Measuring priority symptoms in advanced bladder cancer: development and initial validation of a brief symptom index.

Sally E Jensen, Jennifer L Beaumont, Paul B Jacobsen, Amy Abernethy, Karen L Syrjala, David Cella
{"title":"Measuring priority symptoms in advanced bladder cancer: development and initial validation of a brief symptom index.","authors":"Sally E Jensen,&nbsp;Jennifer L Beaumont,&nbsp;Paul B Jacobsen,&nbsp;Amy Abernethy,&nbsp;Karen L Syrjala,&nbsp;David Cella","doi":"10.1016/j.suponc.2012.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Improved measurement of clinically meaningful symptoms is needed in advanced bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of a new measure of advanced bladder cancer-specific symptoms, the NCCN-FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBISI-18), which assesses the symptoms perceived as most important by patients and oncology clinical experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 31 individuals with advanced bladder cancer rated the importance of 28 symptoms. In addition, 10 oncology clinical experts rated symptoms as treatment- or disease-related. Patient-rated symptoms were reconciled with published clinicians' symptom priorities, producing the NFBISI-18. Participants completed measures of quality of life (QOL) and performance status to examine initial validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An 18-item symptom index for advanced bladder cancer included 3 subscales: disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and general function/well-being. Lower scores indicate greater symptom burden. Preliminary reliability reveals good internal consistency for the full NFBISI-18 (alpha = 0.83). The NFBISI-18 was significantly associated with QOL criteria and performance status, in the expected direction.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limitations include the cross-sectional design and the relatively low reliability of the disease-related symptoms subscale.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NFBISI-18 demonstrates preliminary evidence as a valid brief measure of the most important symptoms of advanced bladder cancer, as rated by both patients and oncology clinical experts. The NFBISI-18 should have greater acceptability to regulatory authorities than previously developed questionnaires.</p>","PeriodicalId":75116,"journal":{"name":"The journal of supportive oncology","volume":"11 2","pages":"86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5886785/pdf/nihms954343.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of supportive oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suponc.2012.07.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: Improved measurement of clinically meaningful symptoms is needed in advanced bladder cancer.

Objective: This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of a new measure of advanced bladder cancer-specific symptoms, the NCCN-FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBISI-18), which assesses the symptoms perceived as most important by patients and oncology clinical experts.

Methods: A total of 31 individuals with advanced bladder cancer rated the importance of 28 symptoms. In addition, 10 oncology clinical experts rated symptoms as treatment- or disease-related. Patient-rated symptoms were reconciled with published clinicians' symptom priorities, producing the NFBISI-18. Participants completed measures of quality of life (QOL) and performance status to examine initial validity.

Results: An 18-item symptom index for advanced bladder cancer included 3 subscales: disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and general function/well-being. Lower scores indicate greater symptom burden. Preliminary reliability reveals good internal consistency for the full NFBISI-18 (alpha = 0.83). The NFBISI-18 was significantly associated with QOL criteria and performance status, in the expected direction.

Limitations: Limitations include the cross-sectional design and the relatively low reliability of the disease-related symptoms subscale.

Conclusion: The NFBISI-18 demonstrates preliminary evidence as a valid brief measure of the most important symptoms of advanced bladder cancer, as rated by both patients and oncology clinical experts. The NFBISI-18 should have greater acceptability to regulatory authorities than previously developed questionnaires.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量晚期膀胱癌的优先症状:一个简短症状指数的发展和初步验证。
背景:晚期膀胱癌需要改进有临床意义的症状测量方法。目的:本研究开发并检验了一种新的晚期膀胱癌特异性症状测量方法NCCN-FACT膀胱症状指数-18 (NFBISI-18)的初步可靠性和有效性,该方法评估了患者和肿瘤临床专家认为最重要的症状。方法:对31例晚期膀胱癌患者28种症状的重要性进行评分。此外,10名肿瘤临床专家将症状评为与治疗或疾病相关。患者评价的症状与发表的临床医生的症状优先级相一致,产生NFBISI-18。参与者完成了生活质量(QOL)和表现状态的测量,以检查初始有效性。结果:晚期膀胱癌的18项症状指数包括疾病相关症状、治疗副作用和一般功能/幸福感3个分量表。分数越低表明症状负担越大。初步信度显示完整的NFBISI-18具有良好的内部一致性(alpha = 0.83)。NFBISI-18与QOL标准和表现状态显著相关,且符合预期方向。局限性:局限性包括横断面设计和疾病相关症状亚量表相对较低的可靠性。结论:根据患者和肿瘤临床专家的评价,NFBISI-18初步证明了作为晚期膀胱癌最重要症状的有效简短衡量标准。NFBISI-18应该比以前开发的问卷更容易被监管机构接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the quality of palliative care and supportive oncology: principles and practice. Illness perceptions matter: understanding quality of life and advanced illness behaviors in female patients with late-stage cancer. Monitoring of health-related quality of life and symptoms in prostate cancer survivors: a randomized trial. Characterization of skin reactions and pain reported by patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer at different sites. Whole brain radiotherapy for poor prognosis patients with brain metastases: predictably poor results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1