Initiating palliative care conversations: lessons from Jewish bioethics.

Michael Schultz, Gil Bar-Sela
{"title":"Initiating palliative care conversations: lessons from Jewish bioethics.","authors":"Michael Schultz,&nbsp;Gil Bar-Sela","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What are the ethical responsibilities of the medical staff (doctors, nurses, social workers, and chaplains) regarding the preservation of meaningful life for their patients who are approaching the end of life (EOL)? In particular, what is the staff's ethical responsibility to initiate a conversation with their patient regarding palliative care? By subjecting traditional Jewish teachings to an ethical analysis and then exploring the underlying universal principles, we will suggest a general ethical duty to inform patients of the different care options, especially in a manner that preserves hope. The principle that we can derive from Jewish bioethics teaches that the medical staff has a responsibility to help our patients live in a way that is consistent with how they understand their task or responsibility in life. For some patients, the best way to preserve a meaningful life in which they can fulfill their sense of purpose in the time that remains is to focus on palliation. For this reason, although palliative and supportive care are provided from the time of diagnosis, it is critical we make sure our patients realize that they have the opportunity to make a decision between either pursuing additional active treatments or choosing to focus primarily on palliative therapies to maximize quality of life. The Jewish tradition and our experience in spiritual care suggest the importance of helping patients preserve hope while, simultaneously, honestly acknowledging their situation. Staff members can play a vital role in helping patients make the most of this new period of their lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.07.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What are the ethical responsibilities of the medical staff (doctors, nurses, social workers, and chaplains) regarding the preservation of meaningful life for their patients who are approaching the end of life (EOL)? In particular, what is the staff's ethical responsibility to initiate a conversation with their patient regarding palliative care? By subjecting traditional Jewish teachings to an ethical analysis and then exploring the underlying universal principles, we will suggest a general ethical duty to inform patients of the different care options, especially in a manner that preserves hope. The principle that we can derive from Jewish bioethics teaches that the medical staff has a responsibility to help our patients live in a way that is consistent with how they understand their task or responsibility in life. For some patients, the best way to preserve a meaningful life in which they can fulfill their sense of purpose in the time that remains is to focus on palliation. For this reason, although palliative and supportive care are provided from the time of diagnosis, it is critical we make sure our patients realize that they have the opportunity to make a decision between either pursuing additional active treatments or choosing to focus primarily on palliative therapies to maximize quality of life. The Jewish tradition and our experience in spiritual care suggest the importance of helping patients preserve hope while, simultaneously, honestly acknowledging their situation. Staff members can play a vital role in helping patients make the most of this new period of their lives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
启动姑息治疗对话:来自犹太生物伦理学的教训。
医务人员(医生、护士、社会工作者和牧师)在为接近生命尽头的病人保留有意义的生命方面有什么道德责任?特别是,在与患者就姑息治疗展开对话时,工作人员的道德责任是什么?通过对传统犹太教义进行伦理分析,然后探索潜在的普遍原则,我们将提出一种普遍的伦理责任,即告知患者不同的护理选择,特别是以保持希望的方式。我们可以从犹太生物伦理学中得出的原则是,医务人员有责任帮助我们的病人以一种与他们如何理解自己的任务或责任相一致的方式生活。对于一些病人来说,保持有意义的生活,在剩下的时间里实现他们的目标感的最好方法是专注于缓和。因此,尽管姑息治疗和支持性治疗从诊断时就开始提供,但至关重要的是,我们要确保我们的患者意识到,他们有机会做出决定,是继续进行额外的积极治疗,还是选择主要集中在姑息治疗上,以最大限度地提高生活质量。犹太传统和我们在精神护理方面的经验表明,帮助病人保持希望的重要性,同时,诚实地承认他们的处境。工作人员可以发挥至关重要的作用,帮助病人充分利用他们生命中的这个新时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the quality of palliative care and supportive oncology: principles and practice. Illness perceptions matter: understanding quality of life and advanced illness behaviors in female patients with late-stage cancer. Monitoring of health-related quality of life and symptoms in prostate cancer survivors: a randomized trial. Characterization of skin reactions and pain reported by patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer at different sites. Whole brain radiotherapy for poor prognosis patients with brain metastases: predictably poor results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1