Antitussive effects of the peripherally restricted GABAB receptor agonist lesogaberan in guinea pigs: comparison to baclofen and other GABAB receptor-selective agonists.

Brendan J Canning, Nanako Mori, Anders Lehmann
{"title":"Antitussive effects of the peripherally restricted GABAB receptor agonist lesogaberan in guinea pigs: comparison to baclofen and other GABAB receptor-selective agonists.","authors":"Brendan J Canning,&nbsp;Nanako Mori,&nbsp;Anders Lehmann","doi":"10.1186/1745-9974-8-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common cause of chronic cough. Both acid and nonacid reflux is thought to play a role in the initiation of coughing and cough hypersensitivity. The GABAB receptor agonist lesogaberan was developed as a peripherally restricted anti-reflux therapy that reduces the frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESR; the major cause of reflux) in animals and in patients with GERD. GABAB receptor agonists have also been shown to possess antitussive effects in patients and in animals independent of their effects on TLESR, suggesting that lesogaberan may be a promising treatment for chronic cough.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have assessed the direct antitussive effects of lesogaberan (AZD3355). The effects of other GABAB receptor agonists were also determined. Coughing was evoked in awake guinea pigs using aerosol challenges with citric acid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesogaberan dose-dependently inhibited citric acid evoked coughing in guinea pigs. Comparable effects of the GABAB receptor agonists baclofen and 3-aminopropylphosphinic acid (3-APPiA) on cough were also observed. Baclofen produced obvious signs of sedation and respiratory depression. By contrast, both lesogaberan and 3-APPiA (both inactivated centrally by GABA transporters) were devoid of sedative effects and did not alter respiratory rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Together, the data suggest that lesogaberan and related GABAB receptor agonists may hold promise as safe and effective antitussive agents largely devoid of CNS side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10747,"journal":{"name":"Cough (London, England)","volume":"8 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-8-7","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cough (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-8-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Unlabelled:

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common cause of chronic cough. Both acid and nonacid reflux is thought to play a role in the initiation of coughing and cough hypersensitivity. The GABAB receptor agonist lesogaberan was developed as a peripherally restricted anti-reflux therapy that reduces the frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESR; the major cause of reflux) in animals and in patients with GERD. GABAB receptor agonists have also been shown to possess antitussive effects in patients and in animals independent of their effects on TLESR, suggesting that lesogaberan may be a promising treatment for chronic cough.

Methods: We have assessed the direct antitussive effects of lesogaberan (AZD3355). The effects of other GABAB receptor agonists were also determined. Coughing was evoked in awake guinea pigs using aerosol challenges with citric acid.

Results: Lesogaberan dose-dependently inhibited citric acid evoked coughing in guinea pigs. Comparable effects of the GABAB receptor agonists baclofen and 3-aminopropylphosphinic acid (3-APPiA) on cough were also observed. Baclofen produced obvious signs of sedation and respiratory depression. By contrast, both lesogaberan and 3-APPiA (both inactivated centrally by GABA transporters) were devoid of sedative effects and did not alter respiratory rate.

Conclusions: Together, the data suggest that lesogaberan and related GABAB receptor agonists may hold promise as safe and effective antitussive agents largely devoid of CNS side effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周限制性GABAB受体激动剂lesogaberan对豚鼠的止咳作用:与巴氯芬和其他GABAB受体选择性激动剂的比较
背景:胃食管反流病(GERD)是慢性咳嗽的常见原因。酸反流和非酸反流都被认为在咳嗽和咳嗽过敏中起作用。GABAB受体激动剂lesogaberan是一种外周限制性抗反流疗法,可减少短暂性食管下括约肌松弛(TLESR;(反流的主要原因)在动物和反流患者中。GABAB受体激动剂也被证明对患者和动物具有独立于其对TLESR的作用的止咳作用,这表明lesogaberan可能是一种有希望的慢性咳嗽治疗方法。方法:对莱索加伯兰(AZD3355)的直接镇咳作用进行评价。其他GABAB受体激动剂的作用也被确定。用含柠檬酸的气雾剂刺激醒着的豚鼠咳嗽。结果:莱索加伯兰剂量依赖性地抑制柠檬酸引起的豚鼠咳嗽。GABAB受体激动剂巴氯芬和3-氨基丙基膦酸(3-APPiA)治疗咳嗽的效果也相当。巴氯芬产生明显的镇静和呼吸抑制迹象。相比之下,lesogaberan和3-APPiA(均被GABA转运体中枢失活)没有镇静作用,也没有改变呼吸速率。结论:综上所述,数据表明莱索加伯兰和相关的GABAB受体激动剂可能有望成为安全有效的止咳剂,在很大程度上没有中枢神经系统副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A crossover randomized comparative study of zofenopril and ramipril on cough reflex and airway inflammation in healthy volunteers. Standardized method for solubility and storage of capsaicin-based solutions for cough induction. On the definition of chronic cough and current treatment pathways: an international qualitative study. Effect of acid suppression therapy on gastroesophageal reflux and cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an intervention study. Severity of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is associated with MUC5 B genotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1