Quantitative PCR of ear discharge from Indigenous Australian children with acute otitis media with perforation supports a role for Alloiococcus otitidis as a secondary pathogen.

Robyn L Marsh, Michael J Binks, Jemima Beissbarth, Peter Christensen, Peter S Morris, Amanda J Leach, Heidi C Smith-Vaughan
{"title":"Quantitative PCR of ear discharge from Indigenous Australian children with acute otitis media with perforation supports a role for Alloiococcus otitidis as a secondary pathogen.","authors":"Robyn L Marsh,&nbsp;Michael J Binks,&nbsp;Jemima Beissbarth,&nbsp;Peter Christensen,&nbsp;Peter S Morris,&nbsp;Amanda J Leach,&nbsp;Heidi C Smith-Vaughan","doi":"10.1186/1472-6815-12-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Otitis media is endemic in remote Indigenous communities of Australia's Northern Territory. Alloiococcus otitidis is an outer ear commensal and putative middle ear pathogen that has not previously been described in acute otitis media (AOM) in this population. The aims of this study were to determine the presence, antibiotic susceptibility and bacterial load of A. otitidis in nasopharyngeal and ear discharge swabs collected from Indigenous Australian children with AOM with perforation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired nasopharyngeal and ear discharge swabs from 27 children with AOM with perforation were tested by A. otitidis quantitative PCR (qPCR). Positive swabs were cultured for 21 days. Total and respiratory pathogen bacterial loads in A. otitidis-positive swabs were determined by qPCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A. otitidis was detected by qPCR in 11 ear discharge swabs from 10 of 27 (37%) children, but was not detected in paired nasopharyngeal swabs. A. otitidis was cultured from 5 of 11 qPCR-positive swabs from four children. All A. otitidis isolates had minimum inhibitory concentrations consistent with macrolide resistance. All A. otitidis qPCR-positive swabs were culture-positive for other bacteria. A. otitidis bacterial load ranged from 2.2 × 104-1.1 × 108 cells/swab (median 1.8 × 105 cells/swab). The relative abundance of A. otitidis ranged from 0.01% to 34% of the total bacterial load (median 0.7%). In 6 of 11 qPCR-positive swabs the A. otitidis relative abundance was <1% and in 5 of 11 it was between 2% and 34%. The A. otitidis bacterial load and relative abundance measures were comparable to that of Haemophilus influenzae.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A. otitidis can be a dominant species in the bacterial communities present in the ear discharge of Indigenous children with AOM with perforation. The absence of A. otitidis in nasopharyngeal swabs suggests the ear canal as the likely primary reservoir. The significance of A. otitidis at low relative abundance is unclear; however, at higher relative abundance it may be contributing to the associated inflammation. Further studies to better understand A. otitidis as a secondary otopathogen are warranted, particularly in populations at high-risk of progression to chronic suppurative otitis media and where macrolide therapies are being used.</p>","PeriodicalId":39843,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1472-6815-12-11","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6815-12-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

Unlabelled:

Background: Otitis media is endemic in remote Indigenous communities of Australia's Northern Territory. Alloiococcus otitidis is an outer ear commensal and putative middle ear pathogen that has not previously been described in acute otitis media (AOM) in this population. The aims of this study were to determine the presence, antibiotic susceptibility and bacterial load of A. otitidis in nasopharyngeal and ear discharge swabs collected from Indigenous Australian children with AOM with perforation.

Methods: Paired nasopharyngeal and ear discharge swabs from 27 children with AOM with perforation were tested by A. otitidis quantitative PCR (qPCR). Positive swabs were cultured for 21 days. Total and respiratory pathogen bacterial loads in A. otitidis-positive swabs were determined by qPCR.

Results: A. otitidis was detected by qPCR in 11 ear discharge swabs from 10 of 27 (37%) children, but was not detected in paired nasopharyngeal swabs. A. otitidis was cultured from 5 of 11 qPCR-positive swabs from four children. All A. otitidis isolates had minimum inhibitory concentrations consistent with macrolide resistance. All A. otitidis qPCR-positive swabs were culture-positive for other bacteria. A. otitidis bacterial load ranged from 2.2 × 104-1.1 × 108 cells/swab (median 1.8 × 105 cells/swab). The relative abundance of A. otitidis ranged from 0.01% to 34% of the total bacterial load (median 0.7%). In 6 of 11 qPCR-positive swabs the A. otitidis relative abundance was <1% and in 5 of 11 it was between 2% and 34%. The A. otitidis bacterial load and relative abundance measures were comparable to that of Haemophilus influenzae.

Conclusions: A. otitidis can be a dominant species in the bacterial communities present in the ear discharge of Indigenous children with AOM with perforation. The absence of A. otitidis in nasopharyngeal swabs suggests the ear canal as the likely primary reservoir. The significance of A. otitidis at low relative abundance is unclear; however, at higher relative abundance it may be contributing to the associated inflammation. Further studies to better understand A. otitidis as a secondary otopathogen are warranted, particularly in populations at high-risk of progression to chronic suppurative otitis media and where macrolide therapies are being used.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定量PCR检测澳大利亚土著儿童急性中耳炎穿孔耳部分泌物支持异源球菌作为继发病原体的作用。
背景:中耳炎是澳大利亚北部地区偏远土著社区的地方病。异源性中耳炎球菌是一种外耳共生和假定的中耳病原体,以前未在该人群的急性中耳炎(AOM)中描述过。本研究的目的是确定从澳大利亚土著AOM穿孔儿童收集的鼻咽和耳部分泌物拭子中是否存在、抗生素敏感性和细菌载量。方法:对27例AOM伴穿孔患儿鼻咽及耳部分泌物拭子进行定量PCR (qPCR)检测。阳性拭子培养21天。采用qPCR法测定中耳炎假单胞菌阳性拭子的总病原菌载量和呼吸道病原菌载量。结果:27例患儿中10例(37%)的11份耳液拭子中qPCR检测到A.中耳炎,而配对鼻咽拭子中未检测到A.中耳炎。从4名儿童的11份qpcr阳性拭子中5份培养中耳炎单胞杆菌。所有中耳炎单胞杆菌分离株均具有与大环内酯耐药一致的最低抑菌浓度。所有中耳假单胞菌qpcr阳性拭子均为其他细菌培养阳性。A.中耳炎细菌负荷范围为2.2 × 104-1.1 × 108细胞/拭子(中位数为1.8 × 105细胞/拭子)。中耳针的相对丰度为0.01% ~ 34%(中位数为0.7%)。结论:在土著AOM伴穿孔儿童耳液细菌群落中,中耳炎单胞菌可能是优势种。鼻咽拭子中未发现中耳炎单胞菌,提示耳道可能是主要的感染源。中耳草相对丰度低的意义尚不清楚;然而,在较高的相对丰度下,可能会导致相关的炎症。进一步的研究,以更好地了解中耳炎作为一种继发性耳病原体是有必要的,特别是在发展为慢性化脓性中耳炎的高风险人群和正在使用大环内酯类药物的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of ear, nose and throat disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ISSN 1472-6815) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Cochlear implantation as a treatment for single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: a randomized controlled evaluation of cost-utility. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria isolated from patients with ear discharge in Jimma Town, Southwest, Ethiopia. Staphylococcus aureus from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis show minimal genetic association between polyp and non-polyp phenotypes. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma: a population-based survival analysis. Odontogenic necrotizing fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1