What is the role of eye movements in eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)? a review.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2013-05-01 Epub Date: 2012-10-29 DOI:10.1017/S1352465812000793
Fiona W Jeffries, Paul Davis
{"title":"What is the role of eye movements in eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)? a review.","authors":"Fiona W Jeffries,&nbsp;Paul Davis","doi":"10.1017/S1352465812000793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Controversy continues to exist regarding how EMDR works and whether its mechanisms differ from those at work in standard exposure techniques.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate first whether eye movement bilateral stimulation is an essential component of EMDR and, second, the current status of its theoretical basis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search for relevant articles was conducted in databases using standard methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical research evidence is contradictory as to how essential EMs are in PTSD treatment. More positive support is provided by analogue studies. With regards to potential theoretical support, some evidence was found suggesting bilateral stimulation first increases access to episodic memories; and second that it could act on components of working memory which makes focusing on the traumatic memories less unpleasant and thereby improves access to these memories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest support for the contention that EMs are essential to this therapy and that a theoretical rationale exists for their use. Choice of EMDR over trauma-focused CBT should therefore remain a matter of patient choice and clinician expertise; it is suggested, however, that EMs may be more effective at reducing distress, and thereby allow other components of treatment to take place.</p>","PeriodicalId":47936,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","volume":"41 3","pages":"290-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S1352465812000793","citationCount":"92","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465812000793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 92

Abstract

Background: Controversy continues to exist regarding how EMDR works and whether its mechanisms differ from those at work in standard exposure techniques.

Aims: To investigate first whether eye movement bilateral stimulation is an essential component of EMDR and, second, the current status of its theoretical basis.

Method: A systematic search for relevant articles was conducted in databases using standard methodology.

Results: Clinical research evidence is contradictory as to how essential EMs are in PTSD treatment. More positive support is provided by analogue studies. With regards to potential theoretical support, some evidence was found suggesting bilateral stimulation first increases access to episodic memories; and second that it could act on components of working memory which makes focusing on the traumatic memories less unpleasant and thereby improves access to these memories.

Conclusions: The results suggest support for the contention that EMs are essential to this therapy and that a theoretical rationale exists for their use. Choice of EMDR over trauma-focused CBT should therefore remain a matter of patient choice and clinician expertise; it is suggested, however, that EMs may be more effective at reducing distress, and thereby allow other components of treatment to take place.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼动在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)中的作用是什么?复习一下。
背景:关于EMDR如何起作用以及其机制是否与标准暴露技术中起作用的机制不同,争议仍然存在。目的:首先探讨眼动双侧刺激是否是EMDR的必要组成部分,其次探讨其理论基础的现状。方法:采用标准方法在数据库中系统检索相关文献。结果:关于急诊在PTSD治疗中的重要性,临床研究证据是矛盾的。类似研究提供了更积极的支持。关于潜在的理论支持,一些证据表明双侧刺激首先增加了对情景记忆的访问;其次,它可以作用于工作记忆的组成部分,使专注于创伤记忆不那么不愉快,从而改善对这些记忆的访问。结论:研究结果支持以下观点:EMs对该疗法至关重要,其使用存在理论依据。因此,选择EMDR还是以创伤为重点的CBT应该取决于患者的选择和临床医生的专业知识;然而,有人建议,EMs可能更有效地减少痛苦,从而允许其他治疗的组成部分发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal aimed primarily at members of the helping and teaching professions. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy features original research papers, covering both experimental and clinical work, that contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of cognitive and behaviour therapy. The journal aims to reflect and influence the continuing changes in the concepts, methodology, and techniques of behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. A particular feature of the journal is its broad ranging scope - both in terms of topics and types of study covered. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy encompasses most areas of human behaviour and experience, and represents many different research methods, from randomized controlled trials to detailed case studies.
期刊最新文献
Internet-delivered parent-led intervention for anxiety in children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Health anxiety by proxy: exploring factors that influence parents' worries about their child's health. Developing a measure of beliefs about items in hoarding disorder (BIHD). Guided self-help CBT for distressing voices (the GiVE intervention): predictors of engagement and outcome in routine clinical practice. The Proust effect and hoarding symptoms: relationships among memory vividness, object type, and urge to save.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1