Comparison of adverse events of erlotinib with those of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a case-control study in a Japanese population.

Osaka city medical journal Pub Date : 2012-06-01
Tomohiro Suzumura, Tatsuo Kimura, Shinzoh Kudoh, Kanako Umekawa, Misato Nagata, Hidenori Tanaka, Shigeki Mitsuoka, Naruo Yoshimura, Yukimi Kira, Kazuto Hirata
{"title":"Comparison of adverse events of erlotinib with those of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a case-control study in a Japanese population.","authors":"Tomohiro Suzumura,&nbsp;Tatsuo Kimura,&nbsp;Shinzoh Kudoh,&nbsp;Kanako Umekawa,&nbsp;Misato Nagata,&nbsp;Hidenori Tanaka,&nbsp;Shigeki Mitsuoka,&nbsp;Naruo Yoshimura,&nbsp;Yukimi Kira,&nbsp;Kazuto Hirata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rash, liver dysfunction, and diarrhea are known as adverse events of erlotinib and gefitinib. However, clinical trials with gefitinib have reported different adverse events compared to those with erlotinib. In an in vitro study, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 was shown to be involved in the metabolism of gefitinib and not of erlotinib. It has been hypothesized that gefitinib therapy results in different adverse events compared to erlotinib therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The frequency of each adverse event was evaluated in a case-control study on Japanese patients who were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. The CYP2D6 phenotype was categorized into 2 groups according to functional or reduced metabolic levels. In addition, we evaluated the odds ratio (OR) of adverse events with each factor, including CYP2D6 activities as well as treatment types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 112 patients received gefitinib therapy, 74 patients received erlotinib therapy, and 17 patients received erlotinib and gefitinib sequentially. The OR of developing rash with gefitinib versus erlotinib treatment was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.86). The OR of developing diarrhea with gefitinib versus erlotinib treatment was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.22-0.94). The OR of developing liver dysfunction with gefitinib versus erlotinib treatment was 3.30 (95% CI, 1.59-7.22). Reduced function of CYP2D6 was not associated with an increased risk of any adverse events in both gefitinib and erlotinib cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Erlotinib had higher rate of rash and diarrhea than gefitinib. Liver dysfunction occurred significantly more often in the gefitinib group than in the erlotinib group.</p>","PeriodicalId":19613,"journal":{"name":"Osaka city medical journal","volume":"58 1","pages":"25-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osaka city medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rash, liver dysfunction, and diarrhea are known as adverse events of erlotinib and gefitinib. However, clinical trials with gefitinib have reported different adverse events compared to those with erlotinib. In an in vitro study, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 was shown to be involved in the metabolism of gefitinib and not of erlotinib. It has been hypothesized that gefitinib therapy results in different adverse events compared to erlotinib therapy.

Methods: The frequency of each adverse event was evaluated in a case-control study on Japanese patients who were treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. The CYP2D6 phenotype was categorized into 2 groups according to functional or reduced metabolic levels. In addition, we evaluated the odds ratio (OR) of adverse events with each factor, including CYP2D6 activities as well as treatment types.

Results: A total of 112 patients received gefitinib therapy, 74 patients received erlotinib therapy, and 17 patients received erlotinib and gefitinib sequentially. The OR of developing rash with gefitinib versus erlotinib treatment was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.86). The OR of developing diarrhea with gefitinib versus erlotinib treatment was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.22-0.94). The OR of developing liver dysfunction with gefitinib versus erlotinib treatment was 3.30 (95% CI, 1.59-7.22). Reduced function of CYP2D6 was not associated with an increased risk of any adverse events in both gefitinib and erlotinib cohorts.

Conclusions: Erlotinib had higher rate of rash and diarrhea than gefitinib. Liver dysfunction occurred significantly more often in the gefitinib group than in the erlotinib group.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厄洛替尼与吉非替尼在非小细胞肺癌患者中的不良事件比较:一项日本人群的病例对照研究。
背景:皮疹、肝功能障碍和腹泻被认为是厄洛替尼和吉非替尼的不良事件。然而,与厄洛替尼相比,吉非替尼的临床试验报告了不同的不良事件。在一项体外研究中,细胞色素P450 (CYP) 2D6被证明参与吉非替尼而不是厄洛替尼的代谢。据推测,吉非替尼治疗与厄洛替尼治疗相比会导致不同的不良事件。方法:在一项病例对照研究中,对接受吉非替尼或厄洛替尼治疗的日本患者进行每项不良事件的发生率评估。CYP2D6表型根据功能或降低的代谢水平分为2组。此外,我们评估了不良事件与每个因素的比值比(OR),包括CYP2D6活性和治疗类型。结果:共有112例患者接受吉非替尼治疗,74例患者接受厄洛替尼治疗,17例患者依次接受厄洛替尼和吉非替尼治疗。吉非替尼与厄洛替尼治疗发生皮疹的OR为0.38(95%可信区间[CI], 0.15-0.86)。吉非替尼与厄洛替尼治疗发生腹泻的OR为0.46 (95% CI, 0.22-0.94)。吉非替尼与厄洛替尼治疗发生肝功能障碍的OR为3.30 (95% CI, 1.59-7.22)。在吉非替尼和厄洛替尼队列中,CYP2D6功能降低与任何不良事件风险增加无关。结论:厄洛替尼的皮疹和腹泻发生率高于吉非替尼。吉非替尼组的肝功能障碍发生率明显高于厄洛替尼组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Significance of Perioperative Blood Coagulation Factor XIII in Pulmonary Resections. Comparison of the Clinical Courses of Patients with Influenza after Neuraminidase Inhibitors Treatment: A Postcard Survey of the 2013-2014 Influenza Season in Osaka. Association of the Clinical Subtype and Etiology for Delirium with the Outcome after Risperidone Monotherapy in Patients Having Cancer. Effects of Night Shift Work on Nighttime Blood Pressure among Healthy Young Female Medical Workers. Cardio-ankle Vascular Index Associated with Coronary Plaque Burden not Plaque Morphology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1