mortality (7.4% vs 3.7%; P = .11). However, logistic regression analysis showed that age older than 65 years, MELD score higher than 15, albumin level less than 3.0 g/dL (to convert to grams per liter, multiply by 10), and sepsis at presentation were more predictive of postoperative mortality.

Conclusions: Umbilical hernia repair in the presence of ascites and/or esophageal varices is associated with significant postoperative complication rates. Emergency surgery is associated with higher morbidity rates but not significantly higher mortality rates. Elective repair of umbilical hernia should be avoided for those with adverse predictors, such as age older than 65 years, MELD score higher than 15, and albumin level less than 3.0 g/dL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有门静脉高压症征象的脐疝修补术:手术结果和死亡率的预测因素。
目的:比较有和无门静脉曲张或腹水等门静脉高压症患者脐疝修复的结果;评估急诊手术对并发症发生率的影响;并确定术后死亡率的预测因素。设计:从2005年1月1日到2009年12月31日的数据库搜索。环境:参与美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划倡议的北美医院。患者:我们研究了接受脐疝修补术的患者。排除有充血性心力衰竭、播散性恶性肿瘤或慢性肾衰竭的患者。主要观察指标:分析术前变量及围手术期过程。主要观察指标为脐疝修补术后的发病率和死亡率。结果:共有390例腹水和/或食管静脉曲张患者组成研究组,其余22 952例患者组成对照组。研究组的总发病率和死亡率分别为13.1%和5.1%,而对照组的总发病率和死亡率分别为3.9%和0.1% (P < 0.001)。在研究组中,终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分大于15的患者择期修复后的死亡率为11.1%,而MELD评分小于等于15的患者择期修复后的死亡率为1.3%。腹水和/或食管静脉曲张患者接受急诊手术的频率高于对照组(37.7% vs 4.9%;P < 0.001)。研究组急诊手术的发病率高于择期手术(20.8% vs 8.3%;P < 0.001),但死亡率没有显著升高(7.4% vs 3.7%;P = .11)。然而,logistic回归分析显示,年龄大于65岁,MELD评分高于15,白蛋白水平低于3.0 g/dL(换算成克/升,乘以10),就诊时败血症更能预测术后死亡率。结论:存在腹水和/或食管静脉曲张的脐疝修补术与显著的术后并发症发生率相关。急诊手术与较高的发病率相关,但与较高的死亡率无关。对于有不良预测因素的患者,如年龄大于65岁、MELD评分高于15分、白蛋白水平低于3.0 g/dL的患者,应避免选择脐疝修补术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Surgery
Archives of Surgery 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Synchronous Breast and Thyroid Cancer: Correlation Between two Pathologies and Management Challenges Vascularized Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve in Entrapment Syndrome at the Elbow Pseudohermaphroditism. Brothers. Preoperative biopsy evaluation of chemotherapy-associated liver injuries: looking for a needle in a haystack? Comment on "prospective evaluation of accuracy of liver biopsy findings in the identification of chemotherapy-associated liver injury".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1