Feasibility and acceptability of routine human immunodeficiency virus testing in general practice: your views.

IF 1.7 Primary health care research & development Pub Date : 2013-04-01 Epub Date: 2012-10-08 DOI:10.1017/S1463423612000436
Sumeet Hindocha, Thomas Charlton, Michael Rayment, Nick Theobald
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of routine human immunodeficiency virus testing in general practice: your views.","authors":"Sumeet Hindocha,&nbsp;Thomas Charlton,&nbsp;Michael Rayment,&nbsp;Nick Theobald","doi":"10.1017/S1463423612000436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to a decreased morbidity and mortality. General practice offers an important window for earlier diagnosis. The British HIV Association produced guidelines in 2008 advocating an increase in HIV testing, with specific references to primary care. This study explores the awareness of, and opinions towards, these guidelines within general practice. An email questionnaire was sent to 191 general practitioners nationwide, in both areas of high and low HIV prevalence. A total of 80 doctors replied, giving a response rate of 42%. In all, 44% of the respondents were unaware of the guidelines and 89% felt comfortable discussing and carrying out an HIV test themselves; of the 11% that did not, all but one were from low prevalence areas (P = 0.037). Respondents felt that main barrier to HIV testing was patient acceptability. Having read the guidelines, 70% believed it would be feasible to follow them in practice. Those who disagreed felt that time implications were the most important reason not to adopt the guidelines. Almost half the respondents were not aware of the guidelines; having read them, the majority felt that implementation is feasible. This demonstrates the necessity for better dissemination of these guidelines. This study found that the main barrier to performing an HIV test was felt to be patient acceptance, a contradiction to findings from recent pilot studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"14 2","pages":"212-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1463423612000436","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423612000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to a decreased morbidity and mortality. General practice offers an important window for earlier diagnosis. The British HIV Association produced guidelines in 2008 advocating an increase in HIV testing, with specific references to primary care. This study explores the awareness of, and opinions towards, these guidelines within general practice. An email questionnaire was sent to 191 general practitioners nationwide, in both areas of high and low HIV prevalence. A total of 80 doctors replied, giving a response rate of 42%. In all, 44% of the respondents were unaware of the guidelines and 89% felt comfortable discussing and carrying out an HIV test themselves; of the 11% that did not, all but one were from low prevalence areas (P = 0.037). Respondents felt that main barrier to HIV testing was patient acceptability. Having read the guidelines, 70% believed it would be feasible to follow them in practice. Those who disagreed felt that time implications were the most important reason not to adopt the guidelines. Almost half the respondents were not aware of the guidelines; having read them, the majority felt that implementation is feasible. This demonstrates the necessity for better dissemination of these guidelines. This study found that the main barrier to performing an HIV test was felt to be patient acceptance, a contradiction to findings from recent pilot studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
常规人类免疫缺陷病毒检测在一般实践中的可行性和可接受性:你的观点。
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)的早期诊断可以降低发病率和死亡率。全科医生为早期诊断提供了一个重要窗口。英国艾滋病协会在2008年制定了指导方针,提倡增加艾滋病毒检测,并特别提到了初级保健。本研究探讨了在一般实践中对这些指导方针的认识和意见。向全国艾滋病毒高发和低发地区的191名全科医生发送了一份电子邮件问卷。共有80名医生回复,回复率为42%。总的来说,44%的应答者不知道这些指导方针,89%的人对自己讨论和进行艾滋病毒检测感到自在;在11%未接受治疗的患者中,除1例外,其余均来自低患病率地区(P = 0.037)。答复者认为艾滋病毒检测的主要障碍是患者的可接受性。在阅读了指导方针后,70%的人认为在实践中遵循这些指导方针是可行的。不同意的人认为时间问题是不采用准则的最重要原因。几乎一半的受访者不知道这些指导方针;读过之后,大多数人认为实施是可行的。这表明有必要更好地传播这些准则。这项研究发现,人们认为进行艾滋病毒检测的主要障碍是患者的接受程度,这与最近试点研究的结果相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nurses' experiences of competence development in home care. Perceptions of primary care among medical students in Lima, Peru: a cross-sectional study in two universities. Self-management interventions in primary care practices in France between 2010 and 2022: a descriptive national study. Life satisfaction and subjective well-being in urban slums of Gorakhpur, India: psychometric validation of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) and socio-demographic assessment. Person-centred, community-oriented, and diversity sensitive primary care for migrants; a EFPC position paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1